Jump to content
SAU Community

What Cams To Go With On Rb26 Build.

MJTru

By MJTru,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

MJTru Mentor

MJTru

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ok I have been asking for advice on my build and as we speak. I have got the following parts.

1. Set of rods and pistons. Manley rods with 625 bolts, cp pistons with 9310 pins.

2. Tomie over size oil pump

3. ACL race bearings.

4. ARP head studs and main studs.

5. Cometic 1.3mm thick head gasket

6. 1.1 head oil restrictor

7. Supertech intake and exhaust valve seals.

8. Head oil drain kit.

9. New OEM cam and rear oil seals.

Im waiting on a new oem crank with the long oil pump drive and a new cylinder head. With some valve and spring. Then I can start the build.

I have a few queation regarding a set of new hks cams and for my goal of 600 hp should I use them. I plan on drag racing the car more than driving ir on the streets. I have a stock r33 gtr for street use.

The cams specs are stock lift but 272 duration. I dont have much experience with cames as I always go stock cams on my builds. The biggest difference going from a gtst to a gtr is that I just launch the hell out the gtr rpms are in the 8000 area all the time. Will these cams help me or slow me down for my 600hp goal.

My next problem is. I know of the rb oil issues and have never had real big oil pump failures in the past. Thats on rb25 builds. Now with this new oil pump. (Tomie) should I go with the ovwrsize oil pan or is it a waist of money?? I see that Raw Brakerage has a service to inlarge my pan for 1100 usd. They also put the head return on the pan but on the intake side. Is this a good idea.

Edited by MJTru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434325-what-cams-to-go-with-on-rb26-build/
Share on other sites
sleptema Proficient

sleptema

Posted
Posted

I am definatly no expert on this topic but I would have thought your valve train would be the most limiting factor on deciding what cams you go, not power. I personally would go high lift high duration because an increase throughout the entire powerband would be advantageous. But I assume you are worried about valve float because of the high rpm launches?

MJTru Mentor

MJTru

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I didnt choose these cams they came with the motor from japan. Valve float did cross my mind. The turbo is a PT 6262.

I personally was planning on selling them and going for stock ones, cams that is. I got the set of valve springs for stock lift. I was told that I can increase the lift a little. But will be fine use the hks cams. Yes I was told by the old owner of the car that the cams are stock lift and 272 duration. These numbers didnt come from me but the person who got them. In my head thats risky.

Im already turned off. So I guess ill just get a set of stock cams.

I can remember reading an old thread where people made better power using there oem cams over several brands out there. It had mentioned that if the whole valve train wasnt looked at it may be better to go back to the stock cams.

Any ideas on the oil pan.

KiwiRS4T Grand Master

KiwiRS4T

Posted
Posted

Any ideas on the oil pan.

Read the oil control thread or if you don't want to read all of it just the first few and last 10 pages say.

The Tomei pump should not fail but it can empty your sump. The restrictor will help. The head "drain" will not but if you are going to fit it the exhaust side is preferred. The enlarged sump is also good insurance against engine failure...although the price looks high - are there alternatives? I would recommend drilling and tapping two holes as high as possible in the inlet side which you can plug if you are not going to run breathers. That way if you do decide you need breathers later you won't have to pull the engine and remove the sump.

MJTru Mentor

MJTru

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I have done a lot of reading in those threads but thats about a year ago. I decided to go with the head drain as insurance. I understand by putting the restictor in the head will reduce the amount of oil in the head and really make the head drain redundant.

I was looking over the oil pumps manual and it does say that I need a enlarged oil pan.

Does anyone know of another option thats cheaper that 1100 usd offered by raw brokerage. It looks to be a very clean unit with extended oil pick up and oil pan baffles.

As for the cam. Yes sir. Its intended for drag racing. I will attach the supertech part number for the valve springs.

With such duration I will need stiffer springs to avoid floating valve effect right. This is the reason I want to post the part number I got.

I have heard that this duration will kill low end power but make up for it on the top end.

Can you please explain just a little about the subject. Like pros and cons.

Edited by MJTru
sleptema Proficient

sleptema

Posted
Posted

I have done a lot of reading in those threads but thats about a year ago. I decided to go with the head drain as insurance. I understand by putting the restictor in the head will reduce the amount of oil in the head and really make the head drain redundant.

I was looking over the oil pumps manual and it does say that I need a enlarged oil pan.

Does anyone know of another option thats cheaper that 1100 usd offered by raw brokerage. It looks to be a very clean unit with extended oil pick up and oil pan baffles.

As for the cam. Yes sir. Its intended for drag racing. I will attach the supertech part number for the valve springs.

With such duration I will need stiffer springs to avoid floating valve effect right. This is the reason I want to post the part number I got.

I have heard that this duration will kill low end power but make up for it on the top end.

Can you please explain just a little about the subject. Like pros and cons.

I was pretty sure tomei/hks/nismo did sump baffles, but nothing is going to be as reliable as an extended sump, especially at the high rpm for drag racing. I would do it just for the reliability of the engine.

I think by low end they mean 1-3k. Which for a drag car you will use 0% of the time. I believe the reason the low end suffers is because before the turbo begins to spool you are essentially trying to suck air in, and with a huge duration, it becomes null and void, but as soon as the boost kicks and it starts to push all the air in, the duration and lift begins to shine because you are able to force so much more air in, in comparison.

I am not sure about the figures, but I believe stock is 9.15 lift, 264 duration?, hks step2 is 10.15, 272 duration? That is hell of a lot more air. I was reading the rb26dett tuning page and it said someone got a 60hp increase just from cams and adjustable cam gears.

Obviously if money wasn't an issue, vct would make up for the loss of power low end...?

MJTru Mentor

MJTru

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Supertech SPRK-M1007S/RB

Specs:

Outer Spring O.D.: 28.10mm

Outer Spring I.D.: 20.00mm

Seat: 70 @ 40.7 (lbs@mm)

Open (lift): 188 @ 11 (lbs@mm)

Max net lift: 16.00mm

Coil bind: 24.70mm

Rate: 10.50 lbs/mm

KiwiRS4T Grand Master

KiwiRS4T

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know of another option thats cheaper that 1100 usd offered by raw brokerage. It looks to be a very clean unit with extended oil pick up and oil pan baffles.

These are popular here but freight might kill it for you:

http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/car-parts-accessories/nissan/engines/auction-654508309.htm

MJTru Mentor

MJTru

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Piggaz is right those are the stock cam specs.

But can anyone answer my question as to the supertch sping specs will work or not. Eather hks steps in sure of the duration, but ill mesure the lift today and tell you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • GTSBoy
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • GTSBoy
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • Kinkstaah
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...