Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Intermittent Performance

34R, -9s, e85, haltech etc etc. Approx 350rwkw at 24 or so psi. 

Have recently fixed 2 boost leaks (front turbo to TT pipe and IAT sensor on back of plazmaman cooler) but am finding that even after this the "punch" is intermittent, sometimes it's there/good, sometimes it's lacking that extra kick at WOT. 

Using onboard haltech map sensor so it stops telling me anything useful after 21psi. No faults being thrown, car has wideband and oil pressure kit also. 

I thought it might be intake air temps (pods with an enclosure), as it's been warmer here, but I've had the car feel great and not so great on 27 deg intake temps in the same driving session. 

Car is going in soon for cams and valve springs, but if there's anything else I can check, I'm all ears. I've boost leak tested the entire intake tract up to 40psi using a leak down tester. 

The difference feels like when I went from airbox and 21psi to pods, better cooler, and 24psi, which was about a 20kw/100Nm gain. 

What power are stock GTR bov's good for? Any point in me disconnecting the Mac solenoid for a test? 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/469686-intermittent-performance/
Share on other sites

What condition is your electrical system e.g. Alternator output as RB's can suffer voltage drop at mid to high rpm's

type of plugs can make a difference some are better than others if it is a voltage drop.

Check out ADVANCE alternators 150amp as a solution on www.rhdjapan.com they are about $950.00 to $980.00 plus freight.

where does your cold air induction feed from e.g. bonnet, front bar, behind headlight, or intake catch above radiator?

Heat shield between pod filters and engine can help create a cool zone for air pick up.

Was holding off as the upcoming cam install meant I'd likely need less boost for my goal (500rwhp or so).

Can bovs be intermittent​? Am i just clutching at straws there?

Disconnecting boost control solenoid not gonna tell me much is it, other than actuators are fine to standard pressure (1 bar I think)

When we did the pods/cooler it was happier to make more boost so was tuned a few pound beyond the onboard map limit.

Similar to what race pace used to do when tuning beyond max flow of the standard AFMs.

Done on the dyno of course.

Anyway can get a sensor, not a big deal if seeing max boost is the absolute first step.





Similar to what race pace used to do when tuning beyond max flow of the standard AFMs.



So isn't this based on an extrapolation of the tune at the max flow of the AFMs assuming that components are the same and behave the same (linearly)?

If you have had boost leaks and turned on Antilag for a while then things aren't the same / behaving the same?

Is a higher PSI MAP sensor equivalent to using Nismo AFMs (in this regard)?

Yep, It was tuned on the dyno at 24psi, on his gauge and using my onboard wideband as a cross reference.

 

The anti lag is just a couple of tick boxes and were not turned on when it was tuned, it's also off now so it's not a factor.

 

Wouldn't matter even if it was on as the launch control has nothing to do with what we're discussing here (wot performance) and the rally anti lag only fires between shifts after you lift off the throttle.

 

What I'm talking about is how much power it's making/how hard you get pushed back into your seat, during full throttle stints.

 

That doesn't feel consistent currently, but i cant figure out what the variables are.

 

I thought it might have been purely IAT, as i have pods (shielded yes with cold feed from headlight and inner guard, but still not as well shielded as stock airbox) but the other night out and about for a big Chrysler show locally it was hit and miss with similar air temps.

 

 

16 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Approx 350rwkw at 24 or so psi. 

Have recently fixed 2 boost leaks.

Using onboard haltech map sensor so it stops telling me anything useful after 21psi. 

11 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Disconnecting boost control solenoid not gonna tell me much is it, other than actuators are fine to standard pressure (1 bar I think)

OK.  I've taken a deep breath before saying anything :)

Questions:

1) Is the Haltech controlling boost, or do you have a separate electronic boost control driving the solenoid which CAN see past 21psi?

2) Did you tuner at all oppose this idea of tuning past the MAP sensor's visibility?

3) Did you get the tune looked at after fixing the boost leaks?

 

Edited by Lithium

lol, deep breathes :D

 

1) Yes. 
2) He said it's best to have the 3 bar sensor but that we can tune past it and see how it goes, I guess this is part of the answer. 
3) No, but I'm certain the car would have only had the IAT sensor leak (small), if at all, as the response and power both on and off the dyno after the tune was solid. I only started checking for leaks as I felt the difference in the car. The big leak was the gasket between front turbo and TT pipe connection. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • CTIS (Central Tire Inflation System) has existed since the 80's. I'm looking into buying a Hummer H1 and they generally included it. 
    • My idle is set at 950rpm though - Moving the timing around 20 degrees is not really what I'd call a calm idle. That said... neither is chop, by definition. The LS ECU likes to adjust timing to hold idle as opposed to air. It'd work, but generally speaking there'd be a discrepancy in the base idle and the IACV would want to move the timing around anyway to maintain said idle. I think I'm just going to keep the timing steady anyway. Preserve my engine mounts.  My aircon is now officially regassed. As the guy was reversing I noticed my reverse lights do not operate, along with my reverse cam. This is a bit distressing, because 100% of guides talk about which wire to connect to backup cams as "the goes with the [other color] wire". Often when doing conversions. Unfortunately the R34 colour wires aren't documented Unfortunately I had a T56 Magnum gearbox with it's reverse switch, which also isn't documented. Unfortunately there's definitely not documentation for people with both of these in the one car. Unfortunately I forgot. After many hours of this, I have a reverse cam and reverse lights again. The wire going through the trans tunnel to the reverse switch had broken. Upon inspection, it looks like this one wire had about 7 spade terminals and extensions in it.. for reasons I cannot possibly comprehend. I also spent the 750 hours required to clean up the wiring behind my head unit which now looks like this: This is a monumental improvement relative to what used to be there WRT triple gauges, head unit, traction control, wideband controller, and whatever the f**k OEM stuff still exists there in various states of connectivity/needed. Next step is to check in at the Exhaust shop to see/confirm how much clearance I have, to decide what mid mufflers or 'resonators' (which are just straight through, narrower mufflers) I can add and hopefully cut out a lot of exhaust leaks, pinhole, v-band or otherwise. But first step will be to 'take a look' before the next step.
    • Fark the AFM card and Nistune, Haltech Nexus S3, DBW, cruise control, flex fuel, dis dat.  
    • It's most likely the bolt/bush where the cover bolts back wore and allowed cover to move forward.
    • Still haven't put the injectors and R35 AFM in so we can tune the bloody thing for the HG highflow it got mid last year! I think I can forecast the upgrade path to a bigger twin scroll, external gate, Haltech, flex setup, Samsonas, dis dat, etc will be .... a while away!
×
×
  • Create New...