Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

90kg x 10

130kg x 10

167.5kg x 5

185kg x 2

90kg x 10

130kg x 10

170kg x 5

185kg x 1

180kg x 1

New 5 rep pb of 170kg - very happy with this! That's a 10kg increase in 2 weeks. Unfortunately, it taxed me for the second rep of 185kg, so left it at a single and dropped back to 180kg.

Will try to secure the 185kg x 2 after the 170kg reps next time.

  • 3 months later...

90kg x 10

130kg x 10

170kg x 5

185kg x 1

180kg x 1

Been a while since I've been able to update this with an improvement!

Amidst holidays, a new job and a new gym, I caught a bad run of tonsilitis a while ago, which caused me to drop 4kg of bodyweight (if you thought I was skinny before, lol...) and instantly lose 10-15kg off all my lifts. Annoyingly, it has taken ages to recover the strength, let alone surpass it, despite how quickly I lost it in 2 weeks of no gym and not being able to eat. It's like my body ate its muscle :/

Anyway, I am back to doing what I love and touching on old PBs. My new gym has a shortage of small weights, which necessitated the stepping up of my warm up and working set weights by 10kg, so that I could get the damn things done with just 20s, instead of waiting around for someone to finish quarter squating 55kg. The consequence is some taxing up top, but overall I'm lifting more weight and as the working sets go up, so does the ability to lift more weight on the 1RM. So exciting times ahead for me assuming I don't get sick again or die.

100kg x 10

140kg x 9

187.5kg x 1

170kg x 3

160kg x 5

Finally pulled 200kg yesterday and it was on a texas power bar, not a texas deadlift bar, no belt either. Could be more in it with those, who knows. I almost shat a lung doing it but meh, its finally good to break through the barrier!

Edited by Mitcho_7

Finally pulled 200kg yesterday and it was on a texas power bar, not a texas deadlift bar. I almost shat a lung doing it but meh its finally good to break through the barrier!

Grats Mitch!

How long did it take to lock out?

Have you been trying the 200 for long?

First time attempting it yesterday.

It was fine off the floor, but once I get to my knees its always a grind. Im weaker in deads from 4" blocks so ive just been doing heaps of block pulls and pause deads to help try and rectify that

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...