Jump to content
SAU Community

Block pcv after catch can install


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, djr81 said:

Sorry to go off topic but can anyone confirm the pcv thread size and type?

http://www.kudosmotorsports.com/catalog/valve-suit-nissan-200sx-skyline-gts25-rb25de-sr20det-p-1479.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminiscing about RB's

 

I accidentally kinked a the head vents once to my can, lots, and I mean lots, of white smoke.

 

Maybe the motor is breathing that heavy that it is "pressurizing" the engine because the little outlet at the filter is causing a restriction, maybe, maybe not.

I would try and strip as much oil, via a good AOS system and plumb it back to the intake to "create a vacuum" senario thingamajig in the sump.

Plus "notracecar" so "notemmisionsdefect".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little update:

 

i have 3 catch cans now as follow

 

one 3 port 60ml baffeled and filtered which has rocker going to it on input and output goes to another catch can which is 2 liters .

2 liters breath to air and it is not baffeled or filtered

 

third catch can is pcv in and out to manifold

 

smoke has stopped and car feels much stronger, touch wood

 

would you put wool wire in the 2 liter one to help with filtering?

 

no smell no nothing and well happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, drifter17a said:

Little update:

 

i have 3 catch cans now as follow

 

one 3 port 60ml baffeled and filtered which has rocker going to it on input and output goes to another catch can which is 2 liters .

2 liters breath to air and it is not baffeled or filtered

 

third catch can is pcv in and out to manifold

 

smoke has stopped and car feels much stronger, touch wood

 

would you put wool wire in the 2 liter one to help with filtering?

 

no smell no nothing and well happy

Only if you use stainless as steel will disintegrate after a while.

If ports are not marked they are presumably all the same.

Its a pity the baffled and filtered on is so small as I would consider 2L a minimum size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KiwiRS4T said:

Only if you use stainless as steel will disintegrate after a while.

If ports are not marked they are presumably all the same.

Its a pity the baffled and filtered on is so small as I would consider 2L a minimum size.

I use the stainless coarse pot scourers. I wouldn't think rust would be an issue though as it is going to get coated in an oil mist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Touch wood nothing so far

 

the pipe that came with moshimoto was cheap as it looked like a water hose and after little drive it heated up and car was smoking like hell

 

i was so annoyed until i realised that was the culprit

 

put a stainless steel braided and good now

 

only issue is the pcv valve is not fully inside the rubber gourmet and if hose is pulled or moved it moves out a little bit and that too me creates boost leak under boost as boost from manifold escaps

 

can i put black silicon on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, drifter17a said:

only issue is the pcv valve is not fully inside the rubber gourmet 

3 hours ago, drifter17a said:

 

You buy a new grommet. They are the same as many other cars, take yours to a car parts shop of your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems a bit excessive to me.
Any oil leaks?

Only 2 ways it disapeers.

Burning (multiple cause possibilty) or leaked (seals , gaskets, filter)

Motors always burn some but when its usualy in excess can be from but not limited to ...oil passing the rings (wear , wrong gap, worn ringlands) , intake taking in oil (breather setup & pcv from blow by) , head gasket leak (doughtful) , turbo seals.

Personaly if it was 200ml per 1000miles id be thinking its fine but others may say different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That much oil burning is not normal. You're at the point of throwing it away. Stop modding it.

 

Check intercooler for oil. Do a compression test. Check the whole engine for leaks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Slap said:

Seems a bit excessive to me.
Any oil leaks?

Only 2 ways it disapeers.

Burning (multiple cause possibilty) or leaked (seals , gaskets, filter)

Motors always burn some but when its usualy in excess can be from but not limited to ...oil passing the rings (wear , wrong gap, worn ringlands) , intake taking in oil (breather setup & pcv from blow by) , head gasket leak (doughtful) , turbo seals.

Personaly if it was 200ml per 1000miles id be thinking its fine but others may say different.

a bit excessive? 1ml of oil per 1mile of driving....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies for getting into this thread so late.

Firstly, would everyone please stop referring to this device as a "catch can", it is an "oil-air separator".

Secondly, the apparent installation is a bit iffy. Surely a simpler method:

1. Remove hose running from Ex rocker cover down to the turbo.

2. Leave hose connecting In rocker cover to Ex rocker cover

3. New hose from Ex rocker to Separator

4. New hose from Separator to turbo.

5. Stuff steel wool in Separator to act as a "seed" for the oil vapour to condense onto.

No need for a third connection on the separator - block it off.

Simplesness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, blind_elk said:

Apologies for getting into this thread so late.

Firstly, would everyone please stop referring to this device as a "catch can", it is an "oil-air separator".

Secondly, the apparent installation is a bit iffy. Surely a simpler method:

1. Remove hose running from Ex rocker cover down to the turbo.

2. Leave hose connecting In rocker cover to Ex rocker cover

3. New hose from Ex rocker to Separator

4. New hose from Separator to turbo.

5. Stuff steel wool in Separator to act as a "seed" for the oil vapour to condense onto.

No need for a third connection on the separator - block it off.

Simplesness

Its a catch can unless its some how baffled at least. Read all of the thread - you will find that the vast quantity of oil requires more than a simple solution in this case - otherwise you are just pouring oil into the turbo intake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, blind_elk said:

Apologies for getting into this thread so late.

Firstly, would everyone please stop referring to this device as a "catch can", it is an "oil-air separator".

Secondly, the apparent installation is a bit iffy. Surely a simpler method:

1. Remove hose running from Ex rocker cover down to the turbo.

2. Leave hose connecting In rocker cover to Ex rocker cover

3. New hose from Ex rocker to Separator

4. New hose from Separator to turbo.

5. Stuff steel wool in Separator to act as a "seed" for the oil vapour to condense onto.

No need for a third connection on the separator - block it off.

Simplesness

thanks mate, i suppose in stage 4 you are refering to recirculating the vapor or oil into intake before turbo ?

mine is blowing to air so don't want any sh*t in my intake

 

only thing i have not checked is return on turbo, can leaking return line cause any blue smoke or crank pressure apart from obviously loosing oil as it returns ?

 

I am planning to change the gasket again in case that is the culprit as there is hardly any oil in catch can or intake pipe so can only think leaking oil from turbo, drain or sandwich plate ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno if you have already done this but get your car up to 100 or so in third gear - downhill would be better but not necessary - and then take your foot off the gas for five to eight seconds and then floor  it. Do you get a cloud of smoke out the back and if so what colour is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
    • Well, of course there's something wrong with the suspension. It was like that when it came out of the factory. Nissan wanted it to ride at least 50mm higher than most of us. They wanted it to be comfortable enough that the press and user reviews didn't complain about fillings being knocked out of teeth. The marketing people wanted to be able to talk about their fantastic new 4WS system (even if it was a pointless exercise, ha! pointless! Do you see what I did there? no? oh well. too bad). There weren't any semi-slicks or semi-semi-slicks or 18" wheels. Laser pointers didn't exist, so you couldn't easily build a bump steer gauge. There wasn't any better technology for suspension bushes than squishy shit in a condom. The list goes on.
    • I personally recommend not messing with factory suspension until you can clearly identify something wrong. For example I think the R33 might need some way to adjust front camber because I feathered the edges of the tires much more than the center of the tread doing some figure 8s and slalom.
×
×
  • Create New...