Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's why I plan on getting it tuned with the rb25 turbo I have on there at the moment, if it's fun at that stage of power I'll probably stick with it for quite a while before going for a turbo upgrade

I found in the US DSM and EVO take off 16G turbos for like $200 you can get a housing from kinugawa for them for like $250. Talking USD here but if you bought a RB25 already you might as well just rebuild that. You probably could get EVO 3 and lower or VR4 16G turbos in Australia for a good price I would bet.

2530 @ 1.1kpa *1000

Z32 AFM

some sort of performance exhaust system (duh)

ARC 105mm SMIC

101.5 RON fuel (about the same as ultra-premium in JP)

= 220kw at wheels with stock injectors @ 99% duty cycle (which is not good, but you get the point).

Replace the injectors and you might pick up another 5~10kw, but you literally NEED to replace the injectors since you don't want to run at 99%.

This is the exact setup me and my friend are using. If you don't have access to fuel above 98 RON, you need a front mount pronto.

And Poncams do make a slight difference in torque. The gears make a difference in response. Here is a video proving such:

See the graph at the end. The torque increase = due to cams, the turbo coming on earlier is due to him having also used adjustable gears. Both together = good improvement. Worth $700? Up to you. I used the Tomei Poncams and Tomei adjustable gears.

For example, if I changed to a RB25 and 2535 or GT-RS, and changed nothing else in the setup, I would make the exact same power level but it would be earlier. The advantage to the RB25 though is if I switched to a front mount it would have a lot more potential. No matter what, the RB20 is going to max out at around 400bhp, whereas the RB25 is capable of 400~500.

That's what I found with my car, ymmv.

Edited by Matvei27
  • Like 1

i already have a front mount and run 98, does running the cams and cam gears together make the turbo come on sooner or is it just the cam gears? i dont plan on getting cams but if cam gears themselves can help response a little that would be good as they're relatively cheap

So what cam gears did you have before the Tomei cams went in?

I bought Tomei Poncams and Tomei cam gears at the same time. Before that was 100% stock. If you run the Poncams without the adjustable gears you will not be able to adjust your tune for more low down power, which is what you want on the RB20DET. Definitely don't get them without the gears. The notion that "they're maximized by Tomei at the factory to run without gears" blah blah blah is bullshit, yes they are designed so you can use them without gears if need-be, but even Tomei admits that using them with gears is better on their rather lengthy technical discussion on the Japanese site. Because it lets you have more control over your results, whereas using them without gears gives you absolutely no control over where they make that power. On a RB20DET you want to adjust the gears for down-low, on a RB25DET you would probably want to adjust them for up high since the RB25DET sacrifices some of the top end.

i already have a front mount and run 98, does running the cams and cam gears together make the turbo come on sooner or is it just the cam gears? i dont plan on getting cams but if cam gears themselves can help response a little that would be good as they're relatively cheap

Here's how it will work:

1. Cam gears alone > improved response (turbo spool earlier)

2. Cams alone > improved torque, especially in the midrange, but doesn't help low-end at all and doesn't increase turbo response.

3. Cams + gears > improved torque + improved response

If you just want to improve response get the gears, but I think the Poncams are worth it for the huge midrange torque improvement they provide. See the graph at the end of the video above.

I wouldn't just get Poncams without the gears, however, since you'll damage your low end response. If you use both together you can get an improvement across the rev range without sacrificing much of anything (except your wallet).

The cams are around $500 US, the gears are $200 US. Aside from getting a better turbo, it is the best $700 you can spend on a RB20DET because for most people it will fix the things they hate about it. It's not an extra 500cc, but it's something.

Just don't get anything bigger than the poncams on a RB20DET, it will suck. The procams are really meant for the RB22 and especially the RB24DET, but Tomei doesn't offer the kits to make those anymore. On the RB25DET, I would still say you should use poncams unless you are doing the Tomei RB28DET kit, in which case use the procams.

That's something I am considering for when the RB20 blows, but mine only has 66,000km on it so that won't be for awhile.

Edited by Matvei27

Tah...my trials showed std cams with cam gears gave me better power everywhere vs cams, inc torque. Playing with the tune/timing etc with cams just got me back to the same place.

But i run a very diffrrent turbo setup and the cams were with both a plazmaman plenum and before the plenum so engines would be working very differently.

My mate swore the drop in cams helped his HKS 2530 setup as well so....many ways to skin a cat

Tah...my trials showed std cams with cam gears gave me better power everywhere vs cams, inc torque. Playing with the tune/timing etc with cams just got me back to the same place.

But i run a very diffrrent turbo setup and the cams were with both a plazmaman plenum and before the plenum so engines would be working very differently.

My mate swore the drop in cams helped his HKS 2530 setup as well so....many ways to skin a cat

Did you use the Poncams or the Procams? The Procams won't help at all. If you were using them you were using the wrong cams.

Edited by Matvei27

i dont really have a set budget although the less i spend the better, in terms of engine work i dont plan on doing anymore after the current things im doing to it, so injectors, afm, nistune, possibly cam gears and turbo

Did you use the Poncams or the Procams? The Procams won't help at all. If you were using them you were using the wrong cams.

Ok,Full Trust TD06-20G setup with std inlet plenum and cams optimised with cam gears all tuned up. I then tried Apexi 260/8.8mm cams and went backwards. Tried different cam gear settings and engine lost response and didnt made the same peak power , never actually catching the std cams. Engine sounded tough but was seemingly over cammed.

gallery_462_50_59282.jpg

So std cams went back in.

After everyone saying how good 6boost manifolds are I sold my Trust manifold and gate and went Turbosmart gate and 6boost

gallery_462_50_656235.jpg

So that was a disaster...spend money to lose power. At this point i tried 256/8.5m Poncams and did stuff all to help response but did make a bit more power. At this point I was desperate for response so in went std cams again which made the thing a little plunchier

So reading about Plazmaman plenums...I thought I would give one of them a try....hopefully grab some improved response

gallery_462_50_44142.jpg

LOL...nope. So going to 6boost and Plazman was a step back ON MY SETUP. Perhaps because my tune and setup was pretty well optimised and proven with a few years of track work before I started trying different things.

For me, if I had stuck with std inlet plenum and Trust manifold and gate my car would have been a good bit quicker than with the bling bolted on.

I lost a headgasket when a hose under the inlet went in traffic so I put in an NA R32 RB25DE that had rebuilt internals. All the bits from my RB20 were swapped over and after a bit of trialling my TD06-20G with an 8cm and 12cm housing and with / without the Poncams put back in...the Poncams in my RB25DE certainly helped the power curve , though didnt really change when it came on

gallery_462_50_22041.jpgEv

Even then we found a problem with the Turbosmart gate so its possible it was leaking on the std cam pull making the setup a bit lazier. With the gate fixed it held boost and made way better top end, around what the RB20 was making. The above plot wasnt full tunes. I just wanted to see the general behavior of the setup of different turbo, housings, cams etc to decide which direction i wanted to take. Ended up going T67 and frankly 12 months later I am going back to my custom billet turbo

SO, after 16 years of playing with my car, 15 of it with an internally std RB20.....from a value perspective the std inlet and cams give the IMO the BEST bang for buck

If you want to run Poncams then there are those that have had good results...but inc tuning, labour and cams its what...at least a $1500 mod and I guess thats up to the individual to say whether that investment is worth the improvement (keeping in mind that some people go backwards)

over 270kw out of an rb20 :O

Feed the things E85

E85, std inlet manifold, a better turbo ...something like a FP HTA 71 or HTA 68 turbo and it would be pretty easy to blow my results away....lol the sh1t you learn getting it wrong :)

Yeah, not to belittle Roy's result, but ~270rwkW was not an uncommmon power level for TD06s on std manifold in Japan back at the turn of the century. The JMS car (here in Aust) was in that territory even before I bought my RB20 car, and that was last century. You'd expect things to have only gotten better with better specced turbos, management, ignition, etc etc.

LOl, the problem with RB20s are just like the JMS car they put the wrong turbo on things and when the result is a compromise they blame the RB20. LOL putting a gate on the std manifold, using a 20G off a rotary with a waay too big A/R turbine housing will certainly make good power and turn tyres...but it was alwaas going to be a compromise. Must be RB20s :(

But that drift Onevia was just a bit of fun....and they knew it was less than optimal

There is nothing special about my setup at all. Those that have done similar / copied have all got the same or better! Just dont put a turbo built for another engine on an RB20 or run a MINES ECU etc etc.

fair enough, while looking at some different turbos i came across this http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-Bolt-On-3-Anti-Surge-RB20DET-RB25DET-TD06H-60-1-T3-8cm-/271795646032?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_15&hash=item3f48486e50 would something like this have good response? much cheaper than garrett or hypergear options which would cover the cost for some cam gears

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...