Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am building my R32 (build thread on this website under that section), and have ordered the Brian Crower 2.9L stroker setup for it. So far I have all of the oiling mods (including Tomei oil pump), and am gonig with 86.5mm bores with CP 8.5:1 pistons. I also jumped the gun and ordered some GT2860-7 turbos since they were on sale when I was initially ordering things for my car before I knew the stock 2.6L crank was bad. I will likely run these turbos for a year or so and then go straight to a single turbo setup BW EFR 7670 or BW EFR 8374.

I am wondering which cams I should go with that may possibly cover both setups or if I should just go stock now and a larger set later.

What do you guys think about Tomei Type A poncams? type B? BC offerings?

Those with actual 2.8 or 2.9l stroker builds please chime in. I have searched through the dyno databases and haven't found a solid comparable setup yet.

Thank You

Patrick

I think the general concensus is that neither of the poncam choices really offer anything worthwhile. Big cams and "responsive" are not really directly related anyway. If you were to fit the poncams and wanted to enhance responsiveness you'd pretty much have to be looking at adjustable cam gears anyway, and setting the overlap to make them work better at the lower end of the rev range.

Now, you could do that with your stock cams anyway. Keep that in mind.

The other thing is....if the chances are that your turbos are not really going to be large enough to keep up with the stroker, or at least are going to be pushed towards their limits, then you probably don't really need to add any extra breathing ability to the engine.

If it were me, I would build it with the stockers and get it set up. See what you get. If it looks like you should be able to lean on the turbos and you want more power, then it isn't hard to slip cams in (unless you go large enough to need to make changes to the head.) On that note, you might look at what else you could do with the money that you might spend on cams and gears in the head area. You could look at making the necessary preparations to accept high lift cams (springs, retainer upgrades, reliefs, etc), and maybe even some light duty port cleanup or something. Things that will make the engine better (even if they don't all enhance power now) but will make it easier to get bigger cams into it later should you go down that path with the bigger turbo.

And seriously ask BC what cams they recommend to go with a 2.9 kit.

  • Like 1

For response you want low duration 250-260° with as much lift as you can get, in my rb30 I used a jun 264 with 10.5mm of lift and it sounded like a factory idle.

Piggaz is using a 260 with 10.8mm but wants to try a 250 and his car is 2.8L

But with -7s you may as well leave the factory cams in it cause they will won't flow real high into the rev range anyway

Don't use a drop in cam if you're going to all that effort of building a stroker engine. That's like mixing everything for a cake, putting it in the baking dish and not turning the oven on!

As Brett said, something with not much duration and big lift. My tuner and myself went through this a few years ago. We spun up a JUN. 264 @ 10.5 and a Tomei 270@ 10.25 and found the ramp rates to be very very mild.... So we made our own which was actually a Alfa Romeo NA Lobe and stuck them onto RB sticks. 260 @ 10.85 mm. ( they also use stock buckets) Don't forget, you'll need a decent valve spring with cams with agro ramp rates.

There are a few VQ lobes which are of interest. One is a 248 @ 10.56 mm iirc. Can always try and get that lobe put on an RB stick.

Doing a bit of research online shows the following:

Description, Advertised Duration (IN/EX), duration at .050" (IN/EX), max lift (mm) (IN/EX)

Stock, 256/256, 209/206, 8.51/8.18

Poncam R, 250/250, 216/218, 9.15/9.15

Poncam A, 260/252, 222/214, 9.15/9.15

Poncam B, 260/260, 222/224, 9.15/9.15 (uses exact same intake cam as Poncam A but longer duration exhaust cam).

BC Stage2, 264/264, 222/224, 9.14/9.19

Honestly I have a hard time believing that there would be little difference in powerband between these cams and stock cams. All gain 0.64mm of intake lift and ~1mm of exhaust lift, all gain at least 7 deg on intake and exhaust at .050". It also shows that the ramp rates of these are all substantially quicker than stock as the "advertised duration" and "duration at .050" are spread far apart on the stock cam vs. the others on the list. It also tells me that the BC stage2 (only ones I see that they sell for the RB26) are very similar to Poncam B. Note, we didn't get to the "pro" larger lift/duration cams (requiring use of larger springs, etc) yet.

I like how the mine's cams have larger lift and mild duration. Big duration to me often lets boost blow out the cylinders, but the lift helps all around if you get the ramp rates correct.

FYI I will already have stiffer springs in the engine...not sure about titanium retainers yet or not, but at the minimum manley replacement valve springs which have a nice increase over stock seat and @lift spring pressures.

And I think the reason cams get a bad rap is that they are expensive and a lot of work for the HP gains...$2000 in turbos can make FAR more HP than $1000 in cams and springs.

Edited by HarrisRacing

Sorry if it sounded like that...just trying to add more data to the pool so I can make a more educated decision. Your input is appreciated greatly.

What I was noticing were things like someone taking a stock or aftermarket camshaft and dialing them in using adjustable cam gears and still making great power increase with NO changes to cam duration or lift whatsoever, but simply changing overlap timing by changing cam timing.

One example is on post #19 of this thread: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93880-rb26-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/

He makes 17 more KW and greater power everywhere in the curve from just changing cam timing...seems like a lot of power increase from rotating cams and from what I read most people don't move them more than a few degrees apart.

In the list of durations of "bolt in" cams there is clearly more than just 4 degrees of cam timing changes going on and it's leading me to believe that there should be more room in there even on the smaller turbos that I will be running to gain some response from changing out the factory cams and likely even more response when I get them timed right on the dyno.

Edited by HarrisRacing

Like what Brett and Paul are trying to tell you, its not just about the specs the manufacturer gives you ie duration and lift

Cam lobe aggression plays an important role in how quickly/much air gets into your cylinder.

All these cams you quoted are very mild in terms of lobe design. Do what the guys are saying, either keep your standard cams for your -7s or if your going to change to a big single get the custom cams from UNIGROUP here in Aus.. they re not cheap but why go to the trouble to do a half assed job.

PS cant you micro wave a cake Paul?

Cams are easy to explain, lift=Horsepower, duration=rev range, higher the duration the higher the revs required before they start working.

Pon cams don't have enough lift available for the amount of duration and the gains suffer because of it.

  • Like 1

Stock duration with 11 mm lift

Barely a month to the day that its going to be a replay of last year - I am looking forward to further discussion on these things. Oh what I wouldn't do for a way of testing things like this along with a bunch of "top" off the shelf alternatives.

Thank you for this thread, I was going to ask the same question. Difference is I have a rb26 with 83/74. So you guys reckon the ''PROCAM 260 10.8mm lift'' a better choice versus my Poncam Type-B 260 9.15mm ?? I need to know because I'm bulding the head so I don't care about cam not fitting, we'll work it out.

I thought the lift was what make the idle lumpy and rought ? I guess it's the duration then ?

Stock duration with high lift will idle exactly as stock. Stock lift with 290deg duration will idle like a race car.

Of course, you actually often need extra duration to be able to package more lift onto a lobe, otherwise the ramp rates can become excessive and valve contol becomes difficult. I spent some time designing some cam profiles for my ALFA (that I never got around to trialling) and most of what I wanted wasn't doable - 13mm lift with not much more than 105-248 (the best stock cams) duration.

Cams are easy to explain, lift=Horsepower, duration=rev range, higher the duration the higher the revs required before they start working.

260 Pon cams don't have enough lift available for the amount of duration and the gains suffer because of it.

This is the simplest answer to the question :)

Lift will give torque every where duration will give HP in the top end, top end horse power comes at the cost of low end torque

My car came with 260 poncams I the changed then to 250 poncams and everything happened 800-1000rpm sooner with the same peak power and made the car a lot nicer to drive in the low rpm range for DD

NAs need velocity to get their best which is why long duration cams work for them but turbos need volume which is why high lift works for turbos

My philosophy with turbos is get the cams to take care of the pre boost area which will load motor off boost helping the turbos came on sooner and then let the boost take care of the top end

This is the simplest answer to the question :)

Lift will give torque every where duration will give HP in the top end, top end horse power comes at the cost of low end torque

My car came with 260 poncams I the changed then to 250 poncams and everything happened 800-1000rpm sooner with the same peak power and made the car a lot nicer to drive in the low rpm range for DD

NAs need velocity to get their best which is why long duration cams work for them but turbos need volume which is why high lift works for turbos

My philosophy with turbos is get the cams to take care of the pre boost area which will load motor off boost helping the turbos came on sooner and then let the boost take care of the top end

Works for NA's because they have atmospheric exhaust back pressure, when a turbo engine has boost pressure higher than exhaust manifold back pressure then you can choose an NA cam (almost).

Works for NA's because they have atmospheric exhaust back pressure, when a turbo engine has boost pressure higher than exhaust manifold back pressure then you can choose an NA cam (almost).

The explanation depends on how much detail you want to go into on it, simple answer is the cams barely close so the air keeps moving though motor faster

This is the simplest answer to the question :)

Lift will give torque every where duration will give HP in the top end, top end horse power comes at the cost of low end torque

My car came with 260 poncams I the changed then to 250 poncams and everything happened 800-1000rpm sooner with the same peak power and made the car a lot nicer to drive in the low rpm range for DD

NAs need velocity to get their best which is why long duration cams work for them but turbos need volume which is why high lift works for turbos

My philosophy with turbos is get the cams to take care of the pre boost area which will load motor off boost helping the turbos came on sooner and then let the boost take care of the top end

I can assume based on your signature that this is with stock turbos and stock displacement? Also assuming stock springs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...