Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Km won't be genuine as it has the nismo cluster fitted and most of the parts that indicate wear have been swapped for aftermarket bits and pieces.

Price seems a bit steep for what it is. (Based on what is actually in the ad)

4 door headlights, bonnet swap, 400r front bar suggest to me that it may have had a front ender. Would be something to look at in person. Hard to tell from pictures.

That car has a long and very chequered past. Has been in Aus ( Brisbane ) since the 90's and although very rough underneath had a huge amount of money spent on it back in the day. It was originally midnight purple and was confiscated under the proceeds of crime act and left in storage for several years which stuffed the original paint. I'm not sure what was done to the motor after it had been sitting unstarted for years. You may or may not get some answers from the current owner. It's got a lot of good gear in it ( no pun intended ), and I reckon if the compression/leak down test came up fine, it would be a great car for $35k. Little bit too blingy for my liking.

Whilst I understand that everyone here is only trying to help, it would absolutely shit me to tears if the car in question were mine....

People surmising that it's been in an accident, others saying it was impounded because it was drug funded (I'm not saying that's not true, but as if that matters...), some saying it's too expensive, etc, etc....

All of this is hearsay. If you're interested in the car, go and check it out.

I have personally seen this car on the road and it looks and sounds incredible. This is coming from a GT-R owner that currently has his car for sale. I could rubbish the car all day because it would be beneficial for me to sway someone onto my car, however I'm not like that and too much of it goes on in the car scene.

Go check the car out. From what I saw of it, it was a very nice vehicle.

  • Like 2

It is a very nice car, and I have known the history of it and it's original owner in Australia since the late 90's. I don't need to go into any more personal details here.

I know the mechanic who used to service the car and I have seen the condition of the car before and after it was modified to it's current state of tune. I, and plenty of other people in Brisbane know exactly what the original owner did and had happen to him and the car ( old rego "Fussy" ). Facts. Not hearsay.

As I said, this car had almost unlimited $ thrown at it a long time ago and I assume more over the last few years to get it tuned for cane juice. Most GTR's have rail and other accident damage. Most get repaired properly and you don't have an issue if they have been done right. This car sat at impound for a long time and I was keen on buying it myself about 10 years ago, but managed for find a very tidy one for sale, before the Police had this one auctioned off.

I would own it at $35k, ( it's had more than three times that spent on it ). As long as the car checked out fine, which I would expect it to, it would be a great purchase. A colourful history is nothing much to worry about. Those bloody headlights are another matter.

  • Like 1

I wondered if this was "Fussy" I remember the car from back in the day(2001). I remember seeing it in the driveway of (probably) the owners house on the Southside with another gtr can't rememeber what model I think it was another r33 gtr and it was pretty obvious the guy living there had some serious cash flow going on

A. That's what car forums are for - enthusiasts helping enthusiasts. If a seller can't stand people discussing their car, then don't advertise it.

B. Hearsay - something completely different to what you think it is.

A. That's what car forums are for - enthusiasts helping enthusiasts. If a seller can't stand people discussing their car, then don't advertise it.

B. Hearsay - something completely different to what you think it is.

A - That's fine and OVA 300 may know the car, but the statement he made about it being "very rough underneath" would be enough to deter some (myself included) from even going to see the car. A GTR with rail damage isn't something I'd cough up large amounts of money for. I'd rather have photographs or view the car in person to be sure, that's all I'm saying.

B - Let's not argue semantics, I meant it couldn't be substantiated via posts on a forum, which it can't. I wasn't speaking in a legal sense. What I said was apt in the context in which it was said.

Edited by kawasakirider

Mate if someone says a car is too expensive there is nothing wrong with that, my opinion is i would rather spend 40k on a R34 GTR and i gave my opinion.

Funny what you can find on a Google search.


Archive.org has a archive of the auction listing for the "FUSSY" R33 GTR: https://web.archive.org/web/20110223220127/http://www.lexsimshauser.com.au/p197-nissan-skyline-fussy

VIN is the same as the car in the link if you check licence plate on the TMR: https://www.service.transport.qld.gov.au/checkrego


So OVA 300 was on the money. Doesn't mean the car is crap though, just that it has a checkered past (and a whole lot of money spent on it).


Looks pretty good in the auction photos and even better in the current photos. I'd check the "rough underneath" carefully though!

Edited by BuuBox

I think it's only fair to say that it all depends on what YOU want. It is after all going to be your purchase and will sit in your garage - R33 or R34 GTR doesn't matter - which do you prefer? :)

People can speculate backgrounds of anything all day, but until you see it in person and make a fair assessment for yourself, it's not really doing the vehicle any justice, is it? Kind of unfair to the seller too in some respects I feel.

If you like what you see, pay for an inspection and get it checked mechanically if you are still uncertain of it's condition.

As I said above. I've known the car and the original owner for a long time. I know it had some rail/sill damage. I suspect that it would have been properly repaired, as the car has had massive amounts of $ spent on it, and the original owner was indeed, Fussy. I would own it, if I didn't already have one. My own car had minor damage and squashed sections of sills ( like so many GTR's do, with their butter soft sills ) when I bought it. Hell, my car was an ex track/street car from Japan and has millions of pop rivets in it. I have no idea how many k's the car has done, only that the Tomei forged motor was built 14000k's before I purchased the car. The compression checked out perfect, and I've had 14 months of blasting around in it without issue, both on road, and on the track. The original poster in this thread wanted our thoughts and info on the car. He now has it, and can make a more informed decision on whether or not to look at/buy it. I will not be putting up all the information I know about the original owner of this car, as it's nobody else's business, and I'm not in any way trying to hurt the sale of this car. I'm sure there are plenty more GTR's sold that have colourful pasts/parts/actual odometer readings that people have been mislead about. The current owner would have known the background to this vehicle and has obviously had a lot of enjoyment out of it for the last few years.

It would be a steal at $35k and fair at $40k.

Money talks. Bullshit walks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...