Jump to content
SAU Community

Wakefield has just cancelled all track days til September. Will it survive?


Recommended Posts

This sucks; https://www.speedcafe.com/2022/07/14/court-decision-delivers-hammer-blow-to-wakefield-park-future/

They'll likely be more expensive now also and who knows what the future holds. 

Just got new camber plates and semis and was hoping to go down in the next few weeks. :(

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They either have to religiously stick below the dB limits or just sell the track to developers and give up.

Having said that, there is noise about a great deal of grumbling wrt the rather savage effect this has had on all the related businesses in Goulburn. The hotels, etc. Apparently pretty chopped their businesses down in one fell swoop. Apparently there might be some NIMBYs told to pull their heads in by council.

Defo a wait and see for the moment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly the cows, sheep, bin chickens, wild flowers are really upset about the noise.

Council, or whoever they are, aren't very smart. Goulburn's livelihood is dependent on track racers such as myself. We would go down there for a weekend, eat/drink hire accommodation buy things at the local shops/Supercheap etc.

Not very smart for their economy, good on them for standing up for their rights. Good on ya Gary and Karen. 

 

image.thumb.png.225a127d30d73b1e198d4b35d32a0aae.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah absolutely. They copped it hard when the Goulburn bypass was built and this gives them another opportunity to attract business. 

Sound must travel quite well around there because there really is not much around it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will so realise how much of a dumb decision it was.. and by then it would have been too late.

Not long ago when we were down there, my friends and I were approached by the "GSK" aka Goulburn Sick Kients (no joke)... bogans on bicycles with mullets. Anyhow, asked me to rev the car, I gave them a good dose of dose & anti-lag... they loved it. I suppose that noise must have travelled from Wakefield Park all the way into town.

I apologise in advance from 4 years ago.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is worth a read to get the facts from both sides https://www.goulburnpost.com.au/story/7820901/appalling-outcome-wakefield-hits-out-at-court-ruling/

Wakefield put in a DA to expand, at which point it was noted they had been breaching noise limits for years. Council came to a best compromise they could under state noise rules which Wakie didn't agree to. So Wakie took council to the Land and Environment court, won the case, but got tighter restrictions than council offered.....so basically, tactical mistake after tactical mistake from the track, they just keep digging their hole deeper.

Its bad news for us, half the reason we moved to this part of the world was because the track is nearby.  On the other hand, its so quiet out here we can hear noise from 10klm away so I'm not surprised there are residents around who are not happy.

Bottom line, motorsport is a bad neighbour and the best thing it can do to be accepted is get quieter, fast. It's not such a big deal to have a muffled race car, and in 10 years time 90% of cars will be electric anyway....just time for them to move into the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sound waves are like shock waves, they will just "climb over" any wall you throw up

Mufflers, Db restrictions and no external gates are the way of the future if you want to keep it under control 

Local council doesn't care about the pittance of funds that come into the are from track days, opening up blocks that they can get a yearly rate from is more beneficial to them

The only saving grace would be that the land in close proximity be only opened as commercial, but that will not happen

Local commercial businesses are struggling in Goulburn and Braidwood, so there is no point in opening up more, halfway between there and nowhere

Unless you open up a exhaust shop inside the track maybe......nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Motorsports just sucks in NSW in general, there SFA tracks around. I remember Oran Park skid pan days were great, $80 ~ $100 the entire day per car. 

Sure Eastern Creek is a motorsport park, but it's not affordable for most young enthusiasts. 

Now Wakefield with their 4x event per month limit will just mean hiring the track would be even more expensive.

At this rate, getting a motion simulator seems like a better investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a bummer but a great track. I have been going there since it opened and love it, Currently run a HR31 Skyline with 2 mufflers due to receiving a nice letter from the EPA 2 years ago (noise complaint!). Still get the lovely RB sound inside and out but well under 95 db.

Not necessary to have open exhausts or screamers. if we want to keep going there for great fun then this is a small price to pay.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 215/45/18 tyres are probably a little on the low side compared to the factory tyre, it should be closer to a 245/45/19, which will get you about an extra 11mm of height, and should make you speedo read a bit closer to reality. 245/45/19s will be a bit too far the other way and you risk a speeding ticket as your speedo might read slower than your actual speed.  245/40/19s would be correct if you are going to 19in rims, they will give you a similar total diameter to the 245/45/18 tyres.  
    • That's something I forgot to put in my list. The aggressive anti-squat in R32 is a f**king menace. I still need to decide if I'm going to drag the subframe out of my car and weld in the GKTech corrector kit. The main reason to dither is the need to switch to spherical joints in the lower arm to account for the twist induced in the rear pivot caused by lowering the front pivot. And yes...we do put better subframes in R32s, and I wish I'd gotten an S14 one instead of an A31 when I did the "take off and nuke it from orbit" HICAS delete all those years ago.
    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
×
×
  • Create New...