Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So went looking for Button interview post race. Was curious to see if he was sooking about rough and ready racing or thought it was fun tough racing? Glad to see he is enjoying his last few races in a McLaren :) I almost feel sorry for him

Jenson Button: "This wasn't the result I was after - but the was good fun nonetheless. It's just a pity that we didn't quite have the race pace we'd hoped for: when you start fifth and sixth, you're not just looking for a points finish, you want a bit more than that. If we'd had a clear run, I think we could have done a bit better - but, in the traffic, it was easier for the cars around us to pick us off than it was for us to pick them off. I had an amazing battle with Checo - we took the first Lesmo side by side, which doesn't happen very often. It's a pity I couldn't get past him - I tried so many times - but he was so strong under braking that to match him into the turns I was locking up the fronts and the rears, which left me struggling for position on the exits. But I was really on the limit. It was superb wheel-to-wheel action - I hope it was great entertainment for the spectators and fantastic TV for the fans at home."

like

They did put on a good scrap for us! I bet Checo enjoyed rubbing McLaren's nose in it lol

How funny is it? Just embrace it or go to Advanced Hair. Fark knows e has more money than Warne

Proving his inner farktard is strong...cant even be a good winner. Rosberg did choke, but glad he he was upbeat when he jumped from the car. Sick of sooks! Bottas and Dan continue to show their class

Thought Homo tried pretty hard on the podium to overcome his tardism. Britney looked to be sulking when Lewis went in for a cuddle.

Dan needs to sort his Saturdays and his starts. But damn fine drive none the less.

Also I like the conspiracy theories that Rosberg deliberately threw the race away. Nice work.

Will be interesting in Singapore. Homo needs to keep winning to close the 22 point gap down - there are only 6 races left.

I thought Magnussen was hard done by. But I like the precedent. You cant jsut drive other cars off the track when they are alongside you. This "right to the racing line" is a bit of a crock when there is another car alongside you, even if they are only 1/3....the fact that they are there means you shouldnt just ruthlessly cut their lunch.

Look at the amazing, respectful racing you had with Massa, Hamiltion, Macs and FI. Dan...Bottas...all respectful of the track needs of the car the guy that they are racing. One of the best Monzas I remember.

Dan has messed up the last two quali sessions with mistakes. Hope he can get it right in Singapore where Vettel has been untouchable. Tempted to jump on a plane.

I thought the Magnussen penalty was reasonable... Bottas was in front and on the racing line into 1... Magnussen was NEVER going to make it without driving Bottas clean off the road, so fair penalty imo.

I'd be interested to see the Guittierez pass that left him with a puncture...From the quick look they showed as it happened, it looked like he was in the process of passing, then decided to squeeze whoever it was he was passing and gave himself a puncture, pretty amateur looking move...But it may have been the other car moving into him, I didn't see a replay to be sure..

and Hamilton really needs Rosberg to have some DNF's or at least bad races if he's a chance to win it... They said that if Merc finish 1-2 for the remaining races, Hamilton has to be 1st in every one to beat Rosberg, and no one really looks like spoiling the 1-2's apart from the odd good strategy/race from RBR and maybe Williams...

I thought the Magnussen penalty was reasonable... Bottas was in front and on the racing line into 1... Magnussen was NEVER going to make it without driving Bottas clean off the road, so fair penalty imo.

I'd be interested to see the Guittierez pass that left him with a puncture...From the quick look they showed as it happened, it looked like he was in the process of passing, then decided to squeeze whoever it was he was passing and gave himself a puncture, pretty amateur looking move...But it may have been the other car moving into him, I didn't see a replay to be sure..

and Hamilton really needs Rosberg to have some DNF's or at least bad races if he's a chance to win it... They said that if Merc finish 1-2 for the remaining races, Hamilton has to be 1st in every one to beat Rosberg, and no one really looks like spoiling the 1-2's apart from the odd good strategy/race from RBR and maybe Williams...

The double point stupidity makes it a mess but basically 6 races, 22 points difference and 7 points differential for a 1-2. But like you say one DNF and it all changes.

I thought the Magnussen penalty was borderline. He did kind of open the steering a bit mid corner, but it's a tight corner to start with. There has been much worse running people off the road at other tracks that haven't received penalties.

Was a great drive by Dan. Pity he started poorly and got pushed off at the first chicane.

Anyone see Adam Parr tweet? 8 teams for next year and 3rd cars in 2015.

Sauber, Marussia, Caterham, Lotus all in trouble. McLaren, Williams losing money. Though Saubers seems to have a Canadian billionaire to their rescue

Pretty bad for Williams as they are losing money this year. From GPWeek mag. For the first six months of 2014 they lost $33.4M US against an income of $60M. Ouch. Bad because they now have an actual sponsor, a pay driver and a bunch of prize money although the tv rights from 4th in the constructors should held kick in for the next 6. But if they are losing money then god help the likes of Sauber and Lotus.

Still it is Ferrari's, Redbull's etc (ie the big team but mostly those two) who hoover up all the money to the detriment of the smaller teams. Not going to be so clever when there is no one left to compete against. Basically if the business model doesn't stack up for the mid field then it is broken.

Third cars suck balls. All of the teams should bring their own designs. No dodgy Benetton/Ligier hook-ups like Tom Walkinshaw managed before he went bankrupt.

Edited by djr81

But that is the point. There should be somewhere in the midfield that a team can survive and if they are good enough, prosper. The lack of money means a lack of development which leaves them somewhere down the back of the grid and potentially going bust. Meanwhile RedBull & Ferrari hoover up all the cash which they clearly don't really need to be viable.

The last team which wasn't manufacturer or drinks company backed (So not RedBull or MB) to go from being a midfield runner to a contender was probably Jordan. And that was what, near on 20 years ago? Williams may just get back up on the plane but by god they are spending some coin to do so. Hope it pays off.

I think Sauber have earned their right to be on the grid. Very suscessful sportscar program. Encouraging results in the early year with Ilmor-Mercedes engines before they went to McLaren.

Had a tidy car in the BMW years proving that they were doing as good job pre and post BMW as the results were not overly better with rubbish BMW Motorsport muddying the waters. They are a strong "mess up and we will be there to grab a podium" team. They are missing James Allison going to STR, but they are what F1 needs.

And forget Fezz and RBR taking too much money out of the sport. How about CVC/FOM take a smaller percentage for their management of the series and give it to team and circuit owners. How about they dont rape teams by having contracts with airlines, hotels and DHL etc which dictate that teams in the series must use these series sponsors. Only for these service providers to rape teams by charging higher airline fees than joe public are charged. Higher hotel rates...I read DHL absolutely rape F1 teams for logistic costs. And all these paid premiums are no doubt kick backs to FOM for awarding the contracts in the first place.

Farking capitalism and carnts with billions that somehow need billions more. I remember when sport was sport. People lived in communities....now we all seem to live in an econmomy where everything serves the economy and need for bigger profits year on year. F1 is just a reflection of the broader business/economic paradigm that corrupts everything it farking touches.

Phew, feel a little better now for that purge.

Meanwhile Uncle Joe talking that Vettel to Ferrari frees up Alonso for Mac. I hope something changes at McLaren, Sauber too. Bin Sutil and get Frijns in the car with the new Canadian money

I think Sauber have earned their right to be on the grid. Very suscessful sportscar program. Encouraging results in the early year with Ilmor-Mercedes engines before they went to McLaren.

Had a tidy car in the BMW years proving that they were doing as good job pre and post BMW as the results were not overly better with rubbish BMW Motorsport muddying the waters. They are a strong "mess up and we will be there to grab a podium" team. They are missing James Allison going to STR, but they are what F1 needs.

And forget Fezz and RBR taking too much money out of the sport. How about CVC/FOM take a smaller percentage for their management of the series and give it to team and circuit owners. How about they dont rape teams by having contracts with airlines, hotels and DHL etc which dictate that teams in the series must use these series sponsors. Only for these service providers to rape teams by charging higher airline fees than joe public are charged. Higher hotel rates...I read DHL absolutely rape F1 teams for logistic costs. And all these paid premiums are no doubt kick backs to FOM for awarding the contracts in the first place.

Farking capitalism and carnts with billions that somehow need billions more. I remember when sport was sport. People lived in communities....now we all seem to live in an econmomy where everything serves the economy and need for bigger profits year on year. F1 is just a reflection of the broader business/economic paradigm that corrupts everything it farking touches.

Phew, feel a little better now for that purge.

Meanwhile Uncle Joe talking that Vettel to Ferrari frees up Alonso for Mac. I hope something changes at McLaren, Sauber too. Bin Sutil and get Frijns in the car with the new Canadian money

Solidarity bruvvers and sisters.

F1 is sport for the couple hours they are on track on a Sunday afternoon. The rest of the time its just business. So the big teams lock in their advantages and incomes with no thought to anyone other than themselves. Best and most unforgivable example was Ferrari negotiated themselves in the position of having the right to veto rule changes.

You are right there are too many snouts in the trough. It is madness that the circuits and the teams are the ones that are struggling most. I mean other than putting on the show what else do they do? Venture capitalists who give no fk about the sport are raking in the big coin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
    • I think the consensus was that's normal. Sloped road surfaces or something? I remember @silviaz went through this before. It might be one of those things you never notice until you pay attention to it.
    • Im not entirely sure exactly what or where its leaking from, he started to pull the boots to swap to my new tie rods + ends and it just vomited fluid, so he closed em up up, swapped the rod ends to the old rods and let me know so I can figure a solution out, im guessing its all origional as as I passed 103k miles earlier this year im sure its just in need of a full overhual/rebuild anyways.    If i could just yank it off and be good it wouldn't be an issue to ship it out and wait for the turnaround but the guy I work with doesnt really have space to keep my car for a week or two at a time, would rather drop it off and have a replacement ready to drop in
×
×
  • Create New...