Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking into buying an R34 GTR, had a seller take the car of interest to a reputable workshop of my choice this morning for an inspection.

Compression test results are as follows:

C1 - 145

C2 - 147

C3 - 152

C4 - 148

C5 - 148

C6 - 130

Leak down test results:

C1 - 6.5%

C2 - 6%

C3 - 5%

C4 - 7%

C5 - 9%

C6 - 15%

Now, the motor has been rebuilt and has forgies etc that were done mid 2013 (seller has provided receipts). It has apparently only done ~ 6000kms since rebuild... But obviously I have my concerns.

After speaking with the owner of the shop who did the inspection he ensures me it is a solid example and will give me no grief for daily use. (No track work as it doesn't interest me + I live in the sticks).

Told me it pulls very hard and after performing a leak down test he has narrowed the cause of lower compression in cylinder # 6 down to the rings.

I am sure some of you folks have been through a similar situation in the past so I guess my questions are:

- Should I walk away?

- Should I run away?

- Is the deviation between the first five cylinders to the sixth of serious concern?

Any info/advice/experience will be greatly appreciated and help me make the right decision as these cars are not cheap!

Cheers

Edited by shaunus
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453786-rb26-compression-test-results/
Share on other sites

I had turfed the idea of buying that particular GTR the minute Fats said "walk away"hahaha.

You have to keep in mind that Fatz will probably lowball the guy, snatch the car out from under you and turn it into a track whore or wreck it for profit. Ulterior motives are ulterior! :P

  • Like 1

Walk away or budget to pull it apart, hone it and re-ring it. It wasn't run in properly.

This is in all probability what has happened. Yes it should get redone - but budget that and if the numbers stack up and the car is still good why not?

Link to car?

http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Nissan-Skyline-1999/SSE-AD-3066429/?Cr=4

To be honest mate, spending 50k on a car you'd want it to be near on perfect mechanically. I don't have the time nor patience to be bothered pulling the motor.

  • Like 1

a set of mild cams would drop the comp 30psi on a comp test, if that were the case those numbers would start to become decent..

In most other similar posts everyone is fine with a 10percent variance so why the walk away in this case?

Edited by AngryRB

a set of mild cams would drop the comp 30psi on a comp test, if that were the case those numbers would start to become decent..

In most other similar posts everyone is fine with a 10percent variance so why the walk away in this case?

A set of mild cams should affect all cylinders unless it's a scatter cam for a Mini. Besides, the leakdown results scale perfectly with compression results, indicating that it's all in the rings.

10% variance between cylinders is deemed acceptable for an original engine that's done a lot of miles. Not one that was supposedly recently put together carefully and only done 6000 kays since.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
    • Sweet, yeah hoping stock gears will hold up. May use the transbrake feature on hill climb starts so that will test it.
    • Yeah, the thread is only nearly 20 years old.
    • Been down in Tassie for 2 weeks (a cruise, not a race for once) but spent a little time on her when I got back. I worked out the injector settings in the PowerFC were not correct for nismo 555s, set those to 66% +10ms and added a little air at closed throttle, set the timing (approximately, because it has some weird non 15o cells around idle) and now she starts and idles properly. She purrs like a kitten (ignore the co2 alarm in the background, I did  ) 20250518_171052.mp4 Next step, off for run-in, tuning and alignment!
×
×
  • Create New...