Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol dishes only if it was that easy.

Yer I've seen this ad hmmm

....... nice im just concerned about the high mount and whats it tuned for lagging down low crazy power up high. Opened airbox pits wont like.... thinking its been thrashed abit..

This is his second ad i did contact him 2weeks ago as i wanted to see it no pick up calls no email no sms.... just 1 you got to see it in person some magazine wank off bla bla bla copy and paste from his ad...... no sms after that. Made several attempts of contact.

I love the vspec 2 n mspec as there r the only one i would consider.

I may give another go at contacting him in a week or so.

  • Like 1

Manne so what tool did you end up using?

I always find this handy as the straps never work or the metal band crimps.

3d0f91b2cf5f7ba54b23e17c73cf0fd5.jpg

But this guy at a tool shop once showed me this wired tool the looks like long nose pliers but with metal spikes that bite in he said its messy and last resort sorry can't find a pic for that 1

I like the chain wrench

Edited by pol1on1

They've only got 1.1's I don't know how to gap. Unless u go iridium. What gap am I meant to have?

Go 0.8mm

Up to 1.1 may be ok for your car for the time being but will be more prone to missfire and you'll lose nothing by dropping them a bit but everything to gain.

I tap them gently on the side of a hammer and check with feeler gauges.

About 6-10 gentle taps gets me from 0.8 down to 0.6

So considering I don't drive much at all (probably 10,000kms per year) I should just get platinum/copper?

Also, morning all, nice, cold and wet this morning!

I'd never go platinum personally. Copper are cheap and on standard car should do 20-40k km's or more. Iridium might be good for double that

I use coppers (same as skyline plug) in my work car and just changed them last month after 200 000kms so on non turbo they are good for ages

  • Like 1

For those wondering, Ellie said she's tired aha.

I need to re-seal my seal job, as this cold/warm weather created small gaps on it :). I'm also going to gap my spark plugs today and throw them in the car.

Thank you for the translation [emoji28]

You're always tired. Supplements?

Hahahahahaha My day is pretty full on :) , up at 3.15 am and won't be home until 7.45 in the evening or later than that , depends on how busy with the events / meetings. and top up with Daily workout at the gym at least for 1.5 hours :) loved my cardio !

  • Like 1

Hahahahahaha My day is pretty full on :) , up at 3.15 am and won't be home until 7.45 in the evening or later than that , depends on how busy with the events / meetings. and top up with Daily workout at the gym at least for 1.5 hours :) loved my cardio !

Yeah, you're abit crazy with fitness =P I on the other hand get lazy and just forgo my workouts lol

  • Like 1



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...