Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We suspect backyard Bob modified these side feed injectors to flow more. The problem is that they don't flow very even as per report, although there is more to it, as it is hard to see in the picture but they are all in different rotation, or sequence, in reference to the injector plug location. The flow test showed even worse as not matched very well and they also did atomise very well, more like jets and pointing in different directions.

See picture of one of the injectors magnified showing uneven hole size and spacing.

post-2671-0-85980200-1378090184_thumb.jpg

post-2671-0-74996100-1378090146_thumb.jpg

post-2671-0-80468200-1378090202_thumb.jpg



Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/431200-beware-of-modified-injectors/
Share on other sites

Fair enough. I am just trying to understand the message you are wanting to convey... Should we just be avoiding modified injectors in general or is there a particular injector mob producing these?

I am running a modified injector which looks just like what you have posted, but they work a treat. So I am curious what you have got there.

I think its just a warning to be careful of people selling high flowed injectors. I know when its done right it isnt a problem, but asking for flow reports etc before buying I think is the message here?

They look pretty horrible either way. Definetly wouldn't want them on my car

They are a very precise item and if done correctly they are ok, but these ones were clearly not.

Keep in mind when tuning a Skyline you are measuring air fuel ratio of a combination of six injectors. One could be very lean and you may not know. If in doubt get them tested.

There are other tell tale signs of poor injector quality. Consistency in the mixture when going from WOT to cruise and the burn across the plugs mean a lot.

I run the Five O motorsports injectors which are a Jecs injector rebuilt to whatever size you buy it as. Unigroup gave me the lecture before I took the car in but everything turned out mickey mouse. I have not seen a better burn across a set of plugs. Idle quality and economy are all up there too, but they look exactly like the ones posted above (except the pintle caps). They even have a number engraved (yet I believe mine have a serial number engraved so you know which one matches what on the flow report). Or it could be a 3 digit CC reading, I can't remember.

Anywho, thus my curiosity. These could be SRDE injectors backyarded like you said.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...