Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have a 4" system that is legal ??

Does anyone have a 3.5" that is legal ??

If so, what is it ?

put a Ferrari badge on your car.

They have ridiculously loud exhausts and never seem to be defected.

  • Like 1

Pete

Date for return of car to builder?

Hi Mark, going back first week in June, they will have it until it is all fixed, hopefully :/

I hope I do not get stuffed around anymore, that will really piss me off :rant:

put a Ferrari badge on your car.

They have ridiculously loud exhausts and never seem to be defected.

The badge is worth more than my car :/

Maybe one will fall off and I can find it :whistling:

haha, that hurts :(

Probably more $s spent

Well for the same year model, BUT mechanically mine is virtually new from the radiator to the tail pipe.

I would not swap mine for a 400HP 1999 360 Ferrari :no: Also nowhere to put the kids :)

  • Like 1

Here's my exhaust pete, it is 3 1/2inch and ive been stopped a few times by popo and no issues at all, even my old man is ok in the passenger seat , that means something lol, stainless steel jap system with cat replaced with 100cell and rear muffler is X force, cost $800... without the rear muffler it was terrible, but with the big ass muffler on the back its fine, add another fat muffler in the middle and you'll wonder if the engines even running or not.. :whistling:

post-70965-0-92815400-1431942249_thumb.jpg

post-70965-0-05448900-1431942272_thumb.jpg

Edited by AngryRB

Here's my exhaust pete, it is 3 1/2inch and ive been stopped a few times by popo and no issues at all, even my old man is ok in the passenger seat , that means something lol, stainless steel jap system with cat replaced with 100cell and rear muffler is X force, cost $800... without the rear muffler it was terrible, but with the big ass muffler on the back its fine, add another fat muffler in the middle and you'll wonder if the engines even running or not.. :whistling:

Sounds good Mark, well if I could hear it :whistling:

Just some quotes regarding my fuel situation , if I am going to try and get it all working properly I decided I would rather have over kill than run it on the edge.

Been thinking of getting an Aftermarket Industry surge tank with twin walbro 460lph pump mounted in the surge.

It seems the single walbro 460lph pump should flow around 450kw by itself. The issue is the plastic fitting in the fuel hat.(fuel gets pumped from the pump up through the fuel hat to the outside of the fuel tank via the "hat" then through the stock fuel lines to the engine bay.

On the R34 this hat is a bottle neck as the inside diameter of the fitting is around 3.5mm.

Just need to spend some more money :)

https://youtu.be/zY13FltTn18 is on dyno, and https://youtu.be/2ZjV5Pb5ySc is on a quiet road, full 3 1/2 inch system off GT3076 and external plumb back, only one large muffler at rear... ( excuse the crappy footage and Tein coilover old couch sounds lol)

Edited by AngryRB

https://youtu.be/zY13FltTn18 is on dyno, and https://youtu.be/2ZjV5Pb5ySc is on a quiet road, full 3 1/2 inch system off GT3076 and external plumb back, only one large muffler at rear... ( excuse the crappy footage and Tein coilover old couch sounds lol)

Thanks, I will fire up my PC later and have a proper look at both posts, this laptop is crap :(

Has the car still got the limiter ,180kph set up or over ridden. I had this on the 350GT and as a DD had no trouble with it

Sounds good Mark, well if I could hear it :whistling:

Just some quotes regarding my fuel situation , if I am going to try and get it all working properly I decided I would rather have over kill than run it on the edge.

Been thinking of getting an Aftermarket Industry surge tank with twin walbro 460lph pump mounted in the surge.

It seems the single walbro 460lph pump should flow around 450kw by itself. The issue is the plastic fitting in the fuel hat.(fuel gets pumped from the pump up through the fuel hat to the outside of the fuel tank via the "hat" then through the stock fuel lines to the engine bay.

On the R34 this hat is a bottle neck as the inside diameter of the fitting is around 3.5mm.

Just need to spend some more money :)

Fuel hat can be changed to alloy with a decent fitting in it.

Got a photo of mine.

Using genie turbo mufflers.

Turbo muffler, are they more restrictive than a chamber model.

I see you can also get them with insulation to quieten them down if you want.

The Genie, could not find out much except they put them on bigger 4WD types

Do you have to get these made or is it an off the shelf fitting ?

Your builder supplied mine. Along with the AI install

Edit. Something like this, but not this one

http://www.powerhouseracing.com/p-4597-phr-fuel-hat-for-nissan-240sx-s14-skyline-r33-r34.aspx

  • Like 1

Your builder supplied mine. Along with the AI install

Edit. Something like this, but not this one

http://www.powerhouseracing.com/p-4597-phr-fuel-hat-for-nissan-240sx-s14-skyline-r33-r34.aspx

I think I need a break from going to Sydney after this and will wait and see if they fix the stuff ups properly .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...