Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I guess this is the time old tale and i have been looking into a whole heap of different suspension packages for my R34 and i seem to be coming up with some wildly different setups.

I have noticed that the likes of MCA and BC seem to be going for the hard spring, soft ARB approach and then bilstein, Supashock are going for a softer spring firmer ARB. Obviously valving for each package is going to be different but dont really want to get into the nitty gritty of that (just yet).

I personally am going for the softer spring approach. In my opinion this gives more weight transfer F&R but then keeping roll seperate and having the bar do that for you. With the firmer spring i wouldnt think that you would get that initial squat/bite plus you are making your shock controll 2 aspects your F&R weight transfer and the roll.

What are your opinions? Like i said im just about ready to go down the path of shocks

There are compromises and trade off each way. I think both approaches are faulty.

Stiff springs mean that the suspension is tuned for high speed bumps. It becomes much less pleasant at lower speeds. Also, particularly only feels good on smooth surfaces. The soft bars on that approach at least maintain as much independence from side to side, meaning that bumps that affect just one wheel will not unsettle the other side so much.

Soft springs + hard bars brings on another problem. The bars will resist a lot of roll, yes, but the springs are now not tuned for high speed bump inputs. You also lose a lot of side-side independence. This can be a horrible compromise.

The best approach is to go medium on each. But even that so much depends on the surfaces the car is going to be used on and the usage it will be put to. Street car? Go sensible, especially on Australian roads. Lots of bumps. Really stiff springs suck in that usage model. Track car? Smooth tracks only? Stiff as buggery and then add some more.

There is no such thing as one set up that works everywhere. That is why proper race teams have setups for every different track!

  • Like 1

So just to chuck in another semi-related question - why does the v-spec have 4kg/mm front, 5kg rear spring rates, compared to say your "normal" MCA or other setup for a GTR, which would be biased the other way?

Assuming Nissan did this to get the car to turn (less understeer). Have also read that the damping on a v spec is biased soft on compression in rear, harder at front, to change the balance back a bit.

Anyway would like to hear any thoughts on the difference in spring rate front to rear, in a 4wd. I have a ENR34 sedan with a turbo stag motor and all stock R34 gtr suspension components at the moment, so 3.2kg/mm front and rear.

So just to chuck in another semi-related question - why does the v-spec have 4kg/mm front, 5kg rear spring rates, compared to say your "normal" MCA or other setup for a GTR, which would be biased the other way?

Assuming Nissan did this to get the car to turn (less understeer). Have also read that the damping on a v spec is biased soft on compression in rear, harder at front, to change the balance back a bit.

Anyway would like to hear any thoughts on the difference in spring rate front to rear, in a 4wd. I have a ENR34 sedan with a turbo stag motor and all stock R34 gtr suspension components at the moment, so 3.2kg/mm front and rear.

I guess they have the active dff so perhaps they try to help dial out understeer by running a higher rear spring rate

I used to grab bits off a V8 Supercar guy and when he was at Kmart Racing he told me there was a big difference to how Rick Kelly and Greg Murphy set up their cars. If memory serves me correctly Murphy loved as much bar as they could throw at the car whilst Kelly liked more spring.

I ran big bars at one point in time and whilst the car was generally about as quick as it was with the other smaller bars I have run it did handle and feel very different. Not sure porpoising is the ride word but it seemed to feel as though it crabbed around fast corners..just felt odd. With smaller bars it just feels like the car handles what I would say is more natural

Russman now runs my old mega bars in his Time Attack GTSt and its friggin quick for a basic car so they obviously work well with the Tein RS setup he runs. But for me I ended up with my ARC bars that generally felt the same at the off the shelf Whiteline offering but are larger diam and hollow so lighter but still adjustable in the rear.

Potentially the v-spec may have also had different rear diffuser and wing combo than normal GTR?

Yes for R34. However R33 v spec had same spring rates and no diffuser (but you could put a lot of wing on the rear from what i have seen).

Forget aero it is a non event on any road car.

You usually run a soft rear spring for traction. If your GTR has a properly functioning attesa system (Which can exclude 32's) you won't struggle for traction and can then use the front/rear springs to alleviate under steer which all gtr's do in spades. SO who's right - MCA or Nismo? IMHO Nismo by a long way. WHich doesn't mean I wouldn't ask MCA what a decent Spring rate would do to their shock setup.

Bar choice comes down to chucking the hardest you can find at it - I bought mine a long while ago so am no longer sure what is still available. Hard springs with soft bars leaves you with wheel hiking ugliness like Mark Skaife circa 1995 and generally a car that feels unsettled in the corners. Running too hard sway bars reduces your grip and the suspensions independence so isn't to be recommended either. FWIW I run 5.5kg/mm front, 5 rear with a Cusco rear bar and a whiteline front on soft with heaps of front -Ve camber. Balance changes with tyre age from mildly tails (and quicker) on new to under steer on old. This on a 32 GTR.

  • Like 1

in my discussion with MCA yes, he said runs stock/soft swaybars and did not seem keen on using a stiffer swaybar in most applications. While I also have stiffer and adjustable swaybars myself, I prefer a stiffer spring to control the majority of body roll - in fact recently had first a front swaybar link, then a swaybar bracket break, and the subsequent loss of working front swaybar has only mildly affected the handling, and mostly in a stability sense rather than any affect on controlling body roll. To some degree I find left and right being able to operate independently of each other rather than being linked by the swaybar to be better, although not to the extent I will not be linking it up again.

Overall though when I first fitted stiffer swaybars on stock springs the handling improved but not to the same extent as moving to a stiffer spring, and of the choice between the 2 I'd say stiffer spring (relevant to the given application) is far more beneficial any day, with the ideal result being the right balance of both of course.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry, just assumed that talk of coloured pads meant EBC red/green/yellow/shit stuff. I don't know the DBA pads, but it's a reasonable bet that they will be OK. DBA make good stuff generally. Those 4000 series rotors I linked to are very good. I may well replace the RDA rotors I have with those when required.
    • The average previous owner for these cars were basically S-chassis owners in the US. Teenagers or teenager-adjacent. I often tell people that neglect is easier to fix than something that was actively "repaired" by previous owners.
    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
×
×
  • Create New...