Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well the 3 mores is something I learned from him FIGJAM, and something I put into practice now, so I'm ALWAYS doing one of them, every single session.

To consider... What are your increases going to be determined by?

1)What you think you can do?

or

2) What you think you 'have' to do?

or

3) What you think you 'cant' do?

What are people's answer to this one; 1,2 or 3?

Okay, I have no secrets.

Martin deadlifts today, he is on the 290kg program

Regular deadlifts - 145kg x 12 x 3 sets

Block pulls - worked up to 270kg x 3

Deficit deadlifts - worked up to 200kg x 12

Bent rows - worked up to 120kg x 8

DB rows - worked up to 60kg x 10

This was Week 1 of his program, designed to peak on November 17

Thats everything in full, thats what Martin is doing for deadlifts, ignore the weight, I have listed all the exercises, reps, sets (sort of)

Is there any more information you require........without a video lol

By the way, the majority of our PL team is doing this

for me it would be what I think I can do

1)If you think you can . You might

2)If you think you have to . You will

3)If you think you can't . You won't.

For consideration.

Eliminate 3 . Change 1 to 2.

You will probably find you are doing this to some degree without thinking about it.

Eg:If I was to set a goal of Deadlift 350kg

I've never done it. Maybe I think I can't do it now subconciously. Maybe I think I can 'eventually' lift it. I certainly don't think I have to.

Given this, if deadlifts were part of my regular training, I would definately not get there anytime real soon. Any progress attempts I will make will be restrained and comfortable and I will probably enjoy the program, while taking forever to go nowhere near 350kg.

Edited by rev210

Zoran on the 305kg program, peaking for September 8th

Deadlifts - 290kg x 1 x 3 sets

Block pulls - 220 x 3, 240 x 3, 260 x 3, 280 x 1, 300 x 1

Deficit pulls - 240 x 5, 210 x 8

Thats the whole workout

sounds a bit like the stuff rev is doing, I find that interesting because it is such low reps. Obviously for the very advanced lifters.

I did SLDL 85 x 15 3 times tonight, I've noticed two things. I'm getting better at it, and my grip is not the point of failure any more.

Going to give regular deadlift a go next time to see how it's improved.

I've also decided I want to concentrate on weight loss for now, so I'll keep on with the linear progression as far as I can.

Edited by bozodos

1)If you think you can . You might

2)If you think you have to . You will

3)If you think you can't . You won't.

This is pretty much the reason why people quit gym before seeing success, as those who have been going long enough to get reward from it, know they have to keep it up, else lose those rewards. For those who haven't seen success, it starts off as a "think I can" and can all too quickly fall into a "I can't" if there is no reinforcement (I've always maintained that if you could give someone results straight away, they would never quit...hence I stress focus on strength goals to distract from the slow onset of physical changes).

Yet even for those who have seen success, it's easy to fall into the trap of believing in your limitations, and so your accountability towards your goals takes a dive.

Same goes for coaching; there's more accountability in it when you are lifting not just for yourself, but to meet the expectations of another. This is why I've seen more improvement than ever, since documenting my lifting on here: I have to lift the weight or people see that I'm all talk hahaha

As for people who do incredible things, they are usually the ones who won't stop until they are satisfied, and for them, satisfaction is a dangling carrot that will never be caught, but must forever be chased after. You may never catch it, but you will end up miles away from mediocre.

Wherever after a warmup, middle is fine...or can stick it at the end like I do. Doesn't have to be huge, just 10kg above your current max weight, so maybe one rep of 150kg. You'll clear it easy. Then try for 155kg or 160kg the week after.

Shit will make your 140kg seem light as and once you're doing a 160kg single, you will be able to get about 7 of 140kg out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...