Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is Leesh's build thread. There is no qualitative goal here, as she already looks good. Leesh will simply be riding the wave of getting stronger and enjoying the benefits that come with that, at her own pace. Progress will be detailed here.

Leesh now @ 56kg

k9jNaRhG_original.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428501-project-anything-is-possible/
Share on other sites

12/07/13

Flat Bench

25kg x10

30kg x10

30kg x10

35kg x 10

40kg x 1

Close Grip Lat Pulldown

30kg x 10

30kg x 10

40kg x 10

40kg x 10

50kg x 10

50kg x 10

55kg x 5

Incline Press

20kg x 10

20kg x 10

22.5kg x 10

22.5kg x 10

25kg x 10

25kg x 10

Leg Press

60kg x 10

70kg x 10

80kg x 10

90kg x 10

100kg x 10

Squats

20kg x 10

30kg x 10

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

40kg x 10

42.5kg x 10

45kg x 3 (failed on 4th)

Tricep Push Down (double pulley)

25kg x 10

25kg x 10

30kg x 10

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

35kg x 10

Captains Chair Knee Raises

10

10

10

10

10

13/07/13

Standing Shoulder Press

15kg x 10

15kg x 10

15kg x 10

15kg x 10

20kg x 7

20kg x 6

Seated Row

25kg x 10

25kg x 10

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

40kg x 8

40kg x 8

Decline Bench

30kg x 10

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

35kg x 10

40kg x 6

40kg x 6

Wide Grip Lat Pulldown

30kg x 10

30kg x 10

40kg x 10

40kg x 10

50kg x 10

50kg x 10

55kg x 3

Deadlifts

40kg x 10

50kg x 10

50kg x 10

60kg x 10

60kg x 3

Bicep Curls

10kg x 10

10kg x 10

10kg x 10

10kg x 10

15kg x 10

15kg x 10

Aww shit Leesh has a build thread (courtesy of the Birdman :P)! Jesus, never really clicked to me when seeing your impressive numbers that you'd also be doing them in the volume of Birds' program. Well done, that's just another whole level of impressive :P

Keep it up.

Aww shit Leesh has a build thread (courtesy of the Birdman :P)! Jesus, never really clicked to me when seeing your impressive numbers that you'd also be doing them in the volume of Birds' program. Well done, that's just another whole level of impressive :PKeep it up.

Told you I lift ;)

Thanks for the support

Aww shit Leesh has a build thread (courtesy of the Birdman :P)! Jesus, never really clicked to me when seeing your impressive numbers that you'd also be doing them in the volume of Birds' program. Well done, that's just another whole level of impressive :PKeep it up.

BVT

Birds Volume Training!

  • Like 1

15/07/13

Flat Bench

25kg x 10

30kg x 10

35kg x 8

40kg x 3

42.5kg x 2

Squats

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

35kg x 10

40kg x 10

42.5kg x 10

45kg x 5

Close Grip Lat Pulldown

30kg x 10

40kg x 10

40kg x 10

50kg x 10

50kg x 10

55kg x 6

60kg x 1

Incline Press

20kg x 10

20kg x 10

22.5kg x 10

22.5kg x 10

25kg x 10

25kg x 10

30kg x 3

Tricep Pushdown (double pulley)

25kg x 10

25kg x 10

30kg x 10

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

35kg x 10

Captains Chair Knee Raises

20

20

20

20

Birds and Leesh may have different views, but in the past, when I was doing multiple sets of 10, I found I was far leaner and more defined. This is not necessarily at the expense of strength either, just depends on how you train.

What's your main reason for more volume as apposed to more weight and less reps?

I'm thinking about giving this ago as I can't lift much due to a bung shoulder.

There's no scientific reason for it, I don't know enough about that lol. I've just always felt that volume training works well for maintaining a lean, athletic looking body and good mental / physical endurance (slow twitch fibers etc.). Seems to be less prone to injury due to less weight (no slip in technique, particularly training without a coach) and it also gives you a bit of a cardio workout at the same time, particularly with the compounds.

We use low rep / 1RM training at the end of the sets to introduce new weight when we feel we are ready to step up. To me this has always been about training to have more left in the tank no matter what you've been doing beforehand / how crap you feel. Again, no scientific basis, but I love training this way.

I have introduced it to a few people and the result is usually a decent amount of muscle and fat loss, even with an average diet. If you look up German Volume Training, some of the principles are similar, albeit with slightly less sets.

It's not the most efficient way to build strength, but I find it works fairly well on that part, too, as long as you're not looking to be a power lifter,

  • Like 1

It's more for getting the body to adapt better. I think it will help with pushing to the next level of strength and making those muscle fibres bigger. Drop sets, super-sets and pyramid sets seem to work for me :) I always make sure that I don't go light. High volume but keeping the reps lower I find helps me. Unless it's pure strength training, than 1-3 reps.

Leesh noticed this comment from Bulk Nutrients today during their lunchtime Q & A

When it comes to "bulking up with muscle" in regards to a female - ask any of our top female professionals on this very Facebook page how extremely DIFFICULT this is to do for a woman. It will not happen over night and it sure won't be the cause of a protein powder. Sure, carb and fat bulk can happen rapidly, as well as a heap of water build up, but in no way will muscle suddenly just appear on a female without some serious serious planning and dedication.

That is from Bulk in regards to a women asking about a powder that wont make her bulk up much, but I thought it was appropriate to some of the things you have said.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...