Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Quick run down, rb26/30 built engine running e85. Currently running rb25det ARP head studs (202-4301). Recently made 624hp@all 4 at 26psi, but then started pushing coolant on the dyno.

Engine is running a factory nissan rb26 head gasket with rb25det ARP 202-4301 head studs. Now I am going to attempt to re-torque the head down before I pull it off again to go a MLS gasket. Currently the ARP rb25 (202-4301) recommended 108nm or 80ft/lbs of torque. The rb26dett ARP head bolts recommended 105ft/lbs.

Realistically I should have re-drilled the block and gone 26 ARP head studs with a MLS gasket, but I did the wrong thing and shortcut it which I admit.

What do people think of going 90ft/lbs on the 25 studs? Or should I just go to the recommended 80? I don't know if it's the gasket itself or just lifting the head, I also don't know if I can go a little more torque on the head studs then the recommended or if that's too dangerous to attempt.

Any help would be great.

Cheers.

With lube on the thread you will get higher thread pressures than if it was dry, thread paste (loctite silver grade) will give much higher clamping pressure then oil @ the same torque settings.

should have gone MLS head gasket before you put it together. the factory head gasket can only handle so much

Royce is running 760 hp through an unopened neo with arp studs (swapped with head still on, 2nd last page of rb25 dyno results)

Maybe PM him for advice?

  • Like 1

It won't be the gasket that caused the initial leak of combustion gasses into the cooling system. The combination of cylinder pressure and not enough clamping pressure on the head studs will have been the initial issue.

Just be prepared for the possibility that you may have already burnt the seal ring on the head gasket, and it may never seal regardless of how much clamp pressure you manage to crank it down with the ARP's.

  • Like 1

Royce is running 760 hp through an unopened neo with arp studs (swapped with head still on, 2nd last page of rb25 dyno results)

Maybe PM him for advice?

I dont doubt the neo pushing that much for a second. But they only last so long. Id you're building a motor youd be crazy not to go a metal gasket.

Its definitely under torqued.

Thanks for the help guys. It was also running a 52mm ebay radiator that the end tanks were all warped on when I took it out, when we felt the front after a few power runs it was barely warm, so could have also contributed. I have replaced it with a Z series 53mm koyo now, and re-torqued the head last night to 130nm. Failing that then I'll probably rip the head off again, re-drill for 26 studs and tomei MLS gasket.

Hopefully I haven't burnt the seal ring as you state GTRNUR. When I checked them after first getting the cams out, they were all 80ft/lb still, and I remember taking my time when I did it and getting it spot on. So I think it is just a case of not enough clamping pressure overall.

Has not had an issue with pushing coolant until this last tune on e85/26psi. Prior to that was running 20psi with toluene mix and never had a problem.

I have suffered this problem before too. In my experience extra torque wont be enough to stop it from lifting the head again. It is going to keep doing it unless your lucky and the gasket is still ok and you turn the power down back to roughly where it was on the old tune. Somewhere between your old power level and new power level there is too much cylinder pressure for the setup to handle. Otherwise you will just need to bite the bullet and rip head off, fit bigger head studs and MLS gasket and be done with it.

Ripps is running 1300Hp on RB25 studs, they only went to RB26 when chasing 1400hp, no oringing the blocks either.

Use the ARP lube or else your torque will be way off and use a multi layer steel Head gasket.

Watch this, may explain to why not to use oil and why to use the right stuff....

  • Like 1

Just thought I would report back guys.

Re-torqued the head to 142nm, just used lucas assy lub under the nut surface and on stud thread, installed a koyo 53mm rad with shroud.

Now running fine again, pushed it hard on the weekend and didn't see anything over 70C, coolant levels in the reservoir tank still perfect after topping it up. Still on 26 pound.

Might have got lucky.

Anyway cheers for all the help.

  • Like 1
  • 7 months later...

Hey guys,

Thought I would bump this thread as I seem to be in trouble again. Ended up taking the head off as it started to push coolant yet again.

I chucked the 202-4301's in the corner, and went the 202-4309 studs. Replaced with a tomei 1.2mm metal HG. Everything was fine for a while, went to a track day last weekend, got home, and the coolant reservoir had puked a little bit. I noticed as well that it appeared to be breaking down right at the top of limiter (7500). This could also be spark related, but I would bet that it's coolant causing the issue.

So question is, where too from here? I was thinking about re-tapping for L19's. I would like to go back for a re-tune for 30psi, but it's just not possible until I sort out this shit.

Has anyone had any similar experiences and how did you resolve?

How have people re-tapped the block in car? I imagine a drill guide is used like this possibly:

http://www.carbatec.com.au/portable-drill-guide_c21832

I would really love to hear what boost people are running with what studs. It may be possible that I have another issue like warped head/block instead, and I am barking up the wrong tree by going larger studs.

Cheers.

If Rips can do 1300 hp (boost is irrelevant at this point) on 25 studs then studs (if they are properly torqued down) are probably not your problem. Maybe your gasket is a problem or maybe the head and / or block need to be trued.

  • Like 1

It all started when I went to e85, and probably increased cylinder pressures along with it. Was fine at 500awhp when it had the 98/toluene tune. Has never been overheated either and had the head skimmed when I fitted the gasket.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...