Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sup eeeeeeeevvvvvvveryy body
im a little bored and im after a little more response ! im currently running a gt3037s .84 rear housing and external gate on a stock r34 manifold. its making a tad over 300kw on e85.
i was thinking of changing the rear housing to a twin scroll housing ? don't know if its worth changing it to a .84 or a 1.06 twin scroll housing ?
or should i just buy another turbo :/

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446334-3037-with-twin-scroll-housing/
Share on other sites

If you changed to twin scroll it would do these 3 things:

- Make boost a little earlier

- Not push you as hard in the seat when it does

- Cost a lot of money to do

My recommendation:

Replace the 3037 cartridge kit with a GTX3071 and keep your .84 EWG setup. Known winning formula.

Case closed!

  • Like 1

Leave it well enough alone the GTX3071 is not an upgrade IMO.

The cost of changing to TS is just not worth the effort.

Agreed, to do TS properly costs way too much.

This is pretty much what I did, changing the GTX3076 for the GTX3071, it was night and day for response, with very little loss in my case. If you can get a good price for the 3037 I would say go for it.

Do you want more power? Otherwise drop a GTX28 on there and run ethanol. Response and power. ;)

  • Like 1

Leave it well enough alone the GTX3071 is not an upgrade IMO.

The cost of changing to TS is just not worth the effort.

I've only been in 2 GTX3071 powered cars, though have experienced a myriad of GT3076 and can say the GTXs definitely have the upper hand.

To the point, OP is asking about doing a twin scroll upgrade to get a little more response. Dollar for dollar I am more than confident that the swap to the GTX will get him the little extra zing he's after without the flatter feel.

Whether or not it is really a worthwhile change is as subjective and dependent on personal preference as can be, but I think the comment serves to answer the question.

GTX3071 is more of a sideways step IMO.

Slot a Forced Performance FP3076 into your existing exhaust housing....GeeTeeTee has proven back to back better response and power over his GT3076. Might be what you are looking for minimal changes and for minimal cost.

Link:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/

If you have your heart set on a twin-scroll setup (and prepared to spend the dollars) then I'd be looking to the Borg Warner EFR series of turbo's as these can be had in external or internal gate twin scroll form. Internal gate would save a lot of fabrication work.

FWIW here's an early graph of my 3071 TS .78 (s15) during tuning overlayed onto a tradition single scroll 3071 setup (on a different s15) which shows the more linear nature of a twin scroll setup which may go to some way as to why some may say they don't hit as hard compared to a single scroll setup.

Dyno2.jpg

Edited by juggernaut1

sup eeeeeeeevvvvvvveryy body

im a little bored and im after a little more response ! im currently running a gt3037s .84 rear housing and external gate on a stock r34 manifold. its making a tad over 300kw on e85.

i was thinking of changing the rear housing to a twin scroll housing ? don't know if its worth changing it to a .84 or a 1.06 twin scroll housing ?

or should i just buy another turbo :/

cheers

a tad over 300kw on E85? you must be running about 14psi or the tune needs more timing put in, that shouldn't be too boring at all, maybe it just needs another tune with more boost and

using a EBC to awaken the turbo more.

maybe it just needs another tune with more boost and

using a EBC to awaken the turbo more.

+1

A good EBC makes a world of difference. Going from gate pressure to now running an EBoost Street40 has made a remarkable difference to my car.

Refer post 140 showing a GT3076 with twin scroll .82 ex hsg on an RB....once again note the linear nature of the curve.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/269782-twin-scroll-vs-single/page-7

Edited by juggernaut1

so what i gather is
its a waste of money going a twin scroll housing with a gt3037 on a standard manifold.
ill see more benefits if i go : FP3076
GTX3071
hypergear
do i sell my rear housing or do all above turbo cartridges suit ?
any other opinions oradvice ?

What you actually want is not clear other than "a little more response".

Bigger hp number? Stick more boost into it and tune.

Different torque delivery on boost, or spool characteristics? The FP turbo appears to be a good thing, retaining existing manifold/gate/piping. Split pulse might have the upper hand in lower/middle range rpm but you're into new manifolding, gate(s) and piping. Cost consideration.

More off boost torque and earlier transition into boost? There's no substitute for cubic inches.

so what i gather is

its a waste of money going a twin scroll housing with a gt3037 on a standard manifold.

ill see more benefits if i go : FP3076

GTX3071

hypergear

do i sell my rear housing or do all above turbo cartridges suit ?

any other opinions oradvice ?

If it were me, id take the turbo off and send it to Forced Performance for a 73mm comp wheel modification, cheaper and more effective result than Twin scroll and less work too.

Then you can join the HTA thread and brag about how good it is lol...

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=FP&Category_Code=Turbo-Upgrade

Edited by AngryRB
  • Like 1

A few observations;

You want to retain standard manifold, have more response and hit 350kw. Cannot be done. Pick 2 of the 3 only.

Just to reaffirm my position.. Going to the twin scroll will make it the opposite of the 'more aggressive' that you are asking for.

Here are your two options based on the requests you are currently making:

1. Run E85 and max out the 3037 as is to get as close to 350kw as possible.

2. Swap to a GTX3071 core and run E85 to get probably 20kw less than the 3037 but a reasonable amount more response and possibly a little more punch.

  • Like 1

Subjective is it with any GT30 based turbo on a std manifold RB25 . Not quite sure what a 0.84 turbine housing is , typo 0.82 ?

My experience with the 52T version is that drive round power is very adequate but tuning even on E85 is critical in the rev/load ranges used every day . If the fueling timing spark is a bit how ya goin then it will feel lazy and it isn't necessarily the turbo causing it .

My take with the 0.82 GT30 hot side is that you can tune it to run better than with std or GT28 based turbos because the engine breathes out better and you can take advantage of that if you or your tuner tries . And this is with little or no boost .

I think it's a fact of life that you aren't going to get 10 pounds of boost at 2000 revs with one of these (first three gears anyway real world) and you wouldn't like it if could . But if you have an RB25 in good condition even a mechanically standard one it can be more than adequate on the street . The more I think about it many of their physical characteristics are the reason why they don't pull like a Patrol at 2000 revs and if you want all that's available small turbos aren't the way to go about it . The issue is can you make enough part throttle torque for your liking and can you accept that it won't pull like a locomotive till somewhere in the mid 3000s . If you want it all you have to have good tuning and absolutely the most accurate fueling injector wise you can get because I think it does affect the part throttle lowish torque .

I wouldn't have a 34 Neo Turbo without EV14s unless it was stock as a rock . To run E85 to 300 you obviously have different injectors and pump and they won't be small . Big injectors often struggle to spray well at low pulse widths and if yours is a dribbling mess like mine possibly is then the basic engine won't give its best at light loads and the pre spool area . Basically to me its how well you can get your engine to run up to the point where the turbo boosts and FI takes off .

A .

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd be very surprised if you can buy new OEM mats. But if you can, I want some too!  Do you have links to the variations you found? Also, where are you located? I found that Nengun is happy to list items to purchase but when you do buy them you'll get an email that it's actually discontinued. As far as I know the variations in floor mats are different colour schemes as well as automatic and manual having a slightly different shape. The automatic ones fit into a manual car without issues, but I think you'd have trouble fitting the other way around. I have photos that show the shape difference if you care. FWIW I bought sets of used floor mats in decent condition at yahoo auctions.
    • Hi 🙋‍♂️. Just bought my Unicorn but the interior need some minor work so it would match my expectations ;). I noticed it is hard to get used oem floor mats in good condition so i started to dig if there's any chance to buy set of new ones. I found two websites - nengun and amayama and it looks like one can still buy factory new floor mats in Japan, but thers a small issue. Some mats (i assume genuine, oem ones) are marked as G4900 and these are "discontinued". The ones you can buy are marked as G4911 but i have no idea if these are also oem, made by other producer or some lower quality replacements that looks entirely different. Can anyone help? 😃  P.s. there is also some strange indication - 0V005, 0V015 and 0V505. Any idea what does it mean? Would appreciate any help with this 🙏
    • Hi, Marek here 🙋‍♂️. I finally fulfilled my longtime dream - recently bought Stagea and now waiting for it to arrive in Poland. There's only few of these in my country, and one of the owners  recommended mi this forum as a source of all the info i'd need since now i own one  so here i am.  
    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
×
×
  • Create New...