Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, im at the stage where i want to turn my N/A 30de to turbo. because of the high comp. im guessing 11:1 im thinking of running standard RB25 turbo on around 6-7 psi, at the moment im making 155rwkw and 250nm so im wondering if anyone has done something similar and what power they got. it will also be custom tuned but exhaust mani will be std turbo std and dump std with a straight through exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441129-rb2530de-t-conversion-help/
Share on other sites

I would put a bigger turbo than that on the motor, the stock turbo will choke that motor..

I recall you said it was built from the ground up, so why not spend a tiny bit more and go for a massive turbo and feed it some E85 :D

Yeah ive got one guy interested in the motor, if that falls through ill probably run a cheap turbo setup DIY but get a tune lower rev limit. its built to rev to 7500 easily but power drops off at 6600 so with a turbo wouldnt need it to go that far anyway.

Yeah ive got one guy interested in the motor, if that falls through ill probably run a cheap turbo setup DIY but get a tune lower rev limit. its built to rev to 7500 easily but power drops off at 6600 so with a turbo wouldnt need it to go that far anyway.

Not sure what you mean it's built to rev up to 7500rpm easily.. a stock motor does that?

I reckon get a Hypergear SS2 or even SS3 or even a G3 and feed it E85.. hello 300kW+ :D

What about an RB25 Neo head and RB30 NA pistons , smaller chamber should bring the CR up to a reasonable figure .

A .

Adrian, I hope you've read the very first post.. he's already running an estimated 11:1 static CR

What makes you think you have 11:1 compression? What does a compression test come up at?

If you want more torque get a bigger turbo than stock and run it at whatever boost makes the most power. Hypergear as above should do nicely.

with non turbo engine internals you want a bigger turbo as choking the engine's hotside with a small turbo will increase internal cylinder pressure per pound of boost.

the other thing is that high compression makes it want to ping its head off. E85 will help keep temps down and detonation at bay. Also a big turbo + less boost will help increase the lifespan of your dirty mix up of skyline/VL parts.

I'd suggest something bigger than the stock turbo, and E85. perhaps go for around 10-12 pounds on a hypergear SS2? That would make for a fast car with HEAPS more torque than you are aiming for currently

Didn't realise he'd already built it with NA RB25 pistons , why is another story . You'd think the original pistons with the Neo 25s more compact chambers is easiest as long as valves and pistons don't meet .

There are workarounds but I think fitting the right pistons is the answer .

Longer cams with more overlap would reduce effective compression to a degree .

Water injection reduces combustion temperature and pressure .

Absolute minimum exhaust restriction so it can reject the heat in its exhaust gasses most effectively .

All these things cost money and only the individual can know their financial vs convenience priorities . I'm guessing the cheapest option may be to grab another RB30E short block , hunt around for a Neo 25T head and start again . Cheap cheerfull rings and bearing rebuild whilst driving the current setup .

A .

He said he has to 25 De pistons in the 30 block. Calculating the comp is way better than a compression test.

Calculating alone won't do it - you have to measure and then calculate - easier said than done.

An 11:1 compression will soon show up as a very high number c200psi on a compression test.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...