Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Fair bit of talk about the ethanol content in the pump fuel available (united, caltex etc).

There are plenty of people that have spent the money on content analysers, but plenty who haven't.
I thought it would be useful for those that don't have the analysers to have a place to come to check recent fuel batch quality.


So, just tell us when you bought the fuel, where and the ethanol content you're seeing. Don't write about fuel you bought last year, just recent examples. I hope for this to be a regularly updated thread.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/429109-pump-e85-current-ethanol-content/
Share on other sites

This thread will be pretty useless as Caltex Eflex is pretty consistant at 70-72 with nearly no variation and i believe United is sitting steady at 85.

/thread.

well piggaz has seen 77 up to about 87 at united servo at rozelle. I'm not a tuner, but suspect that if your car is tuned on e85 and your buying e77 fuel (or potentially worse) then you could run into some problems.

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

well piggaz has seen 77 up to about 87 at united servo at rozelle. I'm not a tuner, but suspect that if your car is tuned on e85 and your buying e77 fuel (or potentially worse) then you could run into some problems.

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

Maybe the marine grade for boats is different :P

  • Like 1

A friend of mine cracked all 6 pistons recently because of a bad batch of E85.. Apparently the content changes with the weather.. For example if you car was tuned in summer it would have been tuned with a higher ethanol content because in winter they add more pump fuel because the ethanol does not vaporize as easily in the cold..

Just what I have been told I'm not a scientist or anything..

A friend of mine cracked all 6 pistons recently because of a bad batch of E85.. Apparently the content changes with the weather.. For example if you car was tuned in summer it would have been tuned with a higher ethanol content because in winter they add more pump fuel because the ethanol does not vaporize as easily in the cold..

Just what I have been told I'm not a scientist or anything..

Sounds more like a bad tune or some other form of failure! E85 has not been known to cause any major issues without there being an outside influence of some form!

Like I said.. I have no clue just what I've been told.. I'm not on E85 just yet but with pump fuel going to $1.80/L I think it's time to invest.

I know, its just comments like that from your mate that give people the wrong idea about Ethanol, there are so many cars running it daily and/or running it under extreme conditions with big power output and having no issues, there are some big $ and high HP cars running it with no issues, these are not the sort of builds you would expect people to run the risk of a dodgy fuel on.

Given that we know that once you get the ethanol content up above about 40% you gain pretty much all the cooling and det resistance benefits of 85% ethanol, and given that we know that even the most variable stuff doesn't anywhere near <50%, surely there is room here to debunk the myths?

The other way to look at it is that as the ethanol % falls from some high value (say you tuned at a true E85) down to a low % (say it bottoms out at 60%) then the true amount of fuel is so very very high that the exhaust temps will still be low and the car will in fact struggle to make power. Instead it will make lots of black smoke.

You are more at risk of tuning it at the ragged edge (if you can find it) at E70 and then getting some true E85 into it and running a bit lean. Then you might get into some grief.

I know, its just comments like that from your mate that give people the wrong idea about Ethanol, there are so many cars running it daily and/or running it under extreme conditions with big power output and having no issues, there are some big $ and high HP cars running it with no issues, these are not the sort of builds you would expect people to run the risk of a dodgy fuel on.

This is running a straight E85 tune.. No flex sensor yet.. Might have caused it to lean out also..

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

I'd have to disagree with that. United are pretty spot on, from what I've seen. Caltex seems to vary just that little bit more than United.

Either way, just pull back the tune a bee's dick. When I was running the PFC/united tune, I ran Caltex in it and had no problems. That includes giving the car a flogging at hill climbs.

Ive been running pump e85 for last 3 years in my drift car and had it tuned for caltex and have switched between united and caltex on same tune and have had no worries engine still going as strong as ever, all comes down to how well its tuned to compensate for the changes.

I'd have to disagree with that. United are pretty spot on, from what I've seen. Caltex seems to vary just that little bit more than United.

Either way, just pull back the tune a bee's dick. When I was running the PFC/united tune, I ran Caltex in it and had no problems. That includes giving the car a flogging at hill climbs.

I've had a consistant reading the whole time!

This was early on in the piece though, a few years ago. My car was off the road for a while there also. Maybe they have picked up their game?

Mine has been over the past 14-15 mths i think! So possibly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...