Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so thought i would UP this. Looks extremely good and is also running on a new engine compared to the old MW 3. Due out 5/11/2013

Call of Duty: Ghosts is the next game in the Call of Duty series set to release in 2013. The new Infinity Ward team has been working on an entirely new storyline and engine, which is said to bring Call of Duty to the next generation. Ghosts will be available on both of current systems, theXbox One and the PlayStation 4. At Microsoft's Xbox reveal conference, Activision announced that Xbox One owners will receive timed DLCexclusives

The Story of Call of Duty: Ghosts takes place a few years after the USA has fallen. The remaining soldiers fight in guerrilla warfare to stay alive and take back their country. Promises some good things. Video of the new engine here

CODGhostsGoodBoy.jpg

CODGhosts_UnderwaterAmbush.jpg

CODGhosts_ServerRoomTakedown.jpg

Edited by Frosty
  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428872-call-of-duty-ghosts/
Share on other sites

I'm not to sure about this one. Alot of the times the trailers make the game look like it is going to be amazing fun to play and then for whatever reason they dont deliver. Hoping to be proven wrong, and I'll probably no doubt buy it anyway, but BO2 looked amazing, but didnt deliver as much as MW3 for me. I still play BO2 though, still good fun

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

so now that this is out i gotta say im a bit disappointed with the game as a whole. TDM seems to be a 1 hit 1 kill kinda thing and you always get owned. Single player was rather average aswell

on the other hand extinction isnt bad and is a take on treyachs zombies idea. Pretty fun

Anyone been finding squads ultra laggy? I can shoot at the bots and then they turn and kill me then on the killcam ive only fired about 3 bullets before Ive died

Fairly disappointed. Will keep playing for a while but not sure how long that will last. Maybe it will be better on ps4

so now that this is out i gotta say im a bit disappointed with the game as a whole. TDM seems to be a 1 hit 1 kill kinda thing and you always get owned. Single player was rather average aswell

on the other hand extinction isnt bad and is a take on treyachs zombies idea. Pretty fun

A mate has it and agrees. He said there's no shortage of quickscopers either...it's worse than ever.

Anyone been finding squads ultra laggy? I can shoot at the bots and then they turn and kill me then on the killcam ive only fired about 3 bullets before Ive died

Fairly disappointed. Will keep playing for a while but not sure how long that will last. Maybe it will be better on ps4

havent had any issues with lag yet. only played for like TDM for like 20mins as it was utter sh!t. Did play online for like an hr or 2 with the extinction map. No lag issues there.

Loading time is fuber aswell. tho after GTA V it seems reasonable lol

Might have just been to much traffic when I was on. Have played before and has been alright.

Feeling it might be time to switch to battlefield but..... at least till next cod with zombies. Extinction is pretty good but

I had my first go tonight, I like it! I find you spawn into the action straight away. You can't presume you'll have to run to the action, you're in it! I like the physics of it, seems to move well.

Played the Battlefield beta and was disappointed.... Offers SOOOOOO much and BF just never quite delivers for me.

I've ordered a Sex Box One with COD, Forza 5 and Watch Dogs (when it eventually makes it). See what COD is like on that, better be amazing...

I play Hardcore only (once you can) so I don't mind the one shot kill thing.... But in non hardcore I could see how it would be annoying. I watched a Youtube video and they were saying they made it a lot harder to quick scope so interested to hear that there seems to be more doing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...