Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, drifter17a said:

update, pcv removed and redone the fittings and situation is considerably better with minimal oil

 

i bought a second 2 liter catch can

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Universal-2-Litre-Oil-Catch-Can-Tank-Reservoir-with-Billet-Aluminium-Cap-Black/222719067847?hash=item33db1746c7:g:-lEAAOSwyXNaEqW1

 

i have a moshimoto 3 port so a waste to through it away so how i am planning to do it is 2 input from rocker to ins on the moshimoto then output from moshimoto to the newely bought 2 liter can and then output from that can to air .

 

so messiness should be minimised.

 

has anyone here got two catch cans or see an issue with such setup ?

Good plan. I have at one point run 2 catch cans until I worked out a better set up.  Some of the Japanese race cars used to run an air oil separator as well as a catch can although a modern air oil separator can make the catch can superfluous (at a much greater cost). But final output should be to the intake not to atmosphere.

Since i have blocked pcv, there is clouds of white smoke on idle and when rev stationary

 

tuner said i could block it and i did but hell a lot of white smoke, anyone?

 

it is not there when engine is reved or at least minimal

 

can it be signs of gasket going?

12 hours ago, drifter17a said:

update, pcv removed and redone the fittings and situation is considerably better with minimal oil

 

i bought a second 2 liter catch can

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Universal-2-Litre-Oil-Catch-Can-Tank-Reservoir-with-Billet-Aluminium-Cap-Black/222719067847?hash=item33db1746c7:g:-lEAAOSwyXNaEqW1

 

i have a moshimoto 3 port so a waste to through it away so how i am planning to do it is 2 input from rocker to ins on the moshimoto then output from moshimoto to the newely bought 2 liter can and then output from that can to air .

 

so messiness should be minimised.

 

has anyone here got two catch cans or see an issue with such setup ?

How is the baffling inside that puppy?

5 minutes ago, drifter17a said:

Inaide the carch can?

Yes mate, inside.

There may be witness markes on the outside from internal welds.

Or, at the very least, internal piping at the "in" which stops it just going straight "out".

If it's hollow it won't do alot, better than nothing I suppose.

Your Mishimoto can has a filter and a baffle I believe to strip out the oil in the air.

I can see oil on the filter on out section confirming oilmis flowinh from out port 

 

it is baffelled and looka like the one below

 

https://www.mishimoto.co.uk/compact-baffled-oil-catch-can-3-port-12338.html

 

i am highly suspicious it isndue to the pcv block off as it started as soon as i blocked that port but why i don’t know

Hi 

 

fixed the cloud of white smoke by plugging pcv back

when unplugged, i noticed lots of fume coming out from breather rocker cover and catch can filter

 

it is one way and only sees vacumme and shuts on boost

 

me thinking what is it that is causing significant pressure build up in the crank

 

here is pic of my setup

Two rocker cover to catch can and then breathe to air

 

after plugging pcv back, i still see smoke and white i think but a lot less which is coming on when i come off the throttle

what the hell is going on, i am not sure

 

can faulty turbo seals pressurise the crank?

9ECC1DC7-027E-4F2A-8BB8-18E5ED77A831.jpeg

870BFC79-E97F-4022-AF1E-C49CE16CD138.jpeg

45 minutes ago, drifter17a said:

Hi 

 

fixed the cloud of white smoke by plugging pcv back

when unplugged, i noticed lots of fume coming out from breather rocker cover and catch can filter

 

it is one way and only sees vacumme and shuts on boost

 

me thinking what is it that is causing significant pressure build up in the crank

 

here is pic of my setup

Two rocker cover to catch can and then breathe to air

 

after plugging pcv back, i still see smoke and white i think but a lot less which is coming on when i come off the throttle

what the hell is going on, i am not sure

 

can faulty turbo seals pressurise the crank?

9ECC1DC7-027E-4F2A-8BB8-18E5ED77A831.jpeg

870BFC79-E97F-4022-AF1E-C49CE16CD138.jpeg

That filter near the turbo is concerning. That would be allowing unmetered air into the engine, leaning it out. It really should be blocked.

  • Like 2

it is using map not maf so air is measured from vacumme side.

maf has been removed and replaced with 4 bar link map sensor which can be seen behind the break lines as it is bolted to the panel

i am really not sure of what is going on as i now don't have any smoke like before nor on boost 

it does however sometime comes on when I let the throttle go / come off it after boost but not during boost and it seems to be blue I think which people say it indicate turbo seal issues but my turbo has been rebuilt 200 miles ago!

 

then I am not sure why I have so much fume from pcv when lot of people block it. if i block it my car runs like a tractor as there is tons and tons of white smoke? 

it seems it needs the vacumme to suck it in and burn it

I think..

To much vacum to the motor!

Pcv or vacum breather setup. As you now see.

Is that filter on the inlet side of the turbo?
It looks like its on the boost feed nipple to the actuator wich is on the turbo outlet side and would cause a giant boost leak.

Where is the waste gate feed active nipple ?

6 hours ago, drifter17a said:

yes it is on intake side replacing the return of the rocker cover to engine .

rather than leaving it as it is, i did put a filter on it .

waste gate is feeding from standard place which is on intake pipe ( stock rb25)

 

You get away with that with a map ecu, but it is better to block it rather than filter there

 

Planning to and have bought end cap waiting for it to arrive

 

however that isn’t causing the issue i am seeing

 

what I have seems to be lots of fume/ gas from pcv 

i think if i control it then I will stop seeing the smoke . I have bought a seperate catch can to run it in closed loop( pcv to catch can in and catch can out to inlet manifold)

 

i noticed when pcv was blocked , car was a lot torquier and more responsive. 

 

For people with a bit more mechanical knowledge, why would you ser lots of fume and maybe less of oil?

 

have a look at this

The guy has installed a secondary pcv so engine breathes. It seems to me he has drilled a hole and installed the pcv, i guess that is something to try but bot sure on what area of the rocker or even if it is needed as i have seen 500-600 hp cars with standard breather/ pcv setup

 

Edited by drifter17a
11 hours ago, Slap said:

I think..

To much vacum to the motor!

Pcv or vacum breather setup. As you now see.

Is that filter on the inlet side of the turbo?
It looks like its on the boost feed nipple to the actuator wich is on the turbo outlet side and would cause a giant boost leak.

Where is the waste gate feed active nipple ?

it cant be too much vacuum to the motor because for one, the catch can is vented to atmosphere. 

if you have a lot of blowby that is as sign of engine condition. a motor cant pull so much vaccum that it pulls oil mist out of the rockers on its own, its blown up and out by the blow by. 

an engine with a fair bit of blowby isnt ideal, but with a decent large catch can can be managed. 

Yes it can be.
He didnt have a breather at first and blocked the pvc.
And yes he had corrected it before i even said.

Are you triping ben?
The smoke was because the oil got sucked.
Not because it was blown out or it would had have shitter compression than a perfectly stable one across em all.
Aswell as he added the breather and it stopped.

Ya see that valve ya love to think works perfect all the time does not and it still allows some boost leakage that also can help reduce the engines vacum when so. Not its intention as its actualy the opposite. But during boost transition it can buger up and even if it sealed for boost , when open OFF BOOST will have a vacum speed far less than and a more stable flow rate than a setup that rips only to the turbo as oil surge being eaten seems to coincide with a spool up surge not so much off boost or at high boost in this instance.
I dont believe its HIS blow by.....maybe for others.
Seeing as he added a breather to the can and it stoped the issue.

it cant be too much vacuum to the motor because for one, the catch can is vented to atmosphere. 
if you have a lot of blowby that is as sign of engine condition. a motor cant pull so much vaccum that it pulls oil mist out of the rockers on its own, its blown up and out by the blow by. 
an engine with a fair bit of blowby isnt ideal, but with a decent large catch can can be managed. 

I've read that twice and can't make sense of it..

16 minutes ago, Slap said:

Yes it can be.
He didnt have a breather at first and blocked the pvc.
And yes he had corrected it before i even said.

Are you triping ben?
The smoke was because the oil got sucked.
Not because it was blown out or it would had have shitter compression than a perfectly stable one across em all.
Aswell as he added the breather and it stopped.

Ya see that valve ya love to think works perfect all the time does not and it still allows some boost leakage that also can help reduce the engines vacum when so. Not its intention as its actualy the opposite. But during boost transition it can buger up and even if it sealed for boost , when open OFF BOOST will have a vacum speed far less than and a more stable flow rate than a setup that rips only to the turbo as oil surge being eaten seems to coincide with a spool up surge not so much off boost or at high boost in this instance.
I dont believe its HIS blow by.....maybe for others.
Seeing as he added a breather to the can and it stoped the issue.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...