Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my genuine Nissan idler bearing bolt and this is the first thing I see.

The runout of the last thread looks pretty nasty, lots of grooves (stress risers).

Has anyone else got a new idler bearing bolt to see if it is like mine?

Maybe post up a picture?

post-8140-0-86093900-1407136010_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446413-rb-idler-bearing-bolt/
Share on other sites

It's not a bolt that needs to be super tight so will not be a problem at all.

If it was a torque to yield bolt you might be concerned but not for an idler bolt that is only tight not stetched.

  • Like 1

Can't believe there was a thread made for this.......

You dont use the last thread

There is only about 20ish Nm of torque on the nut

I've seen worse, People re-use these without problems

Honestly. If it is worrying you that much, Just buy another one, They arent expensive

  • Like 1

Can't believe there was a thread made for this.......

You dont use the last thread

There is only about 20ish Nm of torque on the nut

I've seen worse, People re-use these without problems

Honestly. If it is worrying you that much, Just buy another one, They arent expensive

I know what is wrong with the bolt, I was curious if other people had noticed the same thing.

Just because you don't use that section of the thread doesn't mean its not doing anything. Its actually doing alot more than the threads that are engaged.

Torque for that bolt is 43 - 58Nm and it is in single shear.

I am buying another one.

Some suggested reading material.

http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/youssefi/me154/notes/Bolt%20failure.pdf

http://arp-bolts.mobi/p/tech.php?page=2

Remember that the stud/nut are clamping the stationary part of the bearing

My comment about the nut not using that part of the thread was more about - your not going to make the thread any worse, then say if you ran a nut over it and damaged either the thread on the nut or stud. I'm fully aware of how forces are applied on bolts/studs

I was only saying, I can't see a major fault with the thread from the photo, maybe its the way the flash has gone off but it doesnt look that bad at all to me. And there is always chances of minor defects in a manufacturing process. And for the sake of a $2 part.......

As for your reading material, don't assume people are clueless when you dont know what they do for a living.

  • Like 1

Quite a long time back there was a spate of engine failures due to breaking of the idler bolt.

I spoke with Gary Cook regarding better quality bolts as the stocker isn't anything out of the box.

Gary had bought a selection of Nissan studs and the quality control was appalling.

Plenty of Unbrako quality to choose from but they don't fit under the cover, head is a bit too long.

Then almost overnight, no more breakages of the stock stud.

So were owners over tightening the stud or perhaps the belt, or did Nissan improve their quality control??????

The cross section there looks to be a fair bit bigger than in the next valley where the thread is fully formed, and those scratch marks dont appear to deep. So it doesn't look too scary to me, but i've never looked that closely before. :unsure:

My method of installing bolts.

Does this bolt fit? > Yes > put it in and tighten it to FT spec

> No > don't use it

Do I have another one that fits? > Yes > Use that one then

> No > ......where did I put my tap and die kit....

Edited by iruvyouskyrine

I am buying another one.

It's your bolt. If you don't like it and don't want to use it get another one.

Think you may have skipped a post there.

I am just curious to see what other peoples thoughts are.

It turns out it's to hard to show fine detail in a picture and very few people actually understand how surface finish can affect the life of something is under stress, so hopefully this thread can educate some people.

Here is another excellent article, scroll down to Surface Roughness

http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fatigue/fatigue_factor.cfm

I believe you are over thinking the whole thing. I would use it unless the picture doesn't show some horrible defect.

It looks pretty standard like marks from the machines used to roll or cut the thread

Edited by 89CAL

The threads are rolled, very poorly I might add. The finish indicates worn forming tools. I can say this due to experience in manufacturing head studs.

So, back to my original question.

Has anyone else got a new idler bearing bolt to see if it is like mine?
Could you please post up a close up picture?

I'm not interested in anyone's opinion, that's not what I am asking for. I am asking for a picture of the threads.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...