Jump to content
SAU Community

O2 sensor


JaFF

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

hey guys im looking for a r34 gtt o2 sensor, i just read that the r33 sensor is the same just different plug? is that true? coz its like half the price for the r34 gtt sensor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I plugged in my consult today and the o2 sensor plays around at .70 to .80 volts, is it busted, could that be why I'm only getting 200kms to a tank, if so where's the best place to get a brand new one, there's no point in getting a second hand, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I bought an aftermarket one off kudos motorsports which plugs straight in (highly recommended trader)

Didn't really improve my fuel economy but i do 90% city driving. I wonder whether the geniune item which is double the price can do a better job...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought an aftermarket one off kudos motorsports which plugs straight in (highly recommended trader)

Didn't really improve my fuel economy but i do 90% city driving. I wonder whether the geniune item which is double the price can do a better job...

It either works or it doesn't there isn't much to them. If it is working then buying another working one will produce basically identical results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Fellas:

100% confirmed that NGK / NTK part no: OZA395-E2 can fit in an r34 GT-T and does work.

100% confirmed the plug DOESN'T FIT, however the switch is extremely simple.

im getting MUCH better fuel economy since installing the Zirconia 3-Wire, 22mm O2 sensor for the 32 / 33.

stop paying $220 for the original one!!!

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Installed Power FC - doing basic setup for a tune as suggested in the Power FC FAQ.

Whenever I put it into closed loop mode it starts to idle really rough, A/F goes very rich on my wideband (12:1), and it barely drives. If I take it out of closed loop it runs richer than standard ECU but idles and drives normally.

I know closed loop relies on the oxygen sensor to trim fuel at steady accelerator levels - so does the above indicate it is stuffed? I did a sensor check at idle through the hand coontroller and it sat at 1.3 V. i revved it and it didn't change? Is it time for a new one?

Thanks,

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Installed Power FC - doing basic setup for a tune as suggested in the Power FC FAQ.

Whenever I put it into closed loop mode it starts to idle really rough, A/F goes very rich on my wideband (12:1), and it barely drives. If I take it out of closed loop it runs richer than standard ECU but idles and drives normally.

I know closed loop relies on the oxygen sensor to trim fuel at steady accelerator levels - so does the above indicate it is stuffed? I did a sensor check at idle through the hand coontroller and it sat at 1.3 V. i revved it and it didn't change? Is it time for a new one?

Thanks,

Pete

yes

you may also be able to run a simulated output from your wideband to the ecu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool - thanks mate! I'll read the wideband manual regarding the simulated output function.

Also, does anyone know how the cheaper NGK ones compare to the more expensive OEM Nissan ones? I checked them both out on Kudos' site.

Thanks again!

**SORRY for the double post - didn't think the stupid phone uploaded the first one!**

Edited by Peter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...