Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.deatschwerks.com/products/fuel-injectors/sport-compact/nissan/skyline/rb26dett-skyline/1989-2002-rb26dett

Pick your poison! Direct easy drop ins that idle perfectly and no issues with E85, I would be going the 1200cc as there is no downside apart from the small price increase

Shipping is usually less than a week from the USA

Yeah was going to say, the ones you have now should be fine

Unless its a GTR and you are running twin GT-SS turbos?

But I ran a GT2835 HKS turbo with 555cc injectors, plenty of room left in them

Yes it is a R34 GTR so its twin HKS GT-SS

Here is the details on the build project http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/443066-finally-a-gtr-r34-owner/

On 98RON your current ones will do just fine.

Yes it is 98RON

But now I see the injector cycle on the MFD is at 100% on full boost
Edited by etang789

Works fine, no need for aftermarket. Looks better too

understood.

I was also thinking to switch back to stock fuel rail as well, is the upgraded HKS fuel rail necessary? I have no clue since this is how it is when I bought the car

The injectors you have in the car should be more than enough for the power those turbo's can produce.

I'd say who ever tuned the car has set the injectors to 100% at WOT.

When you have your foot down does a big puff of black smoke come out and it smells fuelly?

The injectors you have in the car should be more than enough for the power those turbo's can produce.

I'd say who ever tuned the car has set the injectors to 100% at WOT.

When you have your foot down does a big puff of black smoke come out and it smells fuelly?

Totally agree.

Stock 440cc GTR injectors will do 300rwkw without even a rail pressure increase. If 555cc injectors can't do 340rwkw which is all GT-SSs will make... then there is something wrong.

If you need a bit of headroom, just add an extra 3-4psi to base fuel pressure, that alone will be enough once up on boost to give the fuel supply needed.

Definitely a waste of money changing ANY parts from what is currently fitted - they will do the job.

The injectors you have in the car should be more than enough for the power those turbo's can produce.

I'd say who ever tuned the car has set the injectors to 100% at WOT.

When you have your foot down does a big puff of black smoke come out and it smells fuelly?

it smells fuelly for sure and my rear bumper is black, well I dont have a cat thou...

Totally agree.

Stock 440cc GTR injectors will do 300rwkw without even a rail pressure increase. If 555cc injectors can't do 340rwkw which is all GT-SSs will make... then there is something wrong.

If you need a bit of headroom, just add an extra 3-4psi to base fuel pressure, that alone will be enough once up on boost to give the fuel supply needed.

Definitely a waste of money changing ANY parts from what is currently fitted - they will do the job.

Thanks for the advice. I guess I will just have it retuned for now... just need someone that is willing to do remote tune for me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...