Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone :)

I've built a new Rb26 motor for my 34GTR, now the stocky one I yanked out is being eyed off by my younger bro who has a Gtt..

Before I help him with it transplanting it in, is it as simple as going / calling vic roads about the swap so they can put it on file or will I need an engineers cert? (Melbourne)

was told by a mate shouldn't be a problem and a cert wasn't needed along as the engine was an option in the range, but I just want to make sure :)

Cheers :action-smiley-069:

Yeah in NSW I remember reading something about changing displacement by a certain percentage is okay. But after calculating whatever that percentage was, an RB30 is not suitable for a car that comes with an RB25 but the RB26 is all G

meh, most people don't bother because no policeman/woman will read the engine number when they pull you over

Anyone who would consider swapping a 26 in place of a Neo 25 is not using their brain anyway.

Neo 25 is the superior choice of the two, straight up

Rb26 isn't really much of a street engine hey. VCT is awesome

by stocky I mean fully built engine making 490rwkw and FOC to him.. that's why he's keen.. :whistling:

iv'e gone a different single turbo path with the new 3lt motor.

not interested in what's better what else has to be done etc I was just wondering If anyone has swapped a 26 into a gtt / gt and been able to have it on the vicroads database with no certificate..thats all.. :yes:

not interested in what's better what else has to be done etc I was just wondering If anyone has swapped a 26 into a gtt / gt and been able to have it on the vicroads database with no certificate..thats all.. :yes:

Victoria = fully engineered for that conversion. Hell, in SA I had to put my car across the full Regency inspection routine and upgrade the brakes (and make sure every single aspect of the car was 100% legal) in order to get an RB25 transplant legal. Victoria are a pack of arseholes by comparison. You can only have 2 intake system mods without needing full engineering. How many such mods are involved in swapping in an RB26?

Edited by GTSBoy

In vic, you need to make a claim that the engine was offered in that model car.

The query really is that "model" = r34 Skyline, or is the "model" a GTR?

That's the point of contention.

For example, I had a N/A R34 GT. I put a RB25DET Neo into it, and some 33 GTST brakes.

I went to vicroads. I spoke to them and said "I have put this turbo engine into my car"

They checked the rego number. They looked at the brakes for about one millionth of a second and then updated the engine number.

That was it. No engineering cert required, no follow ups, no cost, nothing. In and out in 15 minutes.

I could conceive (having done it before!) that you could go there with a R34 coupe and say "this is a RB26, it came in this chassis" which it pretty much did.

Show some 324mm brakes (they wont measure, 310 is enough I'd wager) and they will probably just update the engine number and away you go. You can engineer almost any swap.

If someone gave me a 490KW forged RB26, I would be doing exactly what you're doing as you can make it EPA proof and Legally put it into a R34 GTT.

If you were starting from a base RB26 vs a RB25 neo, I wouldn't go that route - but that also isn't what you're doing.

I went to the one in Burwood, as I was working at HP at the time, which is literally directly across the road.

The law says you don't need an engineer certificate to put an engine in that was an option for that chassis.

But shit, even if you do need an engineer certificate and they knock you back? I'd just try and get one anyway, because that's going to be cheaper than buying a forged RB26 when you think about it.

Though if I was going to do that, I'd like to engineer a forged XR6T engine, because that'd be legal but a RB26/30 isn't, because GO VICTORIA!

  • Like 1

It didn't come in that chassis. If you get it "approved" by just lying to them to the effect that it "came in that chassis" and the dumb flamin mongrel behind teh counter just does it for you, it doesn't make it legal. That comes under the category of a clerical error and leaves you with no protection at all. You're hanging out to dry as far as 3rd party liability goes (ie, no insurance on an illegally modified/registered vehicle), plus your comprehensive insurance, should you have it, will have an opportunity to shaft you if you like.

There is only one way to get this stuff done properly, and that is properly. Anything that requires relying on counter staff ignorance might make you feel warm and fuzzy when you get the wool pulled over their eyes, but you better hope that nothing bad happens thereafter.

Edited by GTSBoy

It didn't come in that chassis. If you get it "approved" by just lying to them to the effect that it "came in that chassis" and the dumb flamin mongrel behind teh counter just does it for you, it doesn't make it legal. That comes under the category of a clerical error and leaves you with no protection at all. You're hanging out to dry as far as 3rd party liability goes (ie, no insurance on an illegally modified/registered vehicle), plus your comprehensive insurance, should you have it, will have an opportunity to shaft you if you like.

There is only one way to get this stuff done properly, and that is properly. Anything that requires relying on counter staff ignorance might make you feel warm and fuzzy when you get the wool pulled over their eyes, but you better hope that nothing bad happens thereafter.

Is it though?

I get what you're saying, and the 'best' option is to get it engineered, no questions asked, and for the cost, I'd probably do that anyway.

But you can put a V8 into a V6 commodore.

You can put a RB25DET Neo into a non turbo R34 (with brakes)

But there's a lot different between a GT and a GTT in my example. Different gearbox. Different steering, different suspension, different diff, different every other component in the car as I found out later. The only thing similar in the end (or exactly the same) is the chassis the panels sit on.

Is that not the same scenario for the GTR vs the GTT?

It's an interesting Ship of Thesus style thought experiment, really.

In the end, to be fully certain, I'd ask an Engineer, armed with the definition of what is required for a Legal engine swap in Victoria.

The exact wording is:

"Fitting a manufacturer's optional engine together with any associated components (e.g. brakes, suspension, etc) as supplied by the manufacturer for that same model vehicle"

Is 'model' = R34? or is 'model' = GT-R?

Keeping mind they also state you can put a XR8 engine into a XR6, the model would seem to be 'Ford Falcon' in that case.

In the end, I'd get an engineer's word before I even touched a wrench to move the engine, and have a certificate before you try and explain these definitions on the side of the road if someone wants to hand you a defect for it.

Yes it is different.

For one thing, V6 and V8 Dunnydores have the same chassis. The same model code.

NA and turbo Skylines have the same chassis. The differences are just window dressing and can be bolted on and off. The GTRs are considered (by the authorities) to be a completely different model code. And you cannot turn a GT into a GTR or vice versa by swapping parts.

So whilst we all know that the R32 or R33 or R34 part is technically the chassis identifier and therefore you could make an argument that a GTR and a normal Skyline only differ in the specifications, both we and the authorities know that the cars are sufficiently different that they treat them as if they are completely unrelated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It is a kunfine Android screen . Does anyone know the wirering diagram of the fuga ??
    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
×
×
  • Create New...