Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Or dispense information to take away from the demonisation of certain substances!

I just find it hilarious jaguars like hallucinogens tbh

Yeah mentioned this to a work colleague, his reaction was 'f&%kwit'.

If your aim is to amuse your readers then I think its funnier the reason why dogs lick their balls.

But I thought you were coming from a more logical,wise,and intelligent viewpoint with all your amazingness, again dogs licking their balls is more logical, wiser, and more intelligent than anything you have posted.

As with any addict all you are doing is trying to use any acquired information to create the illusion of intelligence to somehow try to justify your habit. A common behavior that addicts have, as a means to shy away from their destructive habit's reality.

As mentioned before, if anyone wants to really become intelligent on the topic of illicit drugs then they should they should stop reading bs and go to an ED or rehab centre.

As a soldier once said to me when I asked him a few questions about his service in Vietnam, he said you research and read all the dribble you want, but if you really want to know the truth you have to be there amongst all the shit.

But hey, he was no expert right because he didn't sit on his arse doing 5 min google searches to become an expert of everything.

Stop stroking your ego Trozzle by looking up and posting irrelevant information, the type of information that actually makes people dumber.

Oh, have you had the time to answer those questions yet or are you still avoiding them as you all do?

Funny that.

I am out of here.

Oh one last thing Trozzle,

Have a wonderful, safe and Merry Christmas to you and your loved ones.

  • Like 1

Actually decided to skim through that... The only thing I'm addicted to so far as this subject goes is an addiction to debunking the scientifically unfounded and plainly false claims constantly repeated time and time again as fact by idiots like yourself who refuse to show they have any ACTUAL knowledge on the things they're speaking on.

And again, even if I were simply googling shit to repeat here (which I'm not), that's still leaps and bounds beyond the sourceless ramblings you've pulled out your own ass mate :)

I await your response, even though you've said multiple times you're done.

  • Like 1

Stats don't lie when they cannot be warped.

* 50% of all M.V. accident victims tested this year in NSW, showed traces of amphetamines.

* Amphetamines in the system can only be read (off the swab or in a lab) for up to 48hrs after its most recent dose.

HNY to all...

Stats don't lie when they cannot be warped.

* 50% of all M.V. accident victims tested this year in NSW, showed traces of amphetamines.

* Amphetamines in the system can only be read (off the swab or in a lab) for up to 48hrs after its most recent dose.

HNY to all...

Couldn't that just mean 50 percent of the general population has traces of amphetamines?

Yes it could.

Good point Ben.

Amusing given "traces" wouldn't suggest they were under the influence, and further recently enough in a particular case it was found that if anything the methamphetamine in a driver's system would have contributed positively if anything.

(meth is bad, driving on meth is worse... Before it looks like I'm condoning this shit again somehow)

But people here, including yourself, are arguing with other figures of knowledge on this topic simply by discounting their input (like that of David Nutt I provided earlier, immediately dismissed by those who choose to believe whatever they want).

I've asked plenty of questions - in fact some of you yourself Terry regarding statements made in your original thread - and they're yet to be answered. If I need to study journalism before you'll risk looking a fool, you've already done so.

Stats don't lie when they cannot be warped.

* 50% of all M.V. accident victims tested this year in NSW, showed traces of amphetamines.

* Amphetamines in the system can only be read (off the swab or in a lab) for up to 48hrs after its most recent dose.

HNY to all...

That could simply be

50% of the targeted demographic had trace elements of Amphetamines in their system

I.e they tested 2 people both of whom could have been known drug users, 1 had trace elements the other didnt. so now 50% of the world are druggos

That is how stats work

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
    • Hi.. Just another problem. So maybe you can help. I(my mechanic) done swap from my RB20DE NEO to RB25DET NEO. Everything is OK but we have a boost cut. Coils/Plugs are ok...AFM is ok. ECU is ok. I have Walbro 255 but it "changed" sound few months ago(you can hear it ouside) you did not hear that when it was new(maybe faulty?) Sooo...what now? What can cause this boost cut? It is even when you standing still...
×
×
  • Create New...