Jump to content
SAU Community

Ford Xr8 Or Holden Ss Hwy Patrol


Recommended Posts

Well I'm not sure which is more intimidating brah but I've done a 60kph roll on with both and I fkn annihilated them both, the ford was closer but really I smashed em both.

My weapon of choice, TDi Passat wagon, its chipped n shit n gows hard.

I had to back off but at around 180 for some traffic lights n shit.

Gr8 b8 m8, would have had me except for the fact that it's well known that phagmobiles can't keep up with any LS master race powered cars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well look Ben get your facts straight, it states;

"For disussion relating to all other cars, bikes and other powered vehicles"

No wonder the quality of the Skyline Forum is declining rapidly cause of these dimwits.

I see your HUGE contribution of oh, 12 posts makes you a forum whizz. Its a shame people like you add to the decline of QUALITY topics to discuss. Who gives a s#%t which cop car looks better?

While on the subject of facts: The busies have used FPV F6's for over five years now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:unsure: This is all getting a bit intense...

On another note, it would be awesome if NSW HWP practiced what they did in the USA Nevada and modified than ran their older HWP cars on the drag strip on nights called "Beat the Heat".

It would be a good feeling to smash a copper on the QTR Mile....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had a wrx Sti at one point that they used at wsid for that exact reason, but it didn't last long

Just like the WRX's they ran on the road for HWP around 10 years ago... but the officers were not used to AWD compared to RWD when it came to "spirited driving" and wrote something like 5/6 of them off....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zebra, not sure if your old enough to remember this but, in the mid '90's the AFP were deciding whether to get 2 WRX or an 850 (I won't mention what shape they remind me of) T5. They chose the latter, & during a pursuit, put it through a brick wall at the bega flats chasing a WRX! Ironic?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
    • You have your numbers back to front. 350mm from wheel centre to guard lip would be scrapinly low and the suspension arms would be at spastic angles and it would have the road manners of a meth affected giraffe. You can down to ~450mm (from larger stock starting values about 50ish mm higher than that) before you start to create to many problems.
×
×
  • Create New...