Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey peoples, I'll keep it simple

Got a rb25 t67 kinugawa 18psi bp98

Made 350hp at hubs.

Took it to the track and had a drift. I lived my dream.

The car is sitting in the garage and there's a rb30 block next to it.

I've only driven it once it was nice.

I'm gonna put the rb30 in there now cause I like spinning spanners.

What I'm after is less lag and more wheel spin.

It's just for the street now and I want an animal.

I'm looking at Garrett gt3076 .82

I'm not after hp, just spinning tyres.

What about gtx range? Or .63

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461078-rb2530-turbo-choice-again/
Share on other sites

Keep the t67 with a 30 bottom end it will be even more responsive.

I know my rb25 t67 all it does is spin wheels with basic 235 tyres

1 5000 on wheelspin

2 4500

3 4200

Thats jist footflat no clutching t67 are very agressive although i also made another 100 hp at 17 psi 450hp

I would go with something similar to a GTX3582 with a 1.06 housing.. that 3.0L will spool anything with a VCT head.

Look at 2JZ-GTE with VVT-i heads.. it will give you a good idea, those motors will happily spool up a GTX3582 1.06 rear around 4k rpm and produce very linear torque and linear power.

A T67 would be too small.

From what I've read they spool 500rpm earlier on 3l.

So with the setup I have that would be a big enprovment.

Boosting 5000 1st 4500 second and 4200 third is like mine.

I think 3582 on 3l will be too much. I'm not after a drag car with peak power.

The way I'm looking at it is I made 350hp at the wheels with 2.5 and t67. If I were to up th cc to 3l and run a smaller turbo gt3076 .82, I could easily make 350hp but I'll be boosting at 3800 4000 in first. Am I on the rite track?

T67 is restrictive on the turbine side. For a 3L you are better off going for a GT3582 or equivalent, alternatively the 25G comp with TD06H turbine inside 10 CM housing.

Listen to Stao on this one.

I am running a TDO6H-25G 12cm on 30DET for track-only.

Had been running a GT3076 0.87 turbo.

Turbine restriction showed itself when tuning with the GT30, although it was a very sweet combination for road-only use. With Garrett I would go with a GT35 0.82

The TDO6H 12cm provides great linear delivery for track, but some stage I'm interested to slip on a 10cm housing. With that I'd expect 3-500rpm earlier for full boost, say 2900rpm for 17psi. The 12cm housing for road-only might not be the ideal match if you need mumbo in the 2000-3000rpm range. 12cm is more than adequate for response across 3500-7000 on track though.

For the money would also look closely at a BW 7670 especially if finances don't stretch to a proper split pulse with twin gates, fancy manifold etc.

My t67 comes on at 4100 in 4th on a 25 but makes peek power at 7800 at a flat 17 across the board .

My understanding was that it would come on around 3600 on 30 and behave well on the st.

This kinda annoys me as i had planned to use this settup eg put a 30 bottom end on.

Michelomore made 400 on a 2530 with a gtx3076 .8 i beleive

It's all application dependent for what is best suited.

^^ Fully agree the GT3582 is more suited to the 3 litre than a GT30. Those 1.06 housings aren't so easy to acquire, and the bulkier housing impinges into the centre bearing area making hookup to oil/water lines more difficult.

Cheapest option by far is to run the existing TD06SDL2-25G (aka T67 25G)and see if he likes it. Dimensions suggest broadly similar capabilities to a GTX3076.

30DET with stock cams, VCT working, stock inlet manifold etc will belt out some decent mid range torque but tend to peak around/just under 6000rpm. Bigger turbine does not automatically equate to peaky or laggy performance. But it can extend the usable upper rpm without making it gutless right down low. That's why the TDO6H 10cm turbine spec was suggested. I would back it as a very good all rounder, with the 12cm more suited to track. There's enough in-car video in my 33 build thread to demonstrate that unit as progressive, not focused on peak power.

350rwhp was a figure mentioned earlier. If the preference is for Kinugawa product and that sort of hp and very quick/early spool to fry rubber, try a TDO6SL2-20G. Not big $$ to play around and trial. I reckon it would fall over with engine rpm, maybe 5500. I'd suggest similar in sizing and characteristics to a GT3071.

The BW 7670 shouldn't be ignored. Robust, priced competitively, and different specs available to tailor it to application.

Edited by Dale FZ1

The t67 25g seemes to preform between the 3076 and the 3582.

Really depend on were he wants the power band sounds like down low for the street

not sure if you noticed the above dyno graph I posted of a GTX3582 on a 3.0L 2JZ

but it's all in at 3500rpm with 25psi and look at the power delivery, also if you were to run a little less boost it would come on even earlier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...