Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, im at the stage where i want to turn my N/A 30de to turbo. because of the high comp. im guessing 11:1 im thinking of running standard RB25 turbo on around 6-7 psi, at the moment im making 155rwkw and 250nm so im wondering if anyone has done something similar and what power they got. it will also be custom tuned but exhaust mani will be std turbo std and dump std with a straight through exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441129-rb2530de-t-conversion-help/
Share on other sites

I would put a bigger turbo than that on the motor, the stock turbo will choke that motor..

I recall you said it was built from the ground up, so why not spend a tiny bit more and go for a massive turbo and feed it some E85 :D

Yeah ive got one guy interested in the motor, if that falls through ill probably run a cheap turbo setup DIY but get a tune lower rev limit. its built to rev to 7500 easily but power drops off at 6600 so with a turbo wouldnt need it to go that far anyway.

Yeah ive got one guy interested in the motor, if that falls through ill probably run a cheap turbo setup DIY but get a tune lower rev limit. its built to rev to 7500 easily but power drops off at 6600 so with a turbo wouldnt need it to go that far anyway.

Not sure what you mean it's built to rev up to 7500rpm easily.. a stock motor does that?

I reckon get a Hypergear SS2 or even SS3 or even a G3 and feed it E85.. hello 300kW+ :D

What about an RB25 Neo head and RB30 NA pistons , smaller chamber should bring the CR up to a reasonable figure .

A .

Adrian, I hope you've read the very first post.. he's already running an estimated 11:1 static CR

What makes you think you have 11:1 compression? What does a compression test come up at?

If you want more torque get a bigger turbo than stock and run it at whatever boost makes the most power. Hypergear as above should do nicely.

with non turbo engine internals you want a bigger turbo as choking the engine's hotside with a small turbo will increase internal cylinder pressure per pound of boost.

the other thing is that high compression makes it want to ping its head off. E85 will help keep temps down and detonation at bay. Also a big turbo + less boost will help increase the lifespan of your dirty mix up of skyline/VL parts.

I'd suggest something bigger than the stock turbo, and E85. perhaps go for around 10-12 pounds on a hypergear SS2? That would make for a fast car with HEAPS more torque than you are aiming for currently

Didn't realise he'd already built it with NA RB25 pistons , why is another story . You'd think the original pistons with the Neo 25s more compact chambers is easiest as long as valves and pistons don't meet .

There are workarounds but I think fitting the right pistons is the answer .

Longer cams with more overlap would reduce effective compression to a degree .

Water injection reduces combustion temperature and pressure .

Absolute minimum exhaust restriction so it can reject the heat in its exhaust gasses most effectively .

All these things cost money and only the individual can know their financial vs convenience priorities . I'm guessing the cheapest option may be to grab another RB30E short block , hunt around for a Neo 25T head and start again . Cheap cheerfull rings and bearing rebuild whilst driving the current setup .

A .

He said he has to 25 De pistons in the 30 block. Calculating the comp is way better than a compression test.

Calculating alone won't do it - you have to measure and then calculate - easier said than done.

An 11:1 compression will soon show up as a very high number c200psi on a compression test.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...