Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All, can someone give me a guide to what i should eat (or not) before and after exercise? Is there some trade off between weight loss/work out intensity/recovery?

Eg if i eat simple carbs before would that help with energy level during a workout, but also mean i don't get into a fat burning phase?

I do 45-60mins of weights then a little cardio. No specific goals other than too keep loosing weight, but bulk/strength is always good. I've stopped eating lunch and that is working well to loose the weight, and i'm not finding it very difficult. I'm only a bit overweight but have some medical conditions that mean i need to be more careful with weight than most people.

from everything what I have read, skipping meals is not a good long term way to lose weight, as your body starts hoarding fat.

they recommend frequent small meals. even if you have a light snack. nuts, even though they are high in fat, are recommended for snacks, as they tend to give you a full feeling for longer.

I am going through a similar phase at the moment, where I am trying to shave off a bit of weight. do my sessions in the morning, with some carbs either before or after the workout, and then trying to lay off the carbs as much as possible for the rest of the day. I am having smaller main meals, but am having snacks in between, such as eggs, cottage cheese and cucumber between breakfast and lunch, cashews, then protein shake between lunch and dinner and usually another egg. usually don't have much after dinner, and I try to eliminate all carbs for dinner.

Me, if I'm training in the morning I like oats or a couple of weetbix with a banana some chia seeds, wheat germ and LSA, all covered in a protein shake about 1 hr prior to training (this is my typical breakfast).

Arvo training is whatever I can get (real food, tin of beans or quick rice and some lemon and pepper or the like) with a shake, again at least 1 hr prior.

If I don't have at least a hour to digest or if I eat to much I feel bloated and my training suffers.

Post is a protein shake with a 1/4 cup of oats at the completion of my session, the quick oats work fine in the shake, just leave it sit for a minute or two then chew and drink your fill.

Technical information warning: Carbs do magic things in your guts when mixed with protein and makes the protein usable or some other black magic.

Don't miss lunch, try to eat every 3-4 hours, eating lots of small meals makes your metabolism work.

Its pretty easy finding food and protein powder is so convenient.

I do admit I find it hard working out size portions, but then I'm a glutton.

I'm not expert but id say if you want to loose fat then , maybe keep the workouts shorter and more intense, say 30mins with shorter rest periods and then 30mins of cardio.

Keep the carbs low and increase protein and healthy fats, maybe drop dairy products out. Avoid simple sugars or only have them straight after the workout with a protein drink.

I've found a good meal I have twice a day is a bowl of spinach, 1 tomato, a tin of salmon and some rice, mix this with a little mayo and its a filling healthy meal. You could also try cycling the carbs by one day each week having a lot then the next few days have very low carbs.

oh and you want to drink a lot of water.

Edited by AngryRB

Pretty simple.

Lose weight = eat less calories than you use.

Other than that it's all 1%-ers . This includes PWO's and the million ways to eat food and when.

When you work out , you get tired. Understand it is worth it and don't try and get around it.

Meet the fatigue with commitment and learn to push through it.

You will be stronger mentally. Long term you will be stronger overall, because you know what lifts the weight /completes the workout. You. You back yourself. Not the $90 pre workout cordial or some magical food ritual you need to undertake. Pretty much , shedding body mass is going to make you tired. If you aren't tired then it's not working. Looking to make tireness something to drink away is a sure fire way to make your workouts a cop out.

In terms of how many meals and other things. If you are doing the work and your calorie balance at the end of the day is negative, you will lose body mass.

Skipping lunch isn't the best way to do things but, if thats what you need to lose calorie wise for the meals to add up then no drama. You might prefer to down size the portions of the other meals to allow for lunch. This has some 1%-er metabolisim benifits but, mostly you will feel less miserable. Being miserable is probably your biggest enemy so try and change things in a way that you preferably like and would live with permanently.

  • Like 2

People over complicate this stuff way too much. Special nuts and eating during a solar eclipse, concoctions of synthesised drug lab fat and protein mixes void of carbs (which actually help you lift weights).

Calories in and calories out; pretty much what rev said.

There are no magic calories that appear on the body without you eating. The body also cannot move without consuming calories. These laws of biology are non negotiable. There are other factors that affect how this process works, the 1%ers rev talks about, but the process itself is static. And people who say they can't lose weight are ALWAYS doing one of two things: 1. Eating crap food or too much food, or 2. Shit exercise or not enough of it. The rest of the little tricks like timing of meals and quantities and all that are just excuses and mind tricks trying to get past the stuff that actually makes a difference - good food and good exercise.

Take shit food out of your diet. You know what this food is, your mother taught you when you were 5. It doesn't taste as good as the bad food. If you're not losing weight after that, then eat less food or lift more and heavier weights. People think just because they're at the gym doing exercise means they're making up for the bad food they've eaten?

Cardio burns fat, but nothing like an intense weights session that puts the body into a catabolic state, using calories long after you stop exercise. People find it hard to believe that I complete on average only 2 x 40 minute sessions of intense weight lifting a week and eat what I eat. Fast metabolism usually gets the credit for it, because I guess it's easier for them to blame fat ass genetics than it is to get off that fat ass and make changes.

  • Like 1

it's easier for them to blame fat ass genetics than it is to get off that fat ass and make changes.

+1 well said. No health issues can be treated with burgers and chips.

I tried the whole 'eat every two hours' stuff (usually a green apple or something like that). Made no difference. Only difference was kJ in < kJ out. Eat less crap, work out more.

Thanks everyone.

FWIW I outsource my understanding of contentious science (like climate change and nutrition) and just go with what Dr Karl is saying, because I like the way his brain works. For weight loss, the only thing that's strongly supported by science is eating less calories (assuming excise is constant). Stuff like timing of meals and type of food is less well supported. Since skipping lunch is easy for me to achieve, I think its more useful to me than trying to do the lots of small meals thing, which is less strongly supported by the science and, for me, in unlikely to be something i'll stick to. So the effort/payoff doesn't make sense for me.

Has anyone heard about the "dont eat for an hour after workout if you want to loose weight" idea? I'm concerned that doing that would compromise recovery.

Edit: Interesting that eating every two hours didnt work for you Ravi - I think ill continue to discount that unless there's some strong science to support it. I have a feeling that the slowing metabolism from fasting thing is also way overstated. 5/2 diet is working for a number of people i know, and you would think it could trigger slowing metabolism, if that's really a thing.

ive lost 15kg in the last 12-14 months. i was 78 now i am 63. I go to gym 3 times a week for an about 75 mins.

on a usual day i will get up and have a coffee (cant live without it) and then i will have oats for breakfast. about 10 i will have a protien shake and a banana. lunch i will have at 2-3pm, a salad roll i make myself with ham, cheese, tomato and lettuce. Having lunch that bit later means i dont snack on shit before... Dinner i will have chicken or steak and 3 veggies. No desert.

You get used to eating less. dont skip meals eat less more often. eat half what u would normally have and if you are still hungry half an hour later go eat the rest. dont eat so much u feel full and have trouble moving. if you dont load up you dont give ur body the opportunity to put on weight. get used to being hungry before you eat. dont eat after 730-830 at night.

After a workout i will have a protien shake and then wait about an hour to eat. Im not looking to bulk up at all just want to be healthy/fit.

Lastly you wouldnt overfill your car, so why overfill your body?

  • Like 1

Just watch that "biggest loser" tv show, they do a lot of exhausting training then they get nothing but healthy food to eat.

Its all in the mind, probably easier to do if you play a sport cause then its not such a chore.

Also with sports, (depending on the sport) constant direction changing movements are better than running at a constant rate IMO. I'm too lazy/unco to do either, so I just lift whatever I can (light weights).

Thanks everyone.

FWIW I outsource my understanding of contentious science (like climate change and nutrition) and just go with what Dr Karl is saying, because I like the way his brain works. For weight loss, the only thing that's strongly supported by science is eating less calories (assuming excise is constant). Stuff like timing of meals and type of food is less well supported. Since skipping lunch is easy for me to achieve, I think its more useful to me than trying to do the lots of small meals thing, which is less strongly supported by the science and, for me, in unlikely to be something i'll stick to. So the effort/payoff doesn't make sense for me.

Has anyone heard about the "dont eat for an hour after workout if you want to loose weight" idea? I'm concerned that doing that would compromise recovery.

Edit: Interesting that eating every two hours didnt work for you Ravi - I think ill continue to discount that unless there's some strong science to support it. I have a feeling that the slowing metabolism from fasting thing is also way overstated. 5/2 diet is working for a number of people i know, and you would think it could trigger slowing metabolism, if that's really a thing.

Like has been said, fat/weight loss is calories in vs, calories out...

For training performance optimization., keep your larger meals with higher carbs around/throughout training and your fattier meals further away.

6meals x 500calories =3000 calories..... 3meals x 1000calories = 3000calories, your body doesn't care.

p.s.That 5/2 diet is a pos mainstream bastardisation of a method that had been researched and put into far better practice well before its time. Of course it works, its calorie restriction.

If your having trouble losing weight then it would help to have 6 smaller meals rather than 3 big ones. The more you have at one time the more ichance some is stored as fat

and drink heaps of water

Also get up every morning, take a piss or shit then weigh yourself. do it again the next day. keep an eye on this, and if you want to lose weight eat less than the previous day or different foods and see what effect that had. If you want to weigh more eat more than the previous day.

If your having trouble losing weight then it would help to have 6 smaller meals rather than 3 big ones. The more you have at one time the more ichance some is stored as fat

if you aren't chasing 1%-ers, 1,2,3 or 10 meals is fine. People having trouble losing weight that aren't figure athletes need not bother and stick to the calorie adjustment.

Like has been said, fat/weight loss is calories in vs, calories out...

6meals x 500calories =3000 calories..... 3meals x 1000calories = 3000calories, your body doesn't care.

If your having trouble losing weight then it would help to have 6 smaller meals rather than 3 big ones. The more you have at one time the more ichance some is stored as fat

a deficit is a deficit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...