Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What is it you disagree about?

I'm not here trolling, I've had a few gtr's in my past and I totally agree that 5-10 years ago they were unbeatable and other people would attempt to GP you not because they thought they could win but because they wanted to see what your car was capable of.

The GTR's back in the day had a heap of power compared to everything else, they now only have traction and weight on their side and have long been overtaken in the horsepower area by stock family cars.

What is it you disagree about?

I'm not here trolling, I've had a few gtr's in my past and I totally agree that 5-10 years ago they were unbeatable and other people would attempt to GP you not because they thought they could win but because they wanted to see what your car was capable of.

The GTR's back in the day had a heap of power compared to everything else, they now only have traction and weight on their side and have long been overtaken in the horsepower area by stock family cars.

I disagree with the horsepower statement, i think the RB26 is still up there if you were to compare true rwkw numbers, the new 325 315kw fpv or hsv whatever maybe higher. The only thing against the rb26 is ageing 20 year old engines in the r32, which ive had no troubles with yet fingers crossed.

I disagree with the horsepower statement, i think the RB26 is still up there if you were to compare true rwkw numbers, the new 325 315kw fpv or hsv whatever maybe higher. The only thing against the rb26 is ageing 20 year old engines in the r32, which ive had no troubles with yet fingers crossed.

Stock RB26 = ~170rwkw

Stock 6.0L v8 = 210rwkw

Stock 6.2L v8 = 260rwkw

Modifications is a moot point as they both respond fairly equally to modifications (except the current generation v8's and I6T's will handle quite a bit more horsepower in a stock bottom end) it really comes down to less weight and better traction for the R's.

The advantage of a gtr, is that it's a gtr and they have built up a reputation that proceeds them. Nothing puts a smile on my dial more watching someone's face drop as a 25 year old car flies past their 'supercar'. Can't blame people for trying though

  • Like 1

Silly debate. They are all cars with 4 wheels but that's where comparisons end. Too many variables.

That's where the track and classes sort it out.

On topic. Yes locally the number of numnuts lining up and racing on the streets has declined I think. At least in this town.

Although I still get the occasional ghetto ford or holden attempting to race my GTR (Bogans). 99.9% of the time I let them go and they're disappointed.

I will give it a short blat for young impressionable folk and it brings a smile or thumbsup. RBGROWL. I also like the roar of the older V8's - it is a magic sound.

Seeing a badge with 317kws is the one makes me smile every time lately.

You can profile people by their vehicle (sort of like pets looking like their owners)

An enthusiast appreciates any well turned out car. Stock or blown.

Racing strangers off the lights is for the young/dumb !

Edit: Skylines have lost ground and part of it's mystery go quick, Although the GTR badge still appears to retain respect.

Edited by Sinista32

So your comparing an1980s design / small capacity six cylinder against a late model v8 with more than twice the displacement?

Apples n oranges yeah?

Yeah, I'd say Nissan thought so too. Then the R35 came along... Let them have their displacement

  • Like 1

What is it you disagree about?

I'm not here trolling, I've had a few gtr's in my past and I totally agree that 5-10 years ago they were unbeatable and other people would attempt to GP you not because they thought they could win but because they wanted to see what your car was capable of.

The GTR's back in the day had a heap of power compared to everything else, they now only have traction and weight on their side and have long been overtaken in the horsepower area by stock family cars.

No way, these new family cars are still fairly slow. Most of them are like >1.75tons and only put out about 170-180kw. And those are the expensive ones. R32 GTR's would still leave >95% of cars on the road in dust.

Fairly slow yes but only due to lack of traction and a higher vehicle weight as I mentioned above a few times.

I gave you accurate power figures above and no not the expensive 1's the stock standard v8 or i6T models.

Yes they still would leave 95% of cars for dust, for the first 100 metres, after that it is purely horsepower.

I've been a proud Skyline owner for all of three weeks now ;-)

All I've done to my R-32 is take the boost restrictor out and I dyno at 196 rwkw - which is plenty for me.

Are there more powerful, faster stock family cars nowadays ?? Ofcourse there are. Will they beat me ?? Ofcourse they will.

But in the end - I am driving an R32 Skyline GTR VSpec 2 - and they are not - and I know who has the bigger smile :-)

For the comparison to be valid however, I would contend that the R32 should be measured against the cars of its era and if you want to throw in a VF-GTS, the accurate comparison is against the GTR of the day - which is the R35 - and we all know who wins.

BTW in terms of dollars - this comparison is still justified when looking at the prices of 1994.

The GTR was and remains an 'Apex' technology car.

Just my 2 c

  • Like 2

Also dollar for dollar you're better off with a skyline if you want go fast. You can buy a HSV or FPV or whatever for what, like $80000? Or you could buy an R34, forge the bottom end put a single turbo on it and tune it to E85 and you'd easily have over 400awkw in a lighter car for the same money. Also those V8s handle like yachts

  • Like 1

I'm from Bankstown!!

One thing ive noticed here, ever since the turbo restrictions, is a crapload of late 90s civics and pulsars full of p-platers who try out-penis each other with their awesome "flooring it" in first and second skills

On friday was on the M4 with my 35, and some dopey ass red p-plater did three fly-bys in the space of a few mins, with me doing a constant 110. He would just slow down then go around me, nearly falling over on the side in the process. The retard was on a mission to impress me with his triton ute.

I thought, meh, dont care, youre not worth my time and energy. Pretty much the same with most people who wanna race. Dont give a sh*t, i enjoy my cars in my own way, got nothing to prove to random tossers

Edited by junkie
  • Like 3

Fairly slow yes but only due to lack of traction and a higher vehicle weight as I mentioned above a few times.

I gave you accurate power figures above and no not the expensive 1's the stock standard v8 or i6T models.

Yes they still would leave 95% of cars for dust, for the first 100 metres, after that it is purely horsepower.

I dont know where your getting your comparisons from but from what ive seen, a gtr will not fall behind even in a rolling start, im not being biased towards turbos here, ive had V8's and switched to turbo a couple years back but the aussie V8's are just muscle cars not performance cars they will not match in any way shape or form, they really only perform well as dyno stars.

The OP didn't ask for a dollar vs dollar comparison, or a 1994 vs 1994 comparison, or a cubic capacity comparison the question was why don't people traffic light gp skylines anymore (ie in any make/model of car) and the answer is because they are no longer miles in front anymore (GTR's only, GTS-t's and GTT's lost that battle years ago) and other cars have caught up majorly in certain areas.

Have you ever pulled up at a set of lights and had an Evo want to run you only to put down your window and say "sorry mate but I only run against other cars made with a 2.6L twin cam twin turbo engine otherwise I wont get any street credit".

  • Like 1

The OP didn't ask for a dollar vs dollar comparison, or a 1994 vs 1994 comparison, or a cubic capacity comparison the question was why don't people traffic light gp skylines anymore (ie in any make/model of car) and the answer is because they are no longer miles in front anymore (GTR's only, GTS-t's and GTT's lost that battle years ago) and other cars have caught up majorly in certain areas.

Have you ever pulled up at a set of lights and had an Evo want to run you only to put down your window and say "sorry mate but I only run against other cars made with a 2.6L twin cam twin turbo engine otherwise I wont get any street credit".

Mate i replied directly to this topic stating what had happened to me followed by an opinion of mine, your the one that started this Jdm adm thing by replying to my reply. We'll agree to disagree, allow the OP his thread back. No hard feelings.

there is truth in this

The OP didn't ask for a dollar vs dollar comparison, or a 1994 vs 1994 comparison, or a cubic capacity comparison the question was why don't people traffic light gp skylines anymore (ie in any make/model of car) and the answer is because they are no longer miles in front anymore (GTR's only, GTS-t's and GTT's lost that battle years ago) and other cars have caught up majorly in certain areas.

Have you ever pulled up at a set of lights and had an Evo want to run you only to put down your window and say "sorry mate but I only run against other cars made with a 2.6L twin cam twin turbo engine otherwise I wont get any street credit".

Edited by Sinista32

The OP didn't ask for a dollar vs dollar comparison, or a 1994 vs 1994 comparison, or a cubic capacity comparison the question was why don't people traffic light gp skylines anymore (ie in any make/model of car) and the answer is because they are no longer miles in front anymore (GTR's only, GTS-t's and GTT's lost that battle years ago) and other cars have caught up majorly in certain areas.

Have you ever pulled up at a set of lights and had an Evo want to run you only to put down your window and say "sorry mate but I only run against other cars made with a 2.6L twin cam twin turbo engine otherwise I wont get any street credit".

Well then we could argue that no one bothers to race GTR's anymore because they know if they've spent as much money on their skyline as they have just buying their enormous road going boat they'll get beaten?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
    • OK, so a bunch of trim needs to come off to get to the rear shock top mounts. Once the seat is out of the way, the plastic trim needs to come off. Remove 2 clips at the top then slide the trim towards the centre of the car to clear the lower clip Next you need to be able to lift the parcel shelf, which means you need to remove the mid dark trim around the door, and then the upper light trim above the parcel shelf. The mid trim has a clip in the middle to remove first, then lift the lowest trim off the top of the mid trim (unclips). At the top there is a hidden clip on the inner side to release first by pulling inwards, then the main clip releases by pulling the top towards the front of the car. The door seal comes off with the trim, just put them aside. The the lighter upper trim, this is easy to break to top clips so take it carefully. There is a hidden clip towards the bottom and another in the middle to release first by pulling inwards. Once they are out, there are 3 clips along the rear windscreen side of the panel that are hard to get under. This is what the rear of the panel looks like to assist:
×
×
  • Create New...