Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That is extreme.. I don't do much highway driving, but the best I have done in the past was about 730km with just a smidge under 1/4 tank showing on the gauge. Wasn't economy driving.. sat on 100-110km/h, 4 people in the car with a boot load of luggage. After re-filling the tank, it worked out to 7.6L/100km. theoretically, an 80L tank should be able to do over 1000km with that figure, but no-way would I push it that far!

Hybrids don't do that well on the highway anyway. They shine in the city.

  • Like 2

@sonicii So the tank size is 80L yeah? Cze I have a friend who has a 2005 V35 coupe and he keeps saying that his car does not have a 80L tank.. is it different from series 1 to 2 in terms of fuel tank size?

Yes they are 80L trust me :)

I have filled up 76.41L at a servo & was still running on Reserve at the time..

Petrol Light can take you 75kms from memory :)

I was trying to look for my notes before posting my response, but don't know where I dotted them down!!! :(

Here we are...

The 14.7kms per Litre & 15.7kms per Litre snap shot readings prior the English Conversion.

I have managed 16.7kms per Litre but no snapshot for proof...

I will upload my 'Hypermiling' records with the English Coversion readings in April :)

Stay tuned peeps...

post-139129-0-77843300-1425119766_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-37237400-1425119781_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-58045800-1425119798_thumb.jpg

Edited by PaulReeves.com - GPOWER.TV
  • Like 1

Same with the M35 Stageas, the gauges seem fairly...approximate. I've noticed mine now seems to get down to a bit below a quarter, then bounce back up to a bit below half. I've just taken to filling up every 4-500km and seem to get 50-60 litres in the tank at that point depending on the mix of driving.

You can fix this with a cotton tip :-)

Take your back seat off, open your fuel lids, pull out the sensors and clean the metal contacts with the cotton tip.

Make sure you change the Orings for the tank lid, good opportunity to change the fuel filter too.

  • 2 weeks later...

Correct, my V35 Skyline would always show over full for at least the first 40-50 kms :)

Mine does the same. At first I though my fuel sensor was faulty as id didnt start to drop until I had done 50-60kms.

Just out of curiosity, has anyone with an auto coupe worked out the fuel consumption if they only drove with the little switch near the shifter set to snow or power? I think it would be interesting to see if snow saves you fuel, or if its just a rumour...

Just out of curiosity, has anyone with an auto coupe worked out the fuel consumption if they only drove with the little switch near the shifter set to snow or power? I think it would be interesting to see if snow saves you fuel, or if its just a rumour...

I doubt it would make any improvement.. in fact it may make it worse.. you would need more throttle input to accelerate the same, meaning you have more TC slip, which wastes power in heat.

These engines don't really benefit much with lower RPM with economy. My V35 returns better highway fuel economy than my wife's J31 maxima, despite the V35 running about 500RPM higher at 100km/h

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

I am getting 6.5L-6.8L per 100kms travel readings so far.

That is from Sydney to Newcastle distances & cruising between 90km-115km p/h depending on hill or downslope!

Tomorrow & Thursday is the time where I start to test it out further as I have 1,600km to do :)

I have finally completed the testing over the weekend @ Hay Plains, NSW.

Balranald to Hay.

6.0L/100kms (60-65km p/h) Distance: 1,333kms!

6.1L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,311kms!

6.2L/100kms (70-75km/p/h) Distance: 1,290kms!

6.3L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,269kms!

6.4L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,250kms!

6.5L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,230kms!

6.6L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,212kms!

6.7L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,194kms!

6.8L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,176kms!

6.9L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,159kms!

7.0L/100kms (---) Distance: 1,142kms!

Formula: 80L/6.0L=1,333kms

Consumption depends on speed, throttle pressure & endulation (flat to hills).

My constant consumption sits on 6.8L on the highway :)

Fuel Range Readings are nearly always innacurate.

As it requires hundreds kms of driving on the same fuel consumption profile for it to deliver an accurate reading!!!

But the above math formula does the work for you :)

Enjoy...

post-139129-0-02583200-1429487495_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-38669500-1429487538_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-76926800-1429487566_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-33052800-1429487599_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-34049700-1429487644_thumb.jpg

post-139129-0-21337600-1429487675_thumb.jpg

Fuel Range Readings are nearly always innacurate.

As it requires hundreds kms of driving on the same fuel consumption profile for it to deliver an accurate reading!!!

But the above math formula does the work for you :)

Enjoy...

Hey Paul, where did you get your software conversion done from?

Hey Paul, where did you get your software conversion done from?

Nagoya Motors in Caringbah, NSW do them.

  • 6 months later...

I have a 2001 300GT, it does about 12.5L/100km daily (driving to work, a bit start and stop, but also some motorway driving, about a 20km trip each way) and 10L/100km on the motorway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...