Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Most likely one of the thousands of posts about idle problems with an RB engine. So, my r34 has been running like a dream. I've owned it for about 4 months, and never had a single problem. Put in a boost controller myself about 2 months ago, never had a problem. In the last week, my car has decided to drop to 500RPM when warm, and at a complete stop, and in the last day, it's done the same thing, but the idle was very rough and a bit up and down. Here's a video of my car idling, ignore the engine as for some reason on camera it comes out to be extremely loud, but IRL is a lot quieter for some reason. I just wanted you to focus on the exhaust pattern, as that's what I'm referring to when I say rough idle. This morning when I cold started it, it did the rough idle thing, dropped to 500RPM, and went rough, rough rough and then stalled for the first time ever, started it up 2 seconds later and was all good, started fine no worries. I took of the cam cover to check the timing belt, but it looks like it's in very good condition. No tears or anything. Here's the video: R34 idle Problems

 

I'm in need of some feedback if possible, just some recommendations on what I should look to fix, maybe if someone has experience the same problem I'm having. Cheers heaps guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475134-r34-gtt-idle-problem/
Share on other sites

It's misfiring.  Could be recent change in fuel composition (end of winter mix, start of summer mix) depending on where you are.  Could be dirty plug(s).  Could be dirty AFM.

The video showed it idling at ~1000rpm.  I assume it was still warming up.  If it's settling to 500 rpm (where it should be aiming for 650rpm) then that could be because of the miss, or it could be because the IACV is clogged enough to stop it controlling.  The IACV incorporates a wax pellet cold start valve that gives you your cold engine high revs but it will close as the coolant warms and if the IACV can't control with the stepper motor then you can lose idle revs.  I had to clean mine recently because of this.  Was dropping to (nice) idle of 400rpm.  Not satisfactory for driving though, as it can and will stall.

Cheers heaps GTS boy, i did actually experience misfiring about a week or 2, took out 1 of the coils looked fine (was late and had to get somewhere), so I just put it all back together after checking 1. I was driving to 80km/hr and was in 2nd at about 5k RPM, car made what I can describe as a 2step firing noise, then kept going. That happened twice but under the same circumstances, never had a problem since. I checked the consult port for errors, and got code 55 which is 'no malfunction', so that's all clear. Just bought some throttle body cleaner, will get to all the air control valves when I get home. Really appreciate the help, and will keep this thread updated just in case anyone else has the same problem

Cheers heaps GTS boy, i did actually experience misfiring about a week or 2, took out 1 of the coils looked fine (was late and had to get somewhere), so I just put it all back together after checking 1. I was driving to 80km/hr and was in 2nd at about 5k RPM, car made what I can describe as a 2step firing noise, then kept going. That happened twice but under the same circumstances, never had a problem since. I checked the consult port for errors, and got code 55 which is 'no malfunction', so that's all clear. Just bought some throttle body cleaner, will get to all the air control valves when I get home. Really appreciate the help, and will keep this thread updated just in case anyone else has the same problem.

Also, just driving my car now, I'm experiencing really strong stutter when I'm upshifting, feels like turbo lag but turbo is hitting boost fine on the stock gauge. I'd explain it as stuttering but it's more of a hesitation, I'm shifting at about 5k, and it takes a good second to actually tourqe up again, and keep powering, hence why it feels like turbo lag, but yeah hitting high PSI fine

Here's an update: so I've changed the spark plugs, used electric dialect on all coil packs and cleaned all of them. It must be just a faulty coil pack. I've also cleaned the AFM sensor with some contact cleaner. Literally no change in performance. This must narrow it down to be the coils. I'm looking to get some spitfire coil packs, might as well go all out as I'll be adding heavy mods soon.

  • 1 year later...

I know that it’s been two years, but did you ever find out the problem, I am having the same in my 1999 R34 RB25DE NEO, have replaced the coilpacks and harness and spark plugs, have checked my AFM, and no change have put some injector cleaner in and there was a slight improvement but it’s still idling low and rough 

  • 4 years later...
On 10/12/2018 at 5:56 PM, GTSBoy said:

It's misfiring.  Could be recent change in fuel composition (end of winter mix, start of summer mix) depending on where you are.  Could be dirty plug(s).  Could be dirty AFM.

The video showed it idling at ~1000rpm.  I assume it was still warming up.  If it's settling to 500 rpm (where it should be aiming for 650rpm) then that could be because of the miss, or it could be because the IACV is clogged enough to stop it controlling.  The IACV incorporates a wax pellet cold start valve that gives you your cold engine high revs but it will close as the coolant warms and if the IACV can't control with the stepper motor then you can lose idle revs.  I had to clean mine recently because of this.  Was dropping to (nice) idle of 400rpm.  Not satisfactory for driving though, as it can and will stall.

Is the 650rpm idle on the rb25det neo for stock cars only? I've never had my car before and after tuning it to idle at 650rpm when cold. Always idle's cold around 1100rpm, and then drops to about 900-950rpm. I've heard the r33 gtst's idle there. 

Edited by silviaz
2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Unless you have big cams, there is no reason for an RB to idle at any more than the stock 650. No, it is not 850, 950, or anything else. It is 650.

In fact, it might even be 550. I just opened an arbitrary stock Neo file in Nistune, and this is what I see

image.png

Oh ok, so looks I should be resolving this? I was thinking of cleaning the iacv, and maf for a start and checking for any loose hoses. Already did a boost leak/smoke test and was all in the clear.

I'm suprised the tuner didn't say anything.

4 hours ago, silviaz said:

Oh ok, so looks I should be resolving this? I was thinking of cleaning the iacv, and maf for a start and checking for any loose hoses. Already did a boost leak/smoke test and was all in the clear.

I'm suprised the tuner didn't say anything.

If it's been tuned idle rpm can be changed.

4 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

If it's been tuned idle rpm can be changed.

Yep. Saw that on the image above but, wonder if it makes more sense to clean out the iacv because let's say in theory mine is dirty and if I clean it the rpm will drop. If I first go to my tuner to drop the rpm and then go to clean my iacv won't it drop further or is the rpm a fixed number?

What ECU is on your car @silviaz?

You can just change the idle target table yourself and the IACV duty cycle. Noting that if you play around with the screw you'll also need to revisit the idle base duty table as you will end up offsetting the lot.

Another reason why DBW is superior, there's less mucking about.

10 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

What ECU is on your car @silviaz?

You can just change the idle target table yourself and the IACV duty cycle. Noting that if you play around with the screw you'll also need to revisit the idle base duty table as you will end up offsetting the lot.

Another reason why DBW is superior, there's less mucking about.

Apexi, though I'm not comfortable with setting the idle, knowing me I'll f**k it up lol.

59 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Yep. Saw that on the image above but, wonder if it makes more sense to clean out the iacv because let's say in theory mine is dirty and if I clean it the rpm will drop. If I first go to my tuner to drop the rpm and then go to clean my iacv won't it drop further or is the rpm a fixed number?

The RPM is just a target, the ECU will adjust things to try and hit that target but it's by no means guaranteed. If the IACV duty cycle is 0 or something like that and it's actually closing up fully then the idle is as low as it can physically go without reducing ignition timing. The problem can be something like the cold start valve in the IACV not closing fully, worn throttle shaft seals, torn rubber diaphragm in the brake booster allowing unmetered air, etc. 

  • Thanks 1
10 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

The RPM is just a target, the ECU will adjust things to try and hit that target but it's by no means guaranteed. If the IACV duty cycle is 0 or something like that and it's actually closing up fully then the idle is as low as it can physically go without reducing ignition timing. The problem can be something like the cold start valve in the IACV not closing fully, worn throttle shaft seals, torn rubber diaphragm in the brake booster allowing unmetered air, etc. 

Ah right that makes sense.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...