Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The maiden F1 test in a V10 car Vettel reminisced about at the AUTOSPORT Awards came in a BMW-powered Williamsin September 2005.

The outing was a reward for his utter domination of the previous year's German Formula BMW championship.

The then-18-year-old's running was delayed after Nico Rosberg - then Williams's test driver - had an engine failure in the car in the morning.

But Vettel still managed 25 laps, ending up 3.4 seconds off the pace of race driver Mark Webber.

Wouldnt it been wonderful ifWebz enjoyed that advantageat RBR

It's a bit like Dans test with RBR.

I think it is standard to fuel and set the car up to a point where it will never be competitive with the "race drivers" time. It would be pretty poor form to stick someone in and blast away a time to piss off your contracted driver. The team can garner all the results it wants with a slower car. The media, however, seem to love mentioning the times.

DJ, do a search. McLaren made quite a sizable loss last year when they had Vodafone and won GPs. I think they came 2nd in the WDC as well...and they still lost something like 20million

Had a look:

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/oct/03/mclaren-f1-team-group-loss-2012

McLaren Group made a £2.5m pre-tax loss last year (so 2012) compared with a pre-tax profit of £19.7m in 2011, according to documents filed at Companies House.

Hate to think what it would be for this year or next, come to that. And if McLaren are losing money then so must nearly everyone else.

Yeah but they've been investing massively in new parts of the business (road cars, electronics etc) plus the cost of the 2014 rule changes at a time when they've lost they're major partner in MB (whilst they've been supplying engines I doubt there's been any other support financially). So an operating loss is not to surprising and maybe Honda is gonna fill the MB Vodafone void. According to that article I wouldn't be surprised in another couple of years the road cars will be profitable enough to keep it all long term viable.

But the thing they never seem to mention is that the team is nearly 50% Middle East owned.

Yeah but they've been investing massively in new parts of the business (road cars, electronics etc) plus the cost of the 2014 rule changes at a time when they've lost they're major partner in MB (whilst they've been supplying engines I doubt there's been any other support financially). So an operating loss is not to surprising and maybe Honda is gonna fill the MB Vodafone void. According to that article I wouldn't be surprised in another couple of years the road cars will be profitable enough to keep it all long term viable.

But the thing they never seem to mention is that the team is nearly 50% Middle East owned.

The point is/was that the racing business lost £6m in 2012. A year in which they actually won races. So this year will be worse, as will next year when they have a completely different set of rules to get around and no Vodafone, no MB money and less coming in from their finish in the constructors championship.

You are right in saying that unless there is manufacturers money propping the thing up (or the owner has other companies eg Red Bull) that there isnt enough money coming in to allow the teams to properly compete. So hopefully Honda have some cash to put about.

Making road cars seldom makes money - look at Lotus as an example. Ferrari are the only ones who have managed it but then again people buy them for the name and the noise and not much else.

McLaren have been part middle east owned for decades. TAG is middle eastern and funded the Porsche motors way back when. McLAren poached them from Williams and they later became shareholders.

Anyway this year has been their shttest car since 1995.

Don't get me wrong DJ I agree it's getting so bad now the relatively successful teams are struggling, that's why I don't complain when teams like lotus take Maldonado on for money I mean people blaming lotus for the dick move but what else can they do?

I guess what I meant was I do believe mclaren cars have the potential to turn a profit and if it does it doesn't matter if the racing operation loses money.

The teams aero departments are way to powerful with to much influence over the formula. Current gen f1 cars make great time attack cars but shitty race cars. ffs the aero problem has caused shit boring races so the solution they come up with, complicate the aero by adding stally rear wings on a button yay. We need more power, mech grip>aero downforce and then drivers will become more of a commodity again with wheel to wheel racing to follow. By then Bernie will be gone too and they will bring media rights and coverage into this decade and have YouTube channels, live streams for races and all sorts of new content ideas that can actually be accessed by people outside the uk and Germany.

  • Like 1

And you know what I think is wonderful about Williams and in particular Sir Frank? He brings new sponsors into F1. He refuses to poach sponsors off other teams. The reverse cant be said when sponsors are often attracted by other F1 teams with various dealings.

Williams is a race team...McLaren did well to get newey when they did as they were in the wilderness and thankfully had tobacco money to recover from being clueless with those Pug engines etc.

Williams have had various engineering tie ups with various road car manufacturers and lower formula teams. I recall part of the reason they wiped the touring car side of the business as they said it detracted from the main focus F1. I understand their technology dept is profitable... I did read an article about McLaren and how they have gone as an F1 team when they started branching out doing other things. :) How long has it been since they have won a constructors?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...