Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

How are people locking off their ignition advance to set base timing? I've got an inductive pickup timing light with the pickup clipped around the white wire loop at the start of the coil harness (it's at the back near the firewall), but the ECU is constantly varying the timing and it's very difficult to read. How have other people locked it at 15 degrees?

I have tried Conzult's "idle setting" but that doesn't tell me what the timing is set to, and it doesn't seem to be constant. It just seems to adjust the idle speed.

Cheers

DaveB

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459187-setting-timing-on-25det-neo/
Share on other sites

And check the sticker on you bonnet to see what it should be set at. I believe auto and manual base timing is different. And yes unplug TPS and use an old spark plug lead between cyl 1 coilpack and plug.

Well I tried timing from various points and comparing them to the #1 spark plug using an HT-driven timing light, and I can now say for sure that timing off the loop wires shows about 15 degrees more advance than using the #1 spark plug method. I took some pictures if people are interested but I hope this is enough.

Some weirdness I noticed, has anybody ever seen this? With TPS unplugged (thanks owen1r) I loosened all 3 bolts on the CAS sensor, and then rotated until I observed the same timing with the light that the ECU was commanding (in this case 12 degrees). That was fine. But then I would notice that as soon as I tightened just one of the bolts to even finger tight, the timing would change back to like 5 degrees?! The CAS was definitely not rotating, and it would have to rotate a significant amount to make that much difference to the timing. Does anybody know what could be going on there? This is my second CAS too since I replaced it a while ago.

thanks

David

Lots of timing lights (generally the less expensive ones) read double the actual timing from the loop at the back, so if you are seeing 30o you can probably read that as 15o

Interesting to know thanks Duncan. Do you have any suggestion for why it might be changing when I tighten the CAS? I'm a bit worried that the CAS is reading UNDER, and therefore I might have more timing than there should be.

Edited by DaveB

Lots of timing lights (generally the less expensive ones) read double the actual timing from the loop at the back, so if you are seeing 30o you can probably read that as 15o

I don't think it's that simple and I wouldn't like to just guess.

If the gun is picking up the leading edge of the current in the loop wire, the amount of dwell is added to the timing reading. It might look like double, bit that's basically just a fluke. It should really pick up on the falling edge of the loop wire to be accurate.

I would still not trust it, a plug lead between coil and plug is best option.

  • Like 1

I don't think it's that simple and I wouldn't like to just guess.

If the gun is picking up the leading edge of the current in the loop wire, the amount of dwell is added to the timing reading. It might look like double, bit that's basically just a fluke. It should really pick up on the falling edge of the loop wire to be accurate.

I would still not trust it, a plug lead between coil and plug is best option.

I compared both and I couldn't find any correlation.

With the inductive pickup timing light, off this wire:

post-32445-0-35934300-1440639860_thumb.jpg

...I measured about 22 degrees:

post-32445-0-69599100-1440639878_thumb.png

But with an older style timing light, that connects directly to the spark plug (it has a long spring which fitted into the coilpack), it read about 5 degrees!

  • Like 1

Do some maths. I'm sure it would be able to be calculated back to the dwell of the coil.

I seriously can't be bothered looking I to it further!

It's enough to know to not trust/use the loop, especially without checking it to a lead.

Do some maths. I'm sure it would be able to be calculated back to the dwell of the coil.

I seriously can't be bothered looking I to it further!

It's enough to know to not trust/use the loop, especially without checking it to a lead.

Sure. What I meant to say was, it doesn't look easy like 2 x the spark-measured value or something similar.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...