Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, you'd want to go with a brand new actuator, rather than something secondhand. You've probably all seen the pain and anguish that SR20 owners go through when their VTC actuators shit themselves. Nothing available 2nd hand because they fail so often, and new price ex-Japan + 3 week wait is not pleasant either.

You could possibly do something with a $2k budget and a new actuator included. You'd not be able to do it without a capable ECU though. So that would add cost for some people and stop others from doing it at all.

As long as the actuator is robust, such as the Neo one, I can't see why a second hand assembly can't be used. You don't see Neo's smashing valve gear...

The VCT window can be actuated by many products on the market can't it? Not a big task anyway.

Making sure you have the valve clearance would be the big stress.

As long as the actuator is robust, such as the Neo one, I can't see why a second hand assembly can't be used. You don't see Neo's smashing valve gear...

The VCT window can be actuated by many products on the market can't it? Not a big task anyway.

Making sure you have the valve clearance would be the big stress.

I thought all the talk was about using VQ style actuators to gain the full VCAM experience. If not, then using RB issue stuff would probably be OK. But then I would just save the pain and use a Neo head.

Someone needs to do the unmentionable and put a neo head on an rb26.

Higher comp and vct with e85 would be awesome.

There had been mention the neo head can suffer shim spitting at high revs but that can be sorted cheaper than fitting vct to a 26 head surely?

a switched set up wouldn't be hard, RB VCT solenoid and inlet actuator, tee the oil pressure sensor for oil feed, rpm activated switch. Hardest part would be blocking the oil feed for the front cam journal and routing and drilling for the solenoid in its place. You would want a TIG on hand just in case you drill in the wrong spot!

continual variable would be a challenge, since you need to add cam position sensors, a better solenoid (PWM), actuator and an ecu that not only has target cam position, but that can actually control it and do so within 10ths of a second

continual variable would be a challenge, since you need to add cam position sensors, a better solenoid (PWM), actuator and an ecu that not only has target cam position, but that can actually control it and do so within 10ths of a second

It's been done with a Haltech already, I am sure most high end ecu's could easily manage it. You would want a good tuner though.

Someone needs to do the unmentionable and put a neo head on an rb26.

done, Racepace, many moons ago. No E85 at the time though.

I have my HKS Vcam controlled by my Link, so no HKS electronics, it's a bit of a mongrel (like me! lol) but it's a sweet setup. There is a hall sensor to detect cam position.

I basically gave a bunch of parts to Trent and said "fix it fix it fix it!" :D

Ah, it was yours I was thinking of Daniel, I thought you had a Haltech for some reason.

I seem to remember Trent being worried about valve clearance, do you know what degree advance/retard you ended up getting out of it?

yes, obviously a lot of care was taken with that as Vcam was added post build.

I have the type a, step 1 or whatever the first 'stage' Vcam is as my pistons are supposedly N1's, so effective stock size (?), meaning advanced/retard options aren't maxed out to what the other Vcam options can do

Someone needs to do the unmentionable and put a neo head on an rb26.

Higher comp and vct with e85 would be awesome.

There had been mention the neo head can suffer shim spitting at high revs but that can be sorted cheaper than fitting vct to a 26 head surely?

There are at least two motors getting around that have had it done... and that was over 2 years ago now. So likely there are quite a few more now that have gone down this road.

From memory the hardest part is an adaptor to get the RB26 intake into the NEO.

So yeah, definitely not unmentionable or uncharted territory :D

There are at least two motors getting around that have had it done... and that was over 2 years ago now. So likely there are quite a few more now that have gone down this road.

From memory the hardest part is an adaptor to get the RB26 intake into the NEO.

So yeah, definitely not unmentionable or uncharted territory :D

Cool.

As usual someone has always done whatever is thought of!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...