Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

whats the htz stuff lith?

cheers

darren

Good question, beyond being the first overhaul of the FP compressor designs since the HTAs came out I know nothing, so who knows what sizes, specs, prices or ETA yet but I will post if I hear any more

Boostin Performance's (in the US) Eagle Talon is now running a Super 99 HTZ now and this weekend ran an 8.18 @ 176mph at it's first meet running that turbo in a bit of anger. The car then went to a "King of the Streets" event which is V8 dominated and took out it's class, running consistent low 8s. Pretty crazy stuff on a h-pattern 2litre AWD car - most other AWDs (short of R35s) running these kinds of time have methanol/nitrous and of course T4/T6 framed turbos etc.

I don't know if it's the full range, still little info on it at the moment... I am prying however, naturally ;)


You should check out the MAP EF3 if you are doing a bolt on, they are pretty mental.

I know a guy who was running a MAP EF3, from what he was saying I wasn't so impressed by the results..

I also went in a red powered Evo8MR and I was not wowed either. It was the older red, not the current HTA tech thing, but it was a red none the less.. All in was over 5,000 and it wasn't very fast.

Choose wisely :ph34r:

I know a guy who was running a MAP EF3, from what he was saying I wasn't so impressed by the results..

I also went in a red powered Evo8MR and I was not wowed either. It was the older red, not the current HTA tech thing, but it was a red none the less.. All in was over 5,000 and it wasn't very fast.

Choose wisely :ph34r:

FP Red HTA and MAP EF3 are both very very proven. If the results are not what he expected he either expected too much, chose the wrong weapon for the job, or something needs sorting with the setup - if not a combination of the three. The old red was less of a special thing (like a journal bearing TD06/T60-1 type hybrid iirc) and doughy response is no surprise. The new HTA Red is basically 34GeeTeeTee's compressor rammed together into a DBB package suited for bolting onto an EVO

*Sigh* Never considered a map cos im a ball bearing whore ;) But I also love the stock turbo response and the power I make with the response. The HTA red was pretty much the top of my list but :(

I know a guy who was running a MAP EF3, from what he was saying I wasn't so impressed by the results..

I also went in a red powered Evo8MR and I was not wowed either. It was the older red, not the current HTA tech thing, but it was a red none the less.. All in was over 5,000 and it wasn't very fast.

Choose wisely :ph34r:

Thats a little harsh, Lith :P.. I sat in the farking thing while it was punted for all it was worth LOL

However, I drove a Green of similar vintage and that was awesome.

Yeah I know Dan I've researched these badboys extensively and ive heard alot of guys on evoM say the JB reds are quite lazy in comparison to the DCBB versions but im still undecided as I luv my 270kw stock setup but I want more power (300+kw) but dont wanna sacrifice too much response. Just don't think the green will make the numbers and I believe the reds response isn't that much laggier.

Jase was the 8 you went in on E85?

He made a BIT more than 270 on the stock turbo lol he is accounting for dyno variance (if it even exists!). I can confirm Mick's evo is the ants pants in terms of having the full package.

Mick, nah it was on 98. I was mostly disappointed with the spool character rather than the power, which isn't going to change too much when on E85. If I track down anyone I know with a HTA red I will let you know.


Lith what was your bum-dyno thoughts on a HTA red strapped evo?

Yeah mate I made 312kw on a hub dyno with 25psi but as Jase said ive got a toxic fab manifold M2 cossie cams etc etc and E85 of course lol

Are you making 270kw on the stock turbo? If so, niiiiice.

Lith what was your bum-dyno thoughts on a HTA red strapped evo?

What do you mean? I haven't experienced one, if that's what you mean? I would expect it to be laggier than the stock EVO turbo, which I am sure isn't a surprise. Maybe like a bigger version of what you have on your car?

Yeah mate I made 312kw on a hub dyno with 25psi but as Jase said ive got a toxic fab manifold M2 cossie cams etc etc and E85 of course lol

What power are you after if you upgraded?

Here's a clip of the FP Super99HTZ equipped DSM doing 8.18 @ 176mph :

Devin the owner/driver/tuner says that there is still more in it, and will be winding it up for glory next weekend - hoping for 180mph trap speeds and ?.? ETs :D

Really with an Evo the turbo trade off isn't that much different to anything else IMO . I totally fail to see why people "hi flow" evo turbos with the 18 and 20G compressors - easy to do for lack lustre results .

16Gs do a pretty good job std with more boost but they're not up to big numbers because the engine package was designed to have strong mid range torque . Their leg up is the twin scrolls and shortish closeish gearing - plus that std intercooler . Only the 9 reverse rotation turbo gets the larger diffuser section and compressor housing standard . The larger diameter cast in back plate is the main difference in the centre sections .

If you go back far enough at Evomnet you can read about the early 5/10 blade compressor in the "old school FP Evo Green" turbo . The modern replacement wheel is the HTA68 which makes a late "Evo White" turbo upgrade to a std Evo 9 turbo . It's supposed to give around 10% greater flow over the 16G with virtually no lag increase .

Past this you get into larger heavier turbines starting with the SL2 etc and inertia is inertia . I can't remember which is the smallest FP BB turbo possibly the Green .

A tuner I've used doesn't think some of these coloured turbos are much chop down low and reckoned they only really came alive around 4000 , not sure if that was bush or BB ones .

Mick it depends on what numbers you want and how much lag you can live with . I'd like more torque in my 6 and getting that from a bog stock engine isn't difficult . If it was me and I was staying with std capacity I'd look at the larger turbine housing and the 68HTA in a 9 cartridge/comp housing . I think you probably want more than that so I'm going to say the BB HTA Green because it can be upgraded if it falls short of your expectations .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

I love the response of the stock turbo disco and would like to stay kinda close to that. Yes the green is the smallest of the "coloured turbos" Im definitely leaning towards the HTA green in BB form as ive read alot saying they really do make the JB models feel doughy.

I think the 300-320kw zone would be nice with close to stock response as my car comes to life SO early but does sign off up top a lil.

So ive even set the rev limiter to 7200.

In 2nd gear the 9 starts to really fly not much after 3000 so getting that and some again around 3500 really makes these lil suckers hard to catch on the street as they come to life so quickly :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...