Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been looking at pics of R33 and R34 RB25 DET manifolds and I'm curious to know if the R34 GTt lower manifold can be substituted for the R33 one .

Main reason is to fit the GTts top feed fuel rail and retain all the R33s plenum (plumbing and IAC valve) .

If the gasket that fits between the upper and lower manifold halves is the same it may work .

Fingers crossed cheers Adrian .

That's only because the IACV is a different shape, which bolts on to the top half of the manifold anyway.

Disco I reckon that they would be the same, if not very very similar. Cannot say for sure if they would be interchangeable though.

I haven't fitted a Neo rail to a 33 so I don't know how far out the rail bolts are, but I think it would be fairly easy to fit, seeing the aftermarket rails have room. The lower spacers are only available in kits, but they are so easy to make on a lathe. The spacing for the rail bolts should be easy enough to fix. If a conversion kit was made it wouldn't cost too much in bulk...

The early WRX owners have similar issues converting from side feed to top, but a few companies have worked it out and now they sell similar conversion kits to what you RB guys need.

It really isn't hard to fit aftermarket rail as Arts did, and i did with 1000cc xspurts, just some stuffing around but very doable. Just paint it black for stealth look.

Not impossible to get the Neo rail on but probably more stuffing around than its worth .

If you look at the R33 RB25 lower manifold the side feed rail mounts at three points sort of below the rail . The GTt one mounts above the rail on the cast in water passage . The 33 manifold has similar mounting points for something else but they are closer together than the GTTs ones .

You could weld mounting pads to the lower manifold if it was off but most don't feel like removing it and it becomes a unique part .

If keen you could cut and weld different mounts on the GTT fuel rail but it's cad plated and could peel off inside and leave bare steel which isn't flash .

EFI Hardware advertises an adapter system that screws into the front of aftermarket rails to take the Nissan style rail mount reg so if it fits ARTs rail that makes life very easy . I think the rail has to have "machined O ring port" threaded sections back and front for this adapter to fit but I don't know enough about aftermarket rails to know if they are all like this .

I can lay my hands on a Nismo adjustable FPR and I'd like to know if their bypass port is any larger than the standard one .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Yep. I saw that. I agree a black rail isn't too obvious and it's not that expensive, but the amount of those crappy fiveO injectors being sold shows how keen people are to keep the stock sidefeeds, no matter the consequences. I would love to be able to supply some easy way to swap over to top feeds for those guys that want a stealth upgrade. I like stealth options.

Yep I tend to think an aluminium rail in natural finish or matt/flat black would be alright provided the fittings aren't some silly nail polish colour .

It seems the -8AN (3/4 x16) parallel thread is a defacto standard and seals with an O ring on a bevel in the ends of most aftermarket rails .

I reckon if the EFI Hardware adapter parked a standard or equivalent reg on the front of a plain rail it shouldn't attract too much attention and at least put the return line where it's supposed to be .

A .

So have you given up with the Neo rail Disco? Send it down so I can do a fit up on a 33, I might be able to work something out, anyone in Melbourne got a spare lower plenum?

Why not just put top feed rail and short injectors in your r33 intake? Just have to llose

... that's what I'm running in my drift pig? r33rb25det, aeroflow rail, ev14 1000's.

J.

He wants the stock look as much as possible, stock reg at the least.

The Aeroflow rails are set up for mid (3/4) length injectors, using the short ones requires shortening the spacers which scares some people.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...