Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 GTT Turbo Upgrade - Direct Bolt On (almost)


Recommended Posts

Hey all. I know there is a plethora of information about Hypergear turbos on these threads, with Tao providing a heap of Dyno results. I was looking at Hypergear's ATR45-SAT (Special application turbocharger) as it will directly bolt on to my existing setup, with some basic fabrication/relocation of some intake piping, and will suffice for my 300-350rwkw power figure I am after with my current setup for street use. Only thing is he doesnt provide any specs from what I can see on the size of the housings, or any sizings of inlets/outlets, which I thought would be basic information you would provide there for your customers to see when deciding to choose your product, like other turbo sellers do. Has anyone got some of their own feedback and dyno results on that specific turbo? 

Was also looking at Kinugawa turbos that were a direct bolt on, and had heard good things about them, I dont think theyre as popular as they used to be, but has anyone had one recently theyve purchased and used?

 

Any other recommendations with reasoning as to why they went with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ATR45SAT if you are going to run it on Pump 98 fuel with a very free flow engine setup on a very healthy standard engine you will likely be making 280~300rwkws mark and up to 350rwkws on E85 fuel. Turbo is capable of making 400rwkws on externally gated on E85 fuel.

Housing sizing has been updated. The inlet size is 3 inches and outlet size is 2 inches. Hot side is T3 that fits your standard exhaust manifold and dump side is 6 bolts that fits factory dump pipe. Turbo comes with braided oil line, banjo adapters and oil drain adapter.

Client result from Uni group. R34 4 door, with front mount cooler, 3.5 inches turbo back exhaust, 3 inches metal intake pipe, fuel system upgrade and programmable ecu. P98 fuel 307rwkws @ 20psi

image.thumb.jpeg.84b50111099de87cf347f4de076e3f35.jpeg

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Tao tries to keep it simple for what's on the website because he has so many options. If you have specific questions he always talks through it with you. It sounds like you have been reading someone's rants on Facebook. I personally would disregard when every day there's a new one. 

I actually have the turbo you mentioned and love it! It isn't running at its capacity though because I had issues on the dyno preventing it being turned up and haven't gone back to try again. When it was first installed the guys at the shop (wrongly) thought it was faulty and sent it back to tao he happily checked it over thoroughly and even put it on his own car and sent through photos and video of everything. I think thats pretty good after sales service. It turned out they were wrong. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mick Dean said:

I think Tao tries to keep it simple for what's on the website because he has so many options. If you have specific questions he always talks through it with you. It sounds like you have been reading someone's rants on Facebook. I personally would disregard when every day there's a new one. 

I actually have the turbo you mentioned and love it! It isn't running at its capacity though because I had issues on the dyno preventing it being turned up and haven't gone back to try again. When it was first installed the guys at the shop (wrongly) thought it was faulty and sent it back to tao he happily checked it over thoroughly and even put it on his own car and sent through photos and video of everything. I think thats pretty good after sales service. It turned out they were wrong. 

Yeah i had seen some things others had said, even a couple of individuals who are not associated with the current rant going on who had said they were having extreme lag issues as well as a noise from the waste gate which is a concern. I understand Tao and Hypergear have a long history of good products, just hoping that quality is a thing that has continued to this day and not a thing of the past 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, hypergear said:

The ATR45SAT if you are going to run it on Pump 98 fuel with a very free flow engine setup on a very healthy standard engine you will likely be making 280~300rwkws mark and up to 350rwkws on E85 fuel. Turbo is capable of making 400rwkws on externally gated on E85 fuel.

Housing sizing has been updated. The inlet size is 3 inches and outlet size is 2 inches. Hot side is T3 that fits your standard exhaust manifold and dump side is 6 bolts that fits factory dump pipe. Turbo comes with braided oil line, banjo adapters and oil drain adapter.

Client result from Uni group. R34 4 door, with front mount cooler, 3.5 inches turbo back exhaust, 3 inches metal intake pipe, fuel system upgrade and programmable ecu. P98 fuel 307rwkws @ 20psi

image.thumb.jpeg.84b50111099de87cf347f4de076e3f35.jpeg

Is it a concern that my intercooler piping is all 3”? I noticed on your forum about your turbos you mentioned a 600x300x80mm core is recommended, Wouldn’t there be some lag issues with a turbo outlet being 2 inches, going into 3” piping, through a large intercooler and to the intake plenum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LjB123 said:

Wouldn’t there be some lag issues with a turbo outlet being 2 inches, going into 3” piping, through a large intercooler and to the intake plenum?

That is an imaginary problem that dates back to the 90s. The reality is that the volume of that pipework is absolutely tiny compared to the pumping capacity of the turbo as it comes on boost. You can just do the maths yourself to work out how many milliseconds difference it's going to be between 2" and 3" pipework.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, the rant blocked everyone whom left possitive feedbacks and removed their comments. Its a none brainer to workout that guy got issues reading at post he's ranted about others. 

We've built alot of turbos for the past 19 years, some of the big ATR45 turbos are not made for Rb25det, since they all T3 people just fitted  and used them any way. Current models are even more responsive, once fitted to a proper setup.

Put it in this way. if you found current model ATR45SAT extremely laggy, send it back and I will refund you in full.

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, hypergear said:

ATR45 turbos are not made for Rb25det, since they all T3 people just fitted  and used them any way

I am guilty lol.

Wasn't too bad, you get 1bar of boost by 4500rpm provided VCT is functioning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATR45 was an initial model similar to a TD06H-25G, the ATR45SAT in T3 .63 rear housing was developed few years later made to fit Rb25det engines. Current model has better response then earlier models. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I am guilty lol.

Wasn't too bad, you get 1bar of boost by 4500rpm provided VCT is functioning.

What specs did you go with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hypergear said:

First of all, the rant blocked everyone whom left possitive feedbacks and removed their comments. Its a none brainer to workout that guy got issues reading at post he's ranted about others. 

We've built alot of turbos for the past 19 years, some of the big ATR45 turbos are not made for Rb25det, since they all T3 people just fitted  and used them any way. Current models are even more responsive, once fitted to a proper setup.

Put it in this way. if you found current model ATR45SAT extremely laggy, send it back and I will refund you in full.

What would you recommend as a step up from the SAT model to get similar/slightly more power, but external wastegate?

Was looking at getting the external wastegate plumbed back kit you sell. Have you any feedback on how the plumbed back merge goes with back pressure? I see the merge is in a really good spot, as its on a bend and transitions nicely, just heard things about people plumbing back, especially so close to the turbo outlet. Whats your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LjB123 said:

What specs did you go with?

I'm assuming you're asking about my current turbo? 

It's a Garrett GTX3576R Gen 2 with a 1.01 divided turbine housing. Made 437kW with 1.8 tapering down to 1.6bar.

At the time, G series turbos were so new there wasn't much data on them so didn't want try something untested.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I'm assuming you're asking about my current turbo? 

It's a Garrett GTX3576R Gen 2 with a 1.01 divided turbine housing. Made 437kW with 1.8 tapering down to 1.6bar.

At the time, G series turbos were so new there wasn't much data on them so didn't want try something untested.

Im kinda new to the whole turbo thing, im still trying to learn the names of them all and what numbers mean 😂 so many different things its crazy

Had been looking at a GTX3076R, just so many mixed opinions on whats good for what

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

Surely nowadays a G series can be done in a very-nearly-bolt-on-in-stock-location on a RB25 on a stock manifold etc.

Surely.

I have not really looked into it for reasons

Yeah i know Kinugawa turbos (made in Taiwan) have bolt ons for RB25’s in the G series turbos. They were my other option i was looking into for a reasonably priced turbo setup along with Hypergear turbos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I'm not a fan, not enough turbine.

Hence I went with a GTX3576R

Im looking for around 300-350rwkw, as it is purely a weekend street car, and for now that much power is plenty for some fun, as well as not needing to go into forged internals for reliability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LjB123 said:

What would you recommend as a step up from the SAT model to get similar/slightly more power, but external wastegate?

Was looking at getting the external wastegate plumbed back kit you sell. Have you any feedback on how the plumbed back merge goes with back pressure? I see the merge is in a really good spot, as its on a bend and transitions nicely, just heard things about people plumbing back, especially so close to the turbo outlet. Whats your thoughts?

The latest version of bolt on would be the ATR43SS-2 models, turbo is more responsive and has higher power capacity. We have a member in NZ did a built recently with it using the external gate plumb back setup that made a pretty healthy 311rwkws on P98 fuel. Anyone got a link to his build? 

311rwkw.thumb.jpg.d9bbb0fed6924c20e7c5dd10001f907c.jpg

enginebay.thumb.jpg.531dd0f7bba785b036aa582ef5b10843.jpg

gateonturbinehousing.thumb.jpg.8934da92c390d04d429b6ccda6221831.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hypergear said:

The latest version of bolt on would be the ATR43SS-2 models, turbo is more responsive and has higher power capacity. We have a member in NZ did a built recently with it using the external gate plumb back setup that made a pretty healthy 311rwkws on P98 fuel. Anyone got a link to his build? 

311rwkw.thumb.jpg.d9bbb0fed6924c20e7c5dd10001f907c.jpg

enginebay.thumb.jpg.531dd0f7bba785b036aa582ef5b10843.jpg

gateonturbinehousing.thumb.jpg.8934da92c390d04d429b6ccda6221831.jpg

 

 

What turbine housing option was used on this one? What difference would i see between the .63 and .71?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LjB123 said:

What turbine housing option was used on this one? What difference would i see between the .63 and .71?

The one on car above is .63 which is also more responsive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...