Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Along with a few other usefull bits and pieces Ive had one of these stashed away for a few years now and I'm wondering if its worth doing with the IW GT3076R . I've been through most of the threads here to see if its worth doing for an "only" 300 RWKW engine .

Recently people like Mick o have smashed 300Kw with the std manifold so I'm wondering if going to the extra grief is worth it for me . I guess none of the available front pipes are going to work with it and I'm not going to use an external gate anyway .

It seems the dramas surround clearing the engine mount and shield with the compressor housings inlet boss and hose . One thing I picked up on is that someone , Nismoid I think , reckons RB26 engine mounts aren't as tall as RB25 ones so do we think a shorter engine mount and a spacer between it and the engine bracket would help ? Is an RB20 engine mount and bracket any better ?

The $64 question is does the HKS manifold make enough of a difference with an IW turbo to make it worth the effort ? I can see the draw if you intend to go external gate but not sure otherwise .

Wolverine do you have pics of yours in the engine mount area with the GT3076R ? I know you told me more fettling had to be done but can't remember the details .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422267-hks-rb25-exhaust-manifold-worth-it/
Share on other sites

Is there any internal size difference in the HKS manifold compared to stock?

wolverine- should I bother port/polishing the stock manifold and TS 0.82 ? My tuner told me to be careful I don't take too much off because ill loose response and it could affect the torque

Edited by AngryRBGTX

HKS manifold runners flow more than a stock manifold.

DaleFZ1 has tidied up a stock manifold to remove obvious casting dags and basic port matching (if memory serves). If you are doing it yourself and are competent with a die grinder I reckon it would be worthwhile and unlikely to harm anything unless you get medieval.

Ultimately I have no doubt that a fancy manifold can be an improvement but for a streetable turbo realistically the money spent might not be that noticeable.

^+1

If you have the tools, the time, and the inclination then I'd say there is nothing to be lost by tidying the gas flow path in the OEM manifold. The runners can be made a lot nicer, and port matching is always going to help things.

I reckon the collector/merge area is not the nicest aspect of design from a flow standpoint although some judicious work with the die grinder should bring some improvement too. If you're doing the work yourself, look at the potential to pick up 10-15kW (tops) for free.

Bottom line is that if you were paying workshop rates to get it all done to optimal levels, you have blown a proportion of the cost of a decent fabricated manifold that has a decent gas flow path and collector already.

If you happened to have a cast HKS manifold sitting in the shelves however, you would be putting it to use without thinking twice.

Does anyone know the real world performance difference of the HKS vs the OE RB25 exhaust manifold ? I mean in power or torque terms not flow numbers .

Also does anyone have pics of an RB25 engine mount next to an RB26 one to show up differences ?

Cheers A .

Oh I will add whilst there are no direct comparisons that I know of. There are loads of 6boost vs std results to show that std is sh1t house. There are a few flow bench results of HKS v 6boost that show the HKS is a very good thing...so just use it or send me your bank details...as I should never had sold mine to Wolverine ;)

Mark, your sig indicates you are in Queensland. Low mount, high mount, its all legal. No good asking people based in Vic or NSW.

Regardless of whether its a HKS, 6boost, or a stocker with internal flow improvements, they are all going to make the engine exhale more easily. The flow efficiency can allow it to make more power, respond just that little bit easier, or use a little bit less fuel in general use.

Sometimes its going to be difficult to say X manifold will result in Y kW gain, and the cost:benefit analysis is hard to make. It's not that hard to conclude though, that if your setup is spec'd and tuned to run around 300rwkW and not much more, then you could find yourself spending 500-1500 for a gain of 10kW. That's not a good return on investment at the top end of the scale.

On the upside, there have been users posting up comments indicating that the gain in response and feel/driveability do not show up on dyno sheets.

The HKS low mount is very difficult to fit. The Garrett .60 or .70 housing with a 4inch induction will sit against the engine mount. Not mentioning every thing else had to be custom made to suit.

Since doing the manifold and gate rout, better off getting a local hand made high mount item.

Do I get the feeling that this manifold was made with R32 GTSTs in mind and they used a slightly different engine bracket and engine mount style ?

Also I think these were sold in a kit with a T04E turbo that had a smaller inlet boss .

BTW I don't have the wastegate just the manifold itself .

A .

It was a kunt to fit I spent 2x days on it:

making sure every thing is all flat and surfaced.

The oil port on the turbocharger get folded under the manifold that needs special fittings.

Position of the turbocharger held is only a inch above the oil drain port. That was a real kunt trying to customize a drain adaptor and pipe that doesn't kink and that short.

Turbocharger and all related bits needs to be fitted on to the manifold before bolting it up to the head. And then I found the comp housing is hitting against the engine mount.

So I ripped every thing out and bought brae high mount manifold. Life has never been easier.

The HKS stuff when on ebay. bidding from $1.

Of course once you have the manifold installed the exhaust path out of the turbo is a lot straighter so you win somewhere and you lose somewhere.

If you are changing turbos regularly then no way you would use one.

If you have a Stagea I wouldn't recommend it due to the location of the oil drain on those blocks. Otherwise like most car modifications....it requires modifying something.

Off my own topic I suppose but is much known about this manifold from Brae ? I'd always though it was impossible to make a manifold that mounted the turbo anywhere near the std position and have it work better than the std cast iron one . They say it mounts the turbo a bit further out from the engine but with minimum changes they can be made to work .

Some of that foil type quilted heat shielding would make it look a bit less lethal but its obviously not going to factory .

http://www.braeautofab.com/apps/webstore/products/show/2941402

Will reasearch these , cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...