Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why dont they have detection lines at flag points and cars hit rev limits that will see the cars slow and need to downshift and maintain 120km/h until then clear the flag point where the next green is shown.

Totally concur, with technology available why leave it to driver to judge lift when they know it leaves opportunity for another driver to lift less and catch them up, get them to select a flag mode. Obviously bit more complex than pit lane, possible multi flag sections require differing limits with transitions etc but they do have enough IQ & $s between them to work it out.

And Micky, put simply, you aquaplane because you exceed the rate the tyre can clear water - speed is definitely a variable

Yes hence why I said he needed wets, I think 65l per second vs about 30L for inters? Someone will correct me.

We don't know how quick he was going, the driver is considered to know the appropriate speed for the conditions. All great in hindsight.

Yes hence why I said he needed wets, I think 65l per second vs about 30L for inters? Someone will correct me.

We don't know how quick he was going, the driver is considered to know the appropriate speed for the conditions. All great in hindsight.

Inters disperse 25l per second brah

at the speed Jules went into the cul of that tractor I'd say he lost control of the car just as he went to turn and once the car slides in such conditions there is nothing a driver can can do

I feel for Jules though and his family right now.

Totally concur, with technology available why leave it to driver to judge lift when they know it leaves opportunity for another driver to lift less and catch them up, get them to select a flag mode. Obviously bit more complex than pit lane, possible multi flag sections require differing limits with transitions etc but they do have enough IQ & $s between them to work it out.

And Micky, put simply, you aquaplane because you exceed the rate the tyre can clear water - speed is definitely a variable

At the end of the day, with current technology a driver will ALWAYS be better in wet conditions. I have never seen a system like that that performs in the wet. It's always dangerous and would be worse in the wet.

Unfortunately the driver made a huge error and was going much too fast for the conditions. Such a horrible accident. But it's part of the sport, and it is bound to happen every now and then.

Don't know why they don't (some tracks do) just have cranes outside of the track that can literally pick the vehicle up and over the wall without going on the track. Make the whole recovery much faster and much safer.

Firstly I am not apportioning any blame to Bianchi in this accident...but I am wondering with technology what it is today why dont they have detection lines at flag points and cars hit rev limits that will see the cars slow and need to downshift and maintain 120km/h until then clear the flag point where the next green is shown.

Seriously the drivers tendency to speed through double waved yellows in V8 Supercars is terrible and F1 not much better. Has long frustrated me that FIA dont police it more heavily and a joke that in quali sessions drivers only need to demonstrate a lift of a tenth or two as acknowledging the yellow

Just need to deploy the safety car in the wet when the recovery vehicle is out. Double waved yellows is not enough.

looking at that gif, id be worried about the gap in the wall too, cause if truck wasnt there it almost looks like he would have missed the tyre wall and gone through the gap...

it was a horrible accident, rain fell, inters at the end of their life so prob dispersing less water, and a fast sweeping turn...

also the green flag surly shouldnt have been there

hmmmmaybe not, looks like the wall folds back, just not sure how far

Edited by MatthewT85

Sorry, i may have missed something, but why are people saying 'forza jules'?

Isn't he French? and driving for a Russian team?

Whats the relationship there?

Nando started it on twitter.

Edit for linky.

https://mobile.twitter.com/alo_oficial/status/518825831435489280

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
    • Bit of a similar question, apprently with epoxy primer you can just sand the panel to 240 grit then apply it and put body filler on top. So does that basically mean you almost never have to go to bare metal for simple dents?
    • Good to hear. Hopefully you're happy enough not to notice when driving and just enjoy yourself.
    • I mean, most of us just love cars. Doesnt necessarily have to be a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...