Jump to content
SAU Community

O2 sensor


JaFF

Recommended Posts

Get hold of a consult cable and use nistune or ecutalk and look at the O2 voltages, then check the coolant temp readings as well, might be a stuffed temp sensor meaning it is always running in cold start enrichment mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as they said :) thats how i nutted out that mine was an o2 sensor issue (consult cable). and its fun doing fast and furious hecticness with your laptop on your passenger seat >_<

PS watch your floor doesnt fall out when you slam your laptop shut

seriously tho, o2 sensors are an awesome thing to replace. my car loved it. even in the city i get 450-500 to a tank....and the highway out west.......600+ (not entirely thanks to the new o2 sensor, but it helped smoother idle etc)

Edited by boiracer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the oxygen sensor can be very expensive, the problem may not with oxygen sensor itself, but may be other factors, it is a good idea to test your oxygen sensor before replacing it. Usually, a check engine light will provide the first indication that you might have a bad O2 sensor.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the oxygen sensor can be very expensive, the problem may not with oxygen sensor itself, but may be other factors, it is a good idea to test your oxygen sensor before replacing it. Usually, a check engine light will provide the first indication that you might have a bad O2 sensor.

Since when does this ever happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK so after going through a 21 page clusterf**k, I ended up buying 2 x NTK OZA395-E2 sensors from Kudos for my R33 GTR.

One sensor will clip in perfectly, the other I just need to swap the plug from the old one.

I found out my sensors were dead when I hooked up my Blazt Consult Cable and saw my sensors were just flat lining during idle and not osculating like they should.

I think I might write up a full DIY PDF for those interested instead of spending hours like I did finding the right information.

Usually, a check engine light will provide the first indication that you might have a bad O2 sensor.

My light has never come on. I think it only would if the sensor(s) weren't connected at all (because no voltage is being received). Datascan also hasn't reported any error codes from the ECU either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished fitting the new NTK sensors after tedious hours of replacing the old ones and went for a test drive.

All I can say is HOLY SHITBALLS, I can't believe all my problems have disappeared.

- Idle is now very stable and smooth and not muddy like before

- Noticeable difference in responsiveness

- Definitely increased power

- No more wastegate flutter under light boost - this was pissing me off the most and couldn't for the hell of me figure out what was causing it.

- Cruising - smooooth like it should be

I'm gonna go fill up with a full tank and see what the economy is like. Before I was only getting 350km/50L.

Will post up some Consult Cable results of before and after.

great-success.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok analyst report:

Following this tutorial on the RB26 was probably the most helpful guide I've ever come across.

I followed pretty much every step apart from the splicing the right-hand (RH) sensor wires which wasn't necessary. I just unclipped the pins out of the rectangle plug and switched them to the existing square plug. The other sensor was a straight replacement.

Anyone doing this on the RB26 definately needs to use a 22mm sensor remover socket with a universal joint. It's pretty much impossible to reach otherwise. WD40 is also a must to "crack" the sensors loose with enough leverage.

When I removed the old sensors, I wasn't surprised how burnt out they looked:

post-47343-0-80023800-1297836018_thumb.jpg

Using the Blazt Consult Cable with Nissan DataScan, was able to get a comparison, idling @ 1500RPM:

OLD SENSORS:

post-47343-0-99448700-1297836223_thumb.jpg

NEW SENSORS:

post-47343-0-59386600-1297836239_thumb.jpg

As you can see, there's quite a difference. And just comes to show how f**ked the old ones were, causing my car to run rich constantly. The RH sensor was quite literally off the chart.

If your sensors aren't osculating like mine were before, then I would look at replacing them asap ;)

Have already done 35km's to work and home on a full tank. Fuel gauge has barely moved at all :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just replaced my O2 sensor. It would run rough at lower cruising speeds (like when traveling around car parks). My tuner told me that it was the oxygen sensor heat senso that had gone. It would only do it once the exhaust started cooling down. It would do it more so we thought, because I had a 3" turbo back exhaust aswell which would cool down much faster. My tuner said it was making little adjustments the and that is what caused it to go wierd. I also got bad economy...maybe 350-400km a tank with mixed town and country driving.

Since changing it I have done half a tank and am definitely using less fuel. BUT it is still doing a stuttering at particular times at idle cruze. It sounds like a rotary sometimes when the exhaust cools down lol.

The O2 sensor didn't come with instructions so I hope I installed it right. It had three wires, two white and one black. It didn't know which white wires went around which way so I just crimped them hoping I got it right. Is there any specific way they are suppose to go even though they look the same?

My tuner also said that he wouldn't be a 100% sure a new O2 sensor would fix the rough cruise since it may be because the exhaust is so free flowing unlike stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it to be a real stab in the dark when I was trying to find the cause of my idle/cruise stuttering. Using the Blazt Consult Cable showed me what sensors were the culprit

I don't think the exhaust size would have too much of an influence on your issue, since the o2 sensor is on the upper manifold next to the engine.

If you're already noticing better fuel efficiency then I guess you did wire up the sensor wires correctly.

Next you might want to look at cleaning your AFM's if you haven't before. AFM's need cleaning every now and then because oily residue builds up on the sensor components. This could also be sending false readings to your ECU.

Get some "CRC Air Flow Sensor Cleaner" available at Supercheap or Autobarn: http://www.superchea...=157339#details

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O2 sensor didn't come with instructions so I hope I installed it right. It had three wires, two white and one black. It didn't know which white wires went around which way so I just crimped them hoping I got it right. Is there any specific way they are suppose to go even though they look the same?

You have a zirconia sensor, they have 3 wires, 1 black and 2 white, both white wires are heaters so it doesn't matter which way they go. Whereas titania is different and it does matter, red wire is the heater positive (also doubles as the incoming signal wire) and white wire is the heater negative

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What "kills" on O2 sensor? excessive heat or excessive unburnt fuel (carbon)? Reason i ask is my 34r runs a Nismo stage1 (aka "generic") tuned ecu. the car does run quite rich. I know my 02 sensors need replacing but will the current rich tune kill the new 02 sensors? should i wait until i do PFC & tune and then replace the 02 sensors then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...