Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maxx, I think the the Toyo should be fine on track.

hey if you guys are keen for a group buy of bridgestone re55, I can organise some good price for ya.  Just let me know :/

is the group buy still available????

i have a few new stuff coming very soon and would like to take it for hill climb

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi maxx :hello:

Regency bridgestone is still in the "tender" for sport tyres

if and when they win I can get even cheaper prices

I am still waiting for this too as my 18" rears are getting worn.

If you are in a rush let me know too and i see what I can do.

Hi maxx :hello:

Regency bridgestone is still in the "tender" for sport tyres

if and when they win I can get even cheaper prices

I am still waiting for this too as my 18" rears are getting worn.

If you are in a rush let me know too and i see what I can do.

Like to be in for some tyres as well.

Thanks for the kind humour Andy :P

I would love to catch up with you guys again. I couldn't attend the past few cruises because everytime there was a cruise, I had to work or something else :(

Car has been back on the road for a few months now.

Current power is 249.9rwkw but it's not that fast. I think I will switch to a turbo and try to do a 12.74sec quarter mile run then I will be happy ;)

Let me know when you go on the next cruise Andy, I will try to make it.

bloody hell - at 250rwkw that thing would be a weapon!!! I think you are way too modest mate!

I am serious Andy. It doesn't feel that fast due to the linear boost build up of the sc :D I need more boost and seriously thinking about switching to a turbo.

My drive train (gear box, diff, driveshafts and CV joints) will be the next weakest links. If I can do 12.7 without breaking anything with a turbo, I will be happy mate :)

Hate to break it to you, but after a while 300rwkW doesn't feel that fast, then 350rwkW doesn't feel that fast... (haven't driven anything more powerful than that)

The fastest feeling car I have ever driven was a 200rwkW VL Turbo. It had no traction and the boost came in like a sledgehammer. It was very silly and lots of fun. Depends what you want I guess.

So does that mean anyone is interested? There is a PI weekend on the 13th and 14th, im coming back to Melb Fri 12th so may just do the PI weekend instead.

But if ppl are keen for the 6th then i may be able to convince the boss to give me Friday off for the drive over:)

  • 9 months later...

Back from the dead...anyone keen to do a practice day on 1st October?

Never got the chance with work beign work and my car having problems to make it to the track when i was last over...time to set things right...lol, as long as im not the only one going

I think I will switch to a turbo

9krpm, so you aint running a turbo atm but a supercharger of some sort (eaton etc)? Duy's supercharged s2k is still putting about the same figures yours is currently at but he told me your running a turbocharger. Anyways, is your drivetrain/other components of the honda holding together with that figure resonable well?

duc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...