Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nismo 740s are 16600-RR544

Looks like you might have "Jecs" injectors which are OEM or copied Jecs injectors remanufactured to different flow rates.

These have a poor reputation so will be interesting to see how they bear up in testing (and in tuning).

score! don't forget to get the lag times....you'll need them when for when you tune.....I'd advise you to put them straight in after the cleaning and flowing as mine got stuck after not putting them in after a full bench flow and test and multiple ultrasonic baths...I only waited 2 months.

Nismo 740s are 16600-RR544

Looks like you might have "Jecs" injectors which are OEM or copied Jecs injectors remanufactured to different flow rates.

These have a poor reputation so will be interesting to see how they bear up in testing (and in tuning).

I'm running some of those remanufactured 850s from tlf performance. it goes on the dyno tomorrow....hoping for the best.

You just can't explain it to some people Ben, the extra time required to set the idle on the dyno, mucking around with lag times to get them feeling good, the hassle is, there is no way to know if they are all similar.

Remanufactured means some company took your stock injectors, ran a drill through them, cleaned them then sold them back for more than a new set of Xspurts would cost. I just don't get it...

You just can't explain it to some people Ben, the extra time required to set the idle on the dyno, mucking around with lag times to get them feeling good, the hassle is, there is no way to know if they are all similar.

Remanufactured means some company took your stock injectors, ran a drill through them, cleaned them then sold them back for more than a new set of Xspurts would cost. I just don't get it...

they idle fine if you get your lag time right in your corrections....thats why its important to know.....and i get about 400+km to a tank. i'm pretty pleased i didn't piss $1000 up against the wall when there are injectors out there that will do the job for a third the price.

Badgaz, a shit spray pattern is still a shit pattern. And compared to modern injectors the pattern of drilled injectors is terrible.

Maybe you get away with it for around 700cc or less but bigger than that idle is way harder to get nice, and economy will suffer. If you compared to decent injectors you would realise straight away.

You do however get an acceptable result with drilled injectors if you don't know any better though. They will make same power on a dyno and that seems to be the only thing people care about.

they idle fine if you get your lag time right in your corrections....thats why its important to know.....and i get about 400+km to a tank. i'm pretty pleased i didn't piss $1000 up against the wall when there are injectors out there that will do the job for a third the price.

A good tuner doesn't need lag time guesses from the manufacturer, they work it out initially during the first part of the tune. The problem comes when there are differences between each injector's lag time, as there is no way the tuner can compensate or even know.

If you are paying 1k for injectors you are getting ripped. I can sell Xspurt 1000's for $600. Top feed rails are $100 from Goodies direct... The Nismo's are closer to that 1k price, only due to the name.

A good tuner doesn't need lag time guesses from the manufacturer, they work it out initially during the first part of the tune. The problem comes when there are differences between each injector's lag time, as there is no way the tuner can compensate or even know.

If you are paying 1k for injectors you are getting ripped. I can sell Xspurt 1000's for $600. Top feed rails are $100 from Goodies direct... The Nismo's are closer to that 1k price, only due to the name.

yes agreed there is the theoretical world and the real world...my lag values had a correction of 0.29 at 14volts from the manufacturer....it idled a little crappy and i adjusted the correction to 0.31 and it idles perfect....just like they were suppose to be 850's but i'm working off a correction factor that is 52% which puts them around 750cc. 1k is what we'd pay over here in NZ for a set of 740's.

yes agreed there is the theoretical world and the real world...my lag values had a correction of 0.29 at 14volts from the manufacturer....it idled a little crappy and i adjusted the correction to 0.31 and it idles perfect....just like they were suppose to be 850's but i'm working off a correction factor that is 52% which puts them around 750cc. 1k is what we'd pay over here in NZ for a set of 740's.

You can get IDs for less but I'll just get my next set of injectors off Scotty.

Just to close this thread out, picked them up today. They have been drilled/flowed what ever they are!! Flow ended up being 800, well 790mil. So enough for what i need. Pritty happy to be honest. The guy that gave them a service replaced all the O rings etc and said the spray pattern was spot on

Fair enough, spot on was my wording. He said they had a good consistent spray pattern. Translate that into injector service technician speak and you have the correct wording

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...