Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Exhaust finally fitted today and looks good from underneath . Consists of 3.5 dump to 3.5" 200 cell XForce metal cat which tapers to 3" for the cup joint and the rest of the system . They used the largest longest straight through mufflers that physically fitted - the rear one is 20" long . The outlet is a straight section of polished 3" stainless tube .

I asked for quiet and that's what I got , if anything it's a little too quiet and I didn't previously think that was possible with straight through 3" mufflers .

If you can remember what a factory std VL NA sounded like it's a little louder than that .

The old exhaust is a HKS one and available if anyone wants a cheapy . The ceramic cat is in good nick internally with its matrix very clean at the temp sensor end .

I'm interested to see if mixtures and consumption changes much , also turbo transients .

A .

Went for a quick spin down to the Burg on the Princes Hwy last night and it's easier to live with noise wise , could easily drive for long distances now .

The turbo transients are a bit better and the engine "comes alive" a bit more in the 2800 plus area . What is showing up is how sensitive it is to fuel mixtures at part throttle as it climbs onto boost , if its out it's not terrible but it loses a bit of torque just at the transition point . It's this that makes me think sometimes that MAF systems could be better than MAP sensed ones because the difference in air flow may give a bit more tuning sensitivity than a MAP sensor reading relatively slow pressure changes .

Also I'm using manifold pressure for accel enrichment ATM and may have to go back to TP , neither is perfect .

Photo wise there isn't much to see , I think the ovals are Redbacks and the rear is the largest they do in 3" from memory . You might find it a bit too quiet for your liking .

I have to see Kirawee Mufflers this morning , real easy to find . If you know where Just Jap is walk down to the roundabout and look across to the left on the other side of the road can't miss it .

A .

Went for a quick spin down to the Burg on the Princes Hwy last night and it's easier to live with noise wise , could easily drive for long distances now .

The turbo transients are a bit better and the engine "comes alive" a bit more in the 2800 plus area . What is showing up is how sensitive it is to fuel mixtures at part throttle as it climbs onto boost , if its out it's not terrible but it loses a bit of torque just at the transition point . It's this that makes me think sometimes that MAF systems could be better than MAP sensed ones because the difference in air flow may give a bit more tuning sensitivity than a MAP sensor reading relatively slow pressure changes .

Also I'm using manifold pressure for accel enrichment ATM and may have to go back to TP , neither is perfect .

Out of interest targetting AFR wise in that area? And how are you sure it's not timing that is partly to blame for the softness? There are all kinds of ways of going about the whole transient throttle tuning to get it right though, definitely where the "art" is to tuning I reckon - making good power reliably is a bare minimum.

What is left on the to do list before it hits the dyno? And are you going to have a comparison with the GT-RS?

EV14 injectors hopefully in a GTt fuel rail but spending a bit quick ATM , Lancers up for rego soon and we get bitten pretty badly for that in Sydney .

I didn't get a graph for the GTRS tune and a fair bit changed since then , everything after the AFM to behind the cat grew and what's behind that flows better and is quiet .

As predicted , ATM anyway , there is no comparison between the GTRS and the GT30 but that's not to say that the 30 is a laggy pig . Obviously taking some restrictions out of the system that weren't so obvious with the GT28 has helped overall and it would have been interesting to see how it would have been with a better exhaust .

These 3076Rs are interesting at this point because they make an RB25 a more evenly rounded package even though they don't stick much boost it till a little before 3000 revs . I understand why people see them as being progressive over the rev rage where smaller turbos snap on and get things out of shape . I suppose if you drove around with your foot buried all the time these force you to wait a bit till they get cracking , don't think you'd get away with that for too long in these parts .

My current impression is that's it's still boarder line a smidge big but not by much , if you get my meaning not really laggy but a little more shove a little lower down would be good . Don't want to open old sores but this is where a slightly lighter slightly smaller trim turbine would have paid off . The GT28 turbine was a little small where the GT30 84T is a little big and Garrett don't want to give us the lighter smaller trim 60mm NS111 turbine .

Scott hinted these injectors aren't exactly high tech but that's because I'm fussy about fuel transients at small pulse widths . Fine for most people particularly with ethanol but when you want it virtually like factory or better they fall a little short . I think why the EV14s do better is because the moving parts are shorter and lighter than earlier designs and this makes them easier to control at small pulse widths .

These 3076Rs are interesting at this point because they make an RB25 a more evenly rounded package even though they don't stick much boost it till a little before 3000 revs . I understand why people see them as being progressive over the rev rage where smaller turbos snap on and get things out of shape . I suppose if you drove around with your foot buried all the time these force you to wait a bit till they get cracking , don't think you'd get away with that for too long in these parts .

My current impression is that's it's still boarder line a smidge big but not by much , if you get my meaning not really laggy but a little more shove a little lower down would be good . Don't want to open old sores but this is where a slightly lighter slightly smaller trim turbine would have paid off . The GT28 turbine was a little small where the GT30 84T is a little big and Garrett don't want to give us the lighter smaller trim 60mm NS111 turbine .

Scott hinted these injectors aren't exactly high tech but that's because I'm fussy about fuel transients at small pulse widths . Fine for most people particularly with ethanol but when you want it virtually like factory or better they fall a little short . I think why the EV14s do better is because the moving parts are shorter and lighter than earlier designs and this makes them easier to control at small pulse widths .

Yep well familiar with the injector design stuff, including fussiness - I love the Bosch injectors.

I think you misinterpret some of the disagreements stuff we had on the turbo side of things still, but nonetheless it sounds like we are actually on more of a same page than you realise - I never said these things were magic at low low rpm, but they are also more streetable then you seemed to think they would be. I dislike the .63a/r housing for higher flow but at the same time I always thought a 0.82 would be a bit big for your liking, the likes of a 0.73 would probably be closer to the right kind of cup of tea for your tastes and would probably change the character just that little bit. What you are experiencing now will be probably close to as good as you are going to get, I hope it's liveable or proves justifiable when you get a full power tune and get to explore the full rev range and how the checks and balances land. Have you actually had it WOT with a bit of boost yet?

Wait until he does, and has first hand experience how well it works, and over how wide a range.

Previous post suggests its a slow process of expanding the rpm/load envelope but he's getting the picture... :yes:

Yep totally agree on the 0.73 housing , HKS did them in T2 flange but no IWG .

I don't hate it fellas it's just that driving in built up areas with mostly 50-70 km/h limits means getting around at sub 2800 revs much of the time .

No I don't wind this thing up much because it isn't properly tuned for the 50 50 E42 splash blend it runs , if the injectors allowed it I'd probably run straight 98 pulp because it gets better at low revs and part throttle the higher the petrol content gets . I've been down to about E25 but at real low revs and pulse widths around 1-1.5ms you lose mixture control and have to raise the idle to ~ 1000 revs . This thing should be able to idle at 650-700 on PULP and with better injectors I think it will , the ViPec tries hard but the squirters get sleepy .

Good injectors and tuning will get the best out of this turbo , hopefully best will be good enough in the rev ranges it spends most of its time .

A .

Running a auto-spec diff 4.363 ratio will claw back a large proportion of any drop in low-speed response when driving in built up areas in the higher gears. Make the car a better thing in most ways except possibly a steady 110km/h motorway cruise.

No need or desire to run the thing in 2nd gear.

I gather the standard air box and snork , with a dormant Z32 , wouldn't make any difference up to 300 wheel wasps ? Intake is Scottys 80mm with a silicon step up to 100 at the comp housing .

Will have a look at the timing map today to see where its at in the boost threshold area . Is anyone running a similar setup prepared to give some ballpark timing numbers in the 0-10 pounds boost 2500-3500 rev area ?

A .

Sure, here's mine - not the same turbo, however very similar in many ways.

1.2 bar of boost in 4th at 3800-ish rpm - timing map is for 98 RON and with knock monitoring I can't hear anything. However this is consider very mild timing as I punched these in before the track day and only have touched it up here and there.

post-22311-0-99266500-1397783575_thumb.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
    • lol nice, I wouldn't worry about sanding back the filler to check for rust then. Yep very much a thing. Personally I don't do the panel beating, its very easy to have a panel beater sort that out for you. If they aren't doing any prep work the actual panel beating generally doesn't take long at all.  Have you taken before pictures before you started this project? I'd be keen to see the before and afters when you're done.
    • Some good discussion in here, for the most part I can't really add too much to it - thought I'd add some notes to the datalog screen shot that probably aren't news to anyone but a good prop... this is assuming 25psi-ish should be the boost ceiling given the first post refers to 23psi.   To state the obvious, this issue seems super weird.  Turbo speed seems pretty lethagic to build, like the turbo isn't getting as much drive as it needs - and it doesn't help that wgdc keeps rising AFTER boost target then completely shuts duty at a point, which in theory should have the straight gate dump heaps past the turbo and funnily enough causes the huge drop off.  It seems like pretty blunt boost control tuning but I'd not call that the primary issue, so much as possibly not helping the situation. I'm curious, what does a pull look like with purely mechanical boost control?  Like purely wastegate?   There are things in this log and story that make it sound like there could be a significant restriction in the intercooler piping or something - but then it's also overshooting boost target which is NOT what you'd expect with a restriction.   I can see where people are coming from with the non-linear wastegate bypass (not that any valves are linear for this kind of thing), but it still doesn't make sense that it can't hold <20psi on a 12psi spring.    Have you, or can you try measuring pressure pre-intercooler?  Be pretty interesting to see what's happening there vs in the intake manifold - sorry if I've repeated old ground, I've kinda skimmed over but I could have missed something.  In terms of comments regarding the wg spring being closer to boost target, I haven't used a straight gate but part of the reason for having close to wg target is about fighting backpressure as well - I might be wrong, but I'd have thought that part of the point of using a butterfly valve like the straight gate does you actually don't have to resist pressure at all, on EITHER side of the gate.   It shouldn't need too much leverage to start opening, the spring being more to do with where it triggers opening as opposed to resisting boost & EMAP, though smarter people can correct me if I'm wrong there.  
×
×
  • Create New...