Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have you thought about cams - before you go looking at a turbo or while you choose a turbo system?

Yes, just something I haven't done, im happy with it all how it is, my excellent fuel economy, peak power at over 7000, nice idle etc etc

And how about the off boost effort of these mentioned turbo's in regards to say being in 5th at 3k doing 110-120 and flooring it? the t04z makes about 4-5 pound at 3k and 100kw, but 2000 revs later its well over 300kw.. what do these all make by 3k power and boost wise?

Well as an example if i squeeze the throttle on the Freeway at 110km/h it cracks gate :laugh: Takes a few more psi that 5 to do that as the boost controller was set at 20 :yes:

Yes, just something I haven't done, im happy with it all how it is, my excellent fuel economy, peak power at over 7000, nice idle etc etc

Poncams :yes:

Poncams :yes:

Agreed. I think you will be suprised at what a set of mild cams + cam gears will do...

I think you should consider it, because a better cam profile CAN actually give you more lowdown torque.

Agreed. I think you will be suprised at what a set of mild cams + cam gears will do...

I think you should consider it, because a better cam profile CAN actually give you more lowdown torque.

Can get you more wimminz too i believe!

  • Like 1

how does trents hub dyno compare to roller dyno figures around the vic area stao?

not in vic area, but when car was 300kw it made 4kw less going from a dyno dynamics to a dynapack setup on sae, also looked lazy in the mid range on the dynapack

Im still unsure, What could you do to my current turbo for much better response Stao?

And furthermore, I really like the efr 8374, but is it a bit on the big side for my levels?

Just not sure what will come on faster and not be restricting ?? The hta seems promising too

Im still unsure, What could you do to my current turbo for much better response Stao?

And furthermore, I really like the efr 8374, but is it a bit on the big side for my levels?

Just not sure what will come on faster and not be restricting ?? The hta seems promising too

Sure I can. it will cost you $650 including the turbine housing, and if you don't need it back in a hurry I can do some dyno runs with it for comparison for your final decision.

Sure I can. it will cost you $650 including the turbine housing, and if you don't need it back in a hurry I can do some dyno runs with it for comparison for your final decision.

Im quite interested, what will you do to it? New wheels and tighter rear?

Looking at dyno runs my 22psi is on at just over 5k, how much lower can you make this would you say?

Id love it to come on hard at 4 on the dot if your able to do this?

Also a bit more off boost would be mint.

Keep in mind I have a 1.05 rear so that could go .83 with no ill effects?

This just seems smarter if it will work, saves me 1500 bucks too

Im still unsure, What could you do to my current turbo for much better response Stao?

And furthermore, I really like the efr 8374, but is it a bit on the big side for my levels?

Just not sure what will come on faster and not be restricting ?? The hta seems promising too

The EFR8374 isnt that big? Its not really bigger then the HTA3582. Similar powerlevels, but far better transient response.

6262? Didnt mention it because im bored man. They love these things on evos for a reason. They are weapon

6262 is quite big. They love them, but they are laggy compaired to the HTA3582 and the EFR8374.

Edited by Tonba

The EFR8374 isnt that big? Its not really bigger then the HTA3582. Similar powerlevels, but far better transient response.

6262 is quite big. They love them, but they are laggy compaired to the HTA3582 and the EFR8374.

Sounds like you've got specs in a bit of a knot :P

PT6262, EFR8374 and HTA3586 are probably closest to each other in power potential. HTA3582 is a slight step down in potential power from those 3... I'd look at it like this

Power potential (give or take)

1=) PT6262/EFR8374/HTA3586

2) HTA3582

Response (give or take)

1=) HTA3582/EFR8374

2=) PT6262/HTA3586

Again, general thumbsucks extrapolating from results and comments from people who I've spoken to who have driven the setups - I'd not take it as gospel so much as a general idea of where they roughly stand. I actually suspect the HTA3586 would be slightly more responsive than the 6262 but given my lack of direct experience and knowing the following the 6262 has I'll leave it there.

The EFR8374 is a beast for the response it can provide for the power it can make. The HTA3582 would be ultra responsive, potentially a little more so but again - my lack of direct experience with the EFR means i'll leave that there too and say its just the impression I have from extrapolation.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi 🙋‍♂️. Just bought my Unicorn but the interior need some minor work so it would match my expectations ;). I noticed it is hard to get used oem floor mats in good condition so i started to dig if there's any chance to buy set of new ones. I found two websites - nengun and amayama and it looks like one can still buy factory new floor mats in Japan, but thers a small issue. Some mats (i assume genuine, oem ones) are marked as G4900 and these are "discontinued". The ones you can buy are marked as G4911 but i have no idea if these are also oem, made by other producer or some lower quality replacements that looks entirely different. Can anyone help? 😃  P.s. there is also some strange indication - 0V005, 0V015 and 0V505. Any idea what does it mean? Would appreciate any help with this 🙏
    • Hi, Marek here 🙋‍♂️. I finally fulfilled my longtime dream - recently bought Stagea and now waiting for it to arrive in Poland. There's only few of these in my country, and one of the owners  recommended mi this forum as a source of all the info i'd need since now i own one  so here i am.  
    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
×
×
  • Create New...