Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just watching a James Allen interview with Webber...lol "advice for Daniel..." "Marks response "Kick his ass. I took him to the last race in 2010, he has to do one better " :) Flaming Champion. Cant wait to see him at Le Mans next year

Also funny to see Alonso saying "we will see Mark next year supporting us.." and laughing at the suggestion he will be rooting for Alonso and not RBR. Cant help but suspect there could be some truth to the statement

Marussia could merge with Sauber leaving just ten teams on the 2014 Formula One grid, claims a report in the German media.


According to Auto Moto und Sport, Marussia - like many of their rivals - are struggling and face a budget of "76 million euros."


The team's Russian owners are keen to merge with another team and, having failed in a bid to do so with Williams, have targeted Sauber.


Journalist Michael Schmidt claims that "chief Andrei Cheglakov is reportedly fed up with needing to dig deep into his own pockets only to be down the field but he still wants to remain in Formula 1.


"He tried to buy Mercedes motorsport boss Toto Wolff's shares at Williams, that's around 15 percent.


"Bernie Ecclestone is said to have endorsed the deal but Claire Williams rejected it as Williams want to remain independent."


The report continued claiming that Marussia have now set their sights on "joining forces" with Sauber, who are "looking for new sponsors and partners on the Russian market."



http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/9048222/-Marussia-chasing-Sauber-merge-



two less pay drivers on track.


This ^^ is what is wrong with F1. Other than the few front running teams no one is getting anywhere near enough funding to run. Sponsorship is almost non existant - take a look at the teams:
McLaren - some Mexican randomness for next year and little in the way of mid level sponsors. I would imagine they ran at a big loss this year and will be even worse next year.

Williams - Basically nothing.

Lotus - Only secondary sponsorship and how many tens of millions of losses this year?

Sauber - Again basically nothing other than what the pay drivers bring. Borderline going bust.

Force it India - Sponsors are the owners companies.

Red Bull - see above other than the Nissan money.

Ferrari - Dirty cigarette money still despite them signing agreements to do otherwise.

Marussia - enough said.

Caterham - The have GE but not sure what that is worth. Must be losing bags of cash too.

TR - shows how much coin Red Bull have to piss away.

MB - Petronas and Blackberry. Cant imagine Blackberry are long for this world. As one of two car companies with teams I dont imagine they care how much they lose. Make it up by selling sht cars with truck motors to people with too much money.

Anyway point is that the distribution of prize and tv money is so unbalanced it means teams down the blunt end have basically no chance of dragging their way out of it. All because the F1 bergers are hell bent on shoving cash Ferraris way. The whole system is nuts and reinforces boring, predictable races and results.

  • Like 1

Well he's already sold his house and lives at the factory so guess that's about as committed as one can get.

It always makes me smile when I think about how Ron Dennis started out as a mechanic at Williams.

There can really be no argument over who was the more shrewd entrepreneur in F1...

It always makes me smile when I think about how Ron Dennis started out as a mechanic at Williams.

There can really be no argument over who was the more shrewd entrepreneur in F1...

Yeah cause Frank Williams has had no success and no hurdles to overcome in his lifetime.

why's someone always gotta be contrary?

The facts- McLaren (with all it's various business activities) is now a company of far greater value under Ron's stewardship than Williams ended up being.

That's the sum total of the point I was making, sport. No need to get butt-hurt.

why's someone always gotta be contrary?

The facts- McLaren (with all it's various business activities) is now a company of far greater value under Ron's stewardship than Williams ended up being.

That's the sum total of the point I was making, sport. No need to get butt-hurt.

Well there is because running an F1 team over near on 40 years is a massive achievement. There are only a handful that ever survived for so long. Lotus didnt. Brabham, March, BRM, Ligier etc etc etc all went tits up. So the comparison is unfortunate because both Dennis and Williams have achieved massive success.

Also, a large part of the reason Honda left Williams in the mid eighties is because they didnt believe a paraplegic could run a company. Allegedly. They left to go to McLaren, by the way.

And Williams do ok on the other business activities front. Their hybrid power goes ok.

Anyway McLaren is heading downhill - I reckon 2014 will be worse than 2013. Podiums will be but a distant memory. As will sponsorship. And quick drivers. None of which is welcome. For either team.

No denying Williams F1 have had massive success, but the glory days must be a distant speck in the rear-view mirror by now. Which is a shame because I've always said I'd be Williams fan if not McLaren

Not that they've had too much to cheer about with regards to things F1 related in recent times apart from Lewis in 2008

No denying Williams F1 have had massive success, but the glory days must be a distant speck in the rear-view mirror by now. Which is a shame because I've always said I'd be Williams fan if not McLaren

Not that they've had too much to cheer about with regards to things F1 related in recent times apart from Lewis in 2008

You can be both, you know. Just as long as your hating on the team cheater Abu Dhabi is all.

Gunna get worse before it gets better for McLaren too. Hope the Honda is strong for 2015.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...