Jump to content
SAU Community

new Skyline GT-R35 Picture Colletion


Recommended Posts

dont like the grille on the red one i agree looks a lot like a subaru all it needs is the covers down in the bumper where the fogs would be with sti printed on them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he said gtr35 i think that he meant to say gtr 35 as in 35 series gtr not r35 gtr

but yes youre right its rumoured to be the v35 series gtr

r was for the rb series engine and the current models dont have the rb series anymore they have the nissan global engine platform the v series

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spot on... if anything the next GTR will be the V35 GTR, just like the C10 GTR, the C110 GTR, C210 GTR, R32 GTR, R33 GTR, R34 GTR, V35 GTR.

that photochop red car has the worst photoshopped on badge I've ever seen in my life.

And since when did GTR's come with sunroofs... wtf its supposed to be a race bred car not a luxury car... if you're gonna photochop, do it right I say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the photoshop was done by a nice dude on automotive forums named illracer, as you can see in the pic.

it's been stolen and put in mags a few times already lol :(

here's the orig thread:

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/...8&highlight=r35

edit: and he didn't do it to abide by the standards of superskyline enthusiests, the original shot (infiniti g35) had a sunroof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok the first thumbnail is ok probably my fave one of the pics you have posted looks more like the total package rather than pieces of different cars all photochopped together

the second one just doesnt look agressive enough for me needs a more agressive bodykit. the car looks nice and low and wide but it has a face that looks better on a sports luxury car rather than a performance icon like the skyline.

the second last photo looks way too plain the back end is too flat no detail and the bumper needs work

what can i say about the last one looks like someone hire oliver boulay from mitsubishi who did a good job at making the magna look fugly and applied his talents to the v35 yuk

v35 magna line ha ha! :(

EDIT:- or maybe it wasnt oliver boulay i cant remember whether he styled the BMW 7 series or the Magna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDIT:- or maybe it wasnt oliver boulay i cant remember whether he styled the BMW 7 series or the Magna

Yes that was the one, That was who I was thinking of in that other thread, Chris Bangle designed the Beemer.

All designs for the V35 I have seen have been ugly, except this one I would have seen about 2-3 years ago...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PHOTOCHOOOOOOOOOOP!!!

[/size]

What can I say? Goddam it... don't post up American visionary pictures (the Red one) of the V35 GT-R! The Americans only JUST jumped on the Skyline bandwagon after a "certain" Hollywood movie was released... THEY. KNOW. NOTHING. I don't care what they say (I'm good friends with a US "GT-R" fanatic, and he's ghey...:)) Infiniti G35 or no Infiniti G35, they don't know shit about Skylines... excuse my French.

Trust me... all you need to know about the V35 GT-R up until now has already been posted on SAU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the third thumbnail's the concept Skyline that was revealed at Takyo Motorshow and now resides in the Nissan Skyline Museum.

Sweet, where abouts is the Museum. Its going down on my 'Definates' on places to visit next year :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gtr69 those pics are just photochops of an r34 with a  more angualr design arent they?

Most likely, I can't see it looking anything like this in production, unfortunatly :)

The red one wouldn't show up for mr before, but I don't think it looks too bad, and good compared the the others in the 1st post.....too bad it isn't real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-posted by funkymonkey  

And since when did GTR's come with sunroofs... wtf its supposed to be a race bred car not a luxury car... if you're gonna photochop, do it right I say.

Let's see one of you efforts then, you photochop GOD :slap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...