Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GOD DAMMN IT MATT.

Stop making me jealous. Haha

That's awesome to prove the non believes on just how awesome these FP hta turbos are. I'm still saving for my 6booba and hta 3073 iss the plan at the moment. :)

I wonder what the difference would be between there 76 and 73.? Only want to really try the 73 to be different.

Josh.

I was 50/50 on the 3073 vs 3076 as response was something my car was lacking with the old setup, i do not regret the 76 choice one bit but i do really hope you go the 3073 as i have been dying to know what they will do :P

I'm still saving for my 6booba and hta 3073 iss the plan at the moment. :)

I wonder what the difference would be between there 76 and 73.? Only want to really try the 73 to be different.

Decide exactly what you want first, getting the 73 just to be different is quite an expensive exercise for not a huge amount of reward. If you really want the extra response vs power then it will be quite a beast - realistically I'd guess it will get you into the same power area as a vanilla GT3076R (350-360rwkw on the right setup), I wouldn't count on any more.... however the response will probably be pretty intense!

Decide exactly what you want first, getting the 73 just to be different is quite an expensive exercise for not a huge amount of reward. If you really want the extra response vs power then it will be quite a beast - realistically I'd guess it will get you into the same power area as a vanilla GT3076R (350-360rwkw on the right setup), I wouldn't count on any more.... however the response will probably be pretty intense!

Yeah i think the response on the 3076 version is perfect for what i am doing... Any more would just be nuts! haha

Mark at GT Pumps has some dealings with FP , may be worth while asking him if he can make you up a 73 or 76HTA GT30 turbo .

I need to ask him if he can do a HTA but with a T04E compressor housing , I reckon the bigger 0.70 AR S housing is a bit bulky for a 71 or 73mm comp size turbo . I know it's not the same thing but Garrett seem to be able to make reasonable power with GTX71 wheels in 0.60 AR T04E housings , the issue probably is that port shrouded T04E housings are thin on the ground except on GT30 BB turbos .

A .

GOD DAMMN IT MATT.

Stop making me jealous. Haha

That's awesome to prove the non believes on just how awesome these FP hta turbos are. I'm still saving for my 6booba and hta 3073 iss the plan at the moment. :)

I wonder what the difference would be between there 76 and 73.? Only want to really try the 73 to be different.

Josh.

I'm not sure whether the HTA 73 is similar to the 3076 52 trim - but FWIW I changed from a 3071 to a 3076 52 trim - both with the .78 twin scroll rear on an SR20 and found the baby 3076 to be far more responsive than the 3071. However my caveat is that I had replaced the 3 inch dump and exhaust for a 3.5 inch dump and exhaust when fitting the baby 3076.

Ill post proper graphs etc when i get time but for now these are just screen shots from Saturday when we were troubleshooting the ign problem, not bad considering the car was running on the dyno for ages and just kept pulling the numbers consistanty, these are not peak runs, just standard power runs while checking stuff, so this is as it would run on the street with full trim -

On the Dyno -

5r8Kt6F.jpg

Low Boost -

A4Jq96X.jpg

High Boost -

EXconHg.jpg

Posting for updates. :)

Where is everyone getting there HTA wheels from? States or someone in Australia?

Lol updates will come soon from mine, not sure where the others are up too.... From what i know there were a couple of others keen on the HTA but not sure who has commited too it!

I ordered mine direct from Forced Performance.

Lol updates will come soon from mine, not sure where the others are up too.... From what i know there were a couple of others keen on the HTA but not sure who has commited too it!

I ordered mine direct from Forced Performance.

How long did it take to arrive?

I dont know if there are any dealers in australia.

Mark at gtpumps deals with FP a bit though so maybe flick him an email?

As far as i know there are no Aussie dealers, i looked long and hard and ended up just going direct to FP as they were helpful and i guess i knew i was getting a genuine product and not some slap together turbo!

Back on the dyno today to finish off my tune and test for exhaust restrictions.

Made 436rwkw with the exhaust dropped at the dump pipe ( which is 3.5" from turbo) , and made 434rwkw with the full exhaust (which is only 3" from dump pipe back.

Picked up a few kw and got a flatter power curve setting u the autronic boost controll to add a bit of boost to the higher rpm, from memory it was making over 425kw from 6000rpm to 8000rpm, which should help drag times a bit will post graph later.

Edited by sky30

Back on the dyno today to finish off my tune and test for exhaust restrictions.

Made 436rwkw with the exhaust dropped at the dump pipe ( which is 3.5" from turbo) , and made 434rwkw with the full exhaust (which is only 3" from dump pipe back.

Picked up a few kw and got a flatter power curve setting u the autronic boost controll to add a bit of boost to the higher rpm, from memory it was making over 425kw from 6000rpm to 8000rpm, which should help drag times a bit will post graph later.

Looking forward to seeing the graph!!! Awesome :yes:

Back on the dyno today to finish off my tune and test for exhaust restrictions.

Made 436rwkw with the exhaust dropped at the dump pipe ( which is 3.5" from turbo) , and made 434rwkw with the full exhaust (which is only 3" from dump pipe back.

Picked up a few kw and got a flatter power curve setting u the autronic boost controll to add a bit of boost to the higher rpm, from memory it was making over 425kw from 6000rpm to 8000rpm, which should help drag times a bit will post graph later.

Wow nice power curve - how much boost, when did it make full boost, and what fuel is that on?

On the road (bit more load) it reaches 20psi at 3200rpm on the autronic logs.

I Was running 24-25 psi increasing to 26psi in the higher revs after peak torque, using bp 98 with a bit of water meth injection.

I will have to do a log to see what rpm 26psi is id guess 3300-3400.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...